No matter how well the world controls emissions of greenhouse gases, global climate change is inevitable, warn two new studies which take into account the oceans»
slow response to warming.
Not exact matches
Despite
slower temperature shifts in ocean waters, ocean life from plankton
to fish have begun moving in
response to global
warming
A four - degree -
warmer world will therefore demand a range of
responses, from immediate and bold
to slow and cautious.
«We found compelling evidence that invasive shrubs, such as Japanese barberry, are ready
to leaf out quickly once they are exposed
to warm temperatures in the lab even in the middle of winter, whereas native shrubs, like highbush bluberry, and native trees, like red maple, need
to go through a longer winter chilling period before they can leaf out — and even then their
response is
slow,» says Amanda Gallinat, a second - year graduate student and third author of the paper.
Model studies for climate change between the Holocene and the Pliocene, when Earth was about 3 °C
warmer, find that
slow feedbacks due
to changes of ice sheets and vegetation cover amplified the fast feedback climate
response by 30 — 50 % [216].
A task force assembled by the American Psychological Association hopes
to spur more research on the role of the human mind in shaping the behaviors resulting in rising greenhouse - gas emissions as well as on traits that can impede an effective
response to global
warming and similar
slow - building environmental risks.
With this prediction, and the trend toward the
slowing down of the jet stream, is it time
to consider / advocate geoengineering as a
response to global
warming?
In
response to your request, here is another specific suggestion for
slowing down global
warming.
The good news: Because black carbon stays in the atmosphere for only days or weeks, moving quickly
to expand existing technology can be an effective rapid
response to slow warming, buying critical time
to achieve reductions in CO2.
If I understood Armour's paper correctly, he claimed that all feed - backs were close
to linear in
response to temperature over time, but that different regional
warming rates (specifically,
slow warming at high latitudes) could make the feed - backs and sensitivity appear
to increase with time.
DK12 used ocean heat content (OHC) data for the upper 700 meters of oceans
to draw three main conclusions: 1) that the rate of OHC increase has
slowed in recent years (the very short timeframe of 2002
to 2008), 2) that this is evidence for periods of «climate shifts», and 3) that the recent OHC data indicate that the net climate feedback is negative, which would mean that climate sensitivity (the total amount of global
warming in
response to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 levels, including feedbacks) is low.
«Glaciers in higher colder mountainous regions will be
slower to melt even as temps rise, the lower tundra areas will respond more quickly
to such changes and this is shown by the quicker
responses in tree line
to the lesser
warming periods like the MWP at ground level further north from him, and not just fossil remains but old farming settlements uncovered, and so on.»
Meehl et al., 2004 found that «By far the largest temperature
response is
to the GHGs in Fig. 1e, with
slow warming occurring in the first half of the twentieth century up
to about.
A dynamic eco-evolutionary model predicts
slow response of alpine plants
to climate
warming.
Rob P @ 6 - yes, the quote from Trenberth in the OP is in
response to Annan saying that
warming has
slowed over the past decade.
Dana:... quote from Trenberth in the OP is in
response to Annan saying that
warming has
slowed over the past decade.
In contrast, the 1000 GtC scenario, although nominally designed
to yield a fast - feedback climate
response of ∼ 2 °C, would yield a larger eventual
warming because of
slow feedbacks, probably at least 3 °C.
There are a number of global
warming objections that the data must be wrong attributing differences
to slow sensor
response etc..
Model studies for climate change between the Holocene and the Pliocene, when Earth was about 3 °C
warmer, find that
slow feedbacks due
to changes of ice sheets and vegetation cover amplified the fast feedback climate
response by 30 — 50 % [216].
It has a
slower response time like a storage heater but once it gets
to a certain temperature, it stays
warm.»
The MWP is better explained by the Arctic Amplification effect whereas northern hemisphere
warming is amplified due
to faster thermal
response to climate forcing due
to greater land mass and less ocean mass; compared
to the southern hemisphere which is largely water (which has a
slower thermal inertial
response to climate forcings).
Recently there have been some studies and comments by a few climate scientists that based on the
slowed global surface
warming over the past decade, estimates of the Earth's overall equilibrium climate sensitivity (the total amount of global surface
warming in
response to the increased greenhouse effect from a doubling of atmospheric CO2, including amplifying and dampening feedbacks) may be a bit too high.
The relatively
slow response of glaciers
to global
warming means it will take
to the end of the century — and beyond —
to see the benefits of mitigation efforts in the coming decades, the study says.
(2) A steady ongoing ice loss from ice sheets is added in — this has nothing
to do with modern
warming but is a
slow response to earlier climate changes.
For the ice sheets the answer is probably no (but experts on the subject might have a better idea), but for the overturning circulation or the ecosystem changes, the answer is probably yes — i.e. a
slower rate of
warming could lead
to a different
response (allowing time for ocean mixing
to mitigate the effects, or adaptation of species
to the new conditions).
Fast and
Slow Responses to Global Warming: Sea Surface Temperature and Precipitation Patterns The deep ocean warming retards the surface warming in the fast response but turns into a forcing for the slow respo
Slow Responses to Global
Warming: Sea Surface Temperature and Precipitation Patterns The deep ocean warming retards the surface warming in the fast response but turns into a forcing for the slow re
Warming: Sea Surface Temperature and Precipitation Patterns The deep ocean
warming retards the surface warming in the fast response but turns into a forcing for the slow re
warming retards the surface
warming in the fast response but turns into a forcing for the slow re
warming in the fast
response but turns into a forcing for the
slow respo
slow response.
Imagine that the
response of bristle - cone pines
to temperature has a peak, i.e. it does not track temperature monotonically, but has a temperature with a maximum growth rate, then beyond that it
slows down again (maybe it is too
warm for the pine trees or something like that).
These gradually increase with time, then
slow to 0.008 °C yr − 1 after the total increase exceeds 4 °C and the maximum tolerated
warming is 4.5 °C assuming massive societal
response to large changes (similar
to the «backstop» technology deployed in DICE for large temperature changes).
The North Atlantic
warms in a few months in
response to an El Niño, through changes in atmospheric circulation (
slower trade winds in the tropical North Atlantic, for example).