In short, your calculation is based on the exchange rate, not the decay rate and the 14C spike is of no help in this case, because that shows a mixture of
slow decay rate and fast exchange rate, where the fastest is dominant.
The water drawn from Shreveport gives
a slower decay rate than does water from NYNY.
Low oxygen conditions
slow decay rates, resulting in much of the carbon accumulating in the soil.
Not exact matches
(In L. humile, the pheromone concentrations do
decay but at a very
slow rate.)
cardiomyocytes exhibit decreased peak shortening and maximal velocity of shortening / relengthening, prolonged time - to - 90 % relengthening, reduced intracellular calcium release upon electrical stimulus associated with a
slowed intracellular calcium
decay rate, and significantly higher oxygen levelse, and significantly higher oxygen levels
You might notice that sugar dissolves in hot water faster, or putting food in the refrigerator will
slow the
rate of
decay.
When the oceans begin to
slow the
rate of CO2 uptake at saturation point that will futher push atmospheric CO2 even higher, simultaneously the massive amounts of additional CO2 and methane and nitrous oxide etc released from the
decay and oxidisation of oceanic living creatures who can not survive in a low ph environment will future ram the nail in the coffin.
I agree that the multimillennial «tail» of the CO2
decay trajectory is relatively unimportant in its own right, but it is not trivial, because it affects the overall
rate of
decay that includes processes that occur over many decades or a few centuries involving CO2 mixing into the deep ocean and carbonate buffering, and makes them
slower than they would be otherwise.
The reasons are also based on the physics, which require that initial equilibration involves the rapidly equilibrating sinks in the ocean mixed layer and some terrestrial sources, while the overall
decay rate that involves
slower equilibration with larger sinks is much
slower.
=
decay rate, and the
decay rate can only be
slower in the presence of incoming CO2.
Thus the observed sink
rate in 14C
decay is far too short, the real sink
rate of the
decay of an extra amount of CO2 is much
slower.
The other point is very
slow partial radiative
decay rates of CO2 molecules were determined by experiment.
While lots of carbon cycles in and out of the atmosphere from photosynthesis and
decay (most of that 95 % figure), the planet has a (comparably) very
slow rate of removing carbon from the atmosphere and oceans for geological timescales — only enough to roughly cancel out volcanoes and other proportionally very small «old carbon» sources.