And does this mean that because climate has changed slowly in the past, before human industrialisation, slow changes corresponding to the climate being
slightly out of equilibrium, that the speed of future climate change and the extent of the disequilibrium can be ignored?
-- only energy balance matters (here comes the school
of people saying that the system is trivially simple because it exchanges energy only by radiation)-- only «
equilibrium» matters (here comes the school
of people who compare the system to a small ball
slightly moved away from its
equilibrium position inside a spherical bowl)-- space doesn't matter (this is a tautology because if a 3D system can be reduced to 1D and still predicted, then the «neglected» 2 D obviously didn't matter)-- from the above follows also necessarily that everything that happens in the real 3D world can only be noise (here comes the school
of people who say that everything averages
out)