We all understand rates may need to change over time, but that would (for blanket change) be
slow gradual changes and slight adjustments to rates.
Not exact matches
@JL: «It's pretty clear that many of the features of this earth could not have been formed by
slow and
gradual change.»
It's pretty clear that many of the features of this earth could not have been formed by
slow and
gradual change.
The many, many, many fossils that show the
slow,
gradual change from one species to another we call evolution.
Evolution is not a drastic process wherein huge, noticeable
changes occur quickly — it is a
slow and
gradual process that takes enormous amounts of time (far more than the creationist posited 6,000 year old Earth).
Lower numbers are better as this means
slower digestion and very
gradual changes in blood sugar.
Biological
changes are
gradual and
slow - acting.
Hancock's plaint is that mainstream science is stuck in a uniformitarian model of
slow,
gradual change and so can not accept a catastrophic explanation.
It was a
slow,
gradual change that occurred because your daily Caloric intake for that period exceeded your daily Caloric expenditure by some small amount.
If you want to
change your Mini Bulldog puppy's brand of puppy kibble, the
change should be
slow and
gradual.
Leaving aside the descents into glaciation, which were much more
gradual, the sudden (geologically speaking) jumps up in temperature every ~ 100,000 years represent a rate of
change roughly ten times
slower what we are currently witnessing.
This optimism will hinge strongly on events in Europe this week and moving ahead, but if these trends continue, we should expect a
slow and
gradual corresponding rise in public belief and concern over climate
change, a trend that will be important analyze by comparing findings across multiple survey firms and forms of question wording.
Robert I Ellison: Dynamical complexity explains both persistence and abrupt shifts in climate data — and demands that we
change our expectations about future behaviour from
slow and
gradual to abrupt and potentially large.
Dynamical complexity explains both persistence and abrupt shifts in climate data — and demands that we
change our expectations about future behaviour from
slow and
gradual to abrupt and potentially large.
The best evidence in support of that proposition of
slow long term solar background
changes is the
gradual and irregular
change from Roman Warm period to The Dark Ages to the Mediaeval Warm Period and thence to the Little Ice Age and finally to our recent Modern Maximum.
Previous
changes in climate have generally been
slow and
gradual.
«The Earth's climate system is highly nonlinear: inputs and outputs are not proportional,
change is often episodic and abrupt, rather than
slow and
gradual,... It is imperative that the Earth's climate system research community embraces this nonlinear paradigm if we are to move forward in the assessment of the human influence on climate..»
«The Earth's climate system is highly nonlinear: inputs and outputs are not proportional,
change is often episodic and abrupt, rather than
slow and
gradual, and multiple equilibria are the norm... there is a relatively poor understanding of the different types of nonlinearities, how they manifest under various conditions, and whether they reflect a climate system driven by astronomical forcings, by internal feedbacks, or by a combination of both... [We] suggest a robust alternative to prediction that is based on using integrated assessments within the framework of vulnerability studies... It is imperative that the Earth's climate system research community embraces this nonlinear paradigm if we are to move forward in the assessment of the human influence on climate.»
One useful way of classifying tipping elements is in terms of the time, T, over which a qualitative
change is observed: (i) rapid, abrupt, or spasmodic tipping occurs if the observation time is very small compared with TP (but T ≠ 0); (ii)
gradual or episodic tipping occurs if the observation time is intermediate (e.g., of order TP); and (iii)
slow or asymptotic tipping occurs if the observation time is very long (in particular, T → TE).
Although sea - level rise typically is
slow compared to many environmental
changes, even this type of
gradual sea - level rise may force other systems to cross thresholds and trigger abrupt impacts for natural or human systems unless adaptive measures are taken.
These studies have shown that an early warning signal may be detectable if an abrupt
change is driven by
gradual forcing and preceded by the critical
slow down, increased variances, and skewness (e.g., Held and Kleinen, 2004; Livina and Lenton, 2007).
Advocates of the assumption that CO2 variations are a primary cause of
changes in deep ocean heat content (i.e., those who author government - sponsored IPCC reports and activists for the anthropogenic global warming cause) have necessarily believed that past natural variations in deep ocean heat content are very
slow and
gradual.
The company has confirmed these
changes will be
slow and
gradual starting this coming year.
Experts say it will be a
slow change, and expect a
gradual series of rate hikes over the next year, so that the uptick will not negatively impact the healing economy or housing market.