Not exact matches
This sandy heap actually causes the oozing ice to
slow, pile up and thicken
slightly behind it — providing a buffer that may stabilize the ice sheet in the face of those
warm currents.
A weaker sun might
slow human - induced climate change
slightly but when the sun eventually recovers force, global
warming would heat up with even more of a vengeance.
Now, a study suggests that by increasing the size of a
warm body of water in the Pacific, El Niño might even
slow down Earth's rotation, resulting in
slightly longer days.
His voice, however, sounds exactly as you would expect it to:
warm,
slow, ever so
slightly nervous.
«Note: LOTI provides a more realistic representation of the global mean trends than dTs below; it
slightly underestimates
warming or cooling trends, since the much larger heat capacity of water compared to air causes a
slower and diminished reaction to changes.»
Continued strong demand for all fossil fuels seems a certainty at this time, even taking into account stronger policies to mitigate global
warming risks, though sustained high prices may
slow growth
slightly.
This rate (0.28 degC per century) is very different to the rates referred to by Phil Jones for the
warming periods detailed in my above comment, so the
slow down is very apparent when the last 20 years is compared to the rate of the 1860 to 1880
warming episode which was
slightly greater than the 1920 to 1940
warming episode, and also
slightly greater than the late 20th century
warming episode
Lolwot is saying the evidence is that global
warming has accelerated
slightly rather than
slowed in the past 16, or so, years.
To point out just a couple of things: — oceans
warming slower (or cooling
slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to
warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water
warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are
slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from
slightly negative / stable to
slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands»
warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters
warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small
warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very
warmer than air during day, and how much it can
slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
The effects of cooling are rather academic at this point, since the world isn't cooling, the hypothetical long minimum hasn't happened as yet, and the solar scientists are not predicting that the world will cool if that occurs, only that the rate of
warming will
slow,
slightly.
Global
warming appear to have
slightly slowed in the last decade despite record greenhouse gas emissions, and this cooling pollution could be the cause.
Keep it constant, and the shell never
warms to the same as the initial temp., of the earth, and the earth
warms only
slightly because the presence of the shell
slows down the efflux of heat (it's an insulator).
Note: LOTI provides a more realistic representation of the global mean trends than dTs below; it
slightly underestimates
warming or cooling trends, since the much larger heat capacity of water compared to air causes a
slower and diminished reaction to changes; dTs on the other hand overestimates trends, since it disregards most of the dampening effects of the oceans that cover about two thirds of the Earth's surface.
One season's weather could either speed up or
slightly slow down the loss of Arctic sea ice this year, but it will not change the climate trend and the basic causes of
warming.
The «note» you refer to goes: «Note: LOTI provides a more realistic representation of the global mean trends than dTs below; it
slightly underestimates
warming or cooling trends, since the much larger heat capacity of water compared to air causes a
slower and diminished reaction to changes; dTs on the other hand overestimates trends, since it disregards most of the dampening effects of the oceans that cover about two thirds of the earth's surface.»