Everything from errors in grammar and punctuation, to
sloppy written work product, to misunderstandings caused by ill - conceived, quickly sent texts has been characterized as consequences of a «continuing assault of technology on formal written English.»
Not exact matches
Peter Debruge of Variety also finds it to be a «lumbering, confused, and cacophonous mess,» but, while acknowledging that it's almost impossible to divorce the film from its production woes, Indiewire's Eric Kohn
writes, «It's
sloppy and amateurish in parts, but always reaching for something, often resulting in a fascinating half - formed beast
working through a lot of baggage: a vanity project about the nature of vanity, centered around one of literature's most famous examples, in the context of the most famous vanity projects of all time coming to fruition.
Written assignments may take two or three times as long to complete, and often they will look
sloppy even if the student has tried to produce their best
work.
Handwriting recognition lets you
write out addresses, and it's quite good at picking up on my admittedly
sloppy finger
work.
They will
write scathing reviews on Amazon if your technical
work is
sloppy.
They have no idea how amateurish their
writing is (telling, POV errors,
sloppy syntax, etc.) and are staggered to find that their
work does NOT need a copy edit — it needs a developmental edit and another draft.
Heddaya
writes: «From the outside, Weathersby's pieces straddle the clinical geometry of Op art and the organic architectural character of traditional room dividers and panels, like the Arab mashrabeya or the Japanese screen, and are unobtrusive, orderly, suggestive even of a painterly monasticism... Ken Weathersby is certainly not the first artist to have manipulated painting and denotation, or desecrated the ever - cooling corpse of canvas — the project has a distinctly vintage, Black Mountain College feel to it — but there is a focused and exploratory energy at
work in his pieces, a maturity of purpose that stands at ascetic remove from the cloying color and
sloppy corporeality that too often comes to the fore in Bushwick.»
After following the global warming saga — science and policy — for nearly a quarter century, I've seen the biases at the journals and N.S.F. (including their press releases sometimes), in the I.P.C.C. summary process (the deep reports are mainly
sloppy in some cases; the summary
writing — read the climate - extinction section of this post — is where the spin lies), and sometimes in the statements and
work of individual researchers (both skeptics and «believers»).
4) Put another way, a bunch of people are trying to
write off the plgarisim of Bradley tee - rings as
sloppy citation, but unlike Bradley on ice ores or corals, or the SNA
work, the various distortions (I think there are 11 in jsut a page and half of text) are either misrepresentation or fabrication... and those are * worse * in academe, because they are not just sloppiness or laziness.
If
written work is
sloppy, disorganized, or muddled then it fails because readers have limited
working memory to consume and digest complex information.