Both datasets show the very
slow warming rates (and cooling at some latitudes) extending from the mid-latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere to the mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere.
A slower warming rate will occur in the second half of the century, assuming that the climate forcing growth rate begins to trend downward before 2050.
If the two trend lines had the same slope and one contained feedback and the other didn't, the one with feedback would indicate
a slower warming rate because the feedback would produce less feedback than an initial pulse.
We know that the rate of warming as shown by the tropospheric satellite records indicate
a slower warming rate than the surface record.
Not exact matches
This would mean significant change to the amount of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere and would
slow down the
rate of
warming.
If you care about the people in this world living closest to the margins, then you need to do everything in your power to
slow the
rate at which the planet
warms, for they are the most vulnerable.
But it wasn't until she wrote this poignant post, «Mothers Needed to Protect the Earth,» that I really started thinking harder about harnessing the power of the Green Mom blogosphere to draw attention to climate change and to advocate changes to
slow the
rate of global
warming.
The
rate of global
warming has
slowed — but why?
The model also suggests that the decline in water vapour concentrations that occurred in 2001
slowed down the
rate of global
warming in the last decade by 25 per cent.
The
rate of
warming was just 0.04 °C per decade from 1998 to 2012, significantly lower than the average 0.11 °C
warming per decade since 1951 (see «How much has
warming slowed?
And while the
rate of planetary
warming has
slowed in the past 16 years, it hasn't stopped.
With these scenarios in mind, the researchers identified what measures can be taken to
slow the
rate of global
warming to avoid the worst consequences, particularly the low - probability high - impact events.
The deceleration in rising temperatures during this 15 - year period is sometimes referred to as a «pause» or «hiatus» in global
warming, and has raised questions about why the
rate of surface
warming on Earth has been markedly
slower than in previous decades.
Temperatures in the Arctic are increasing twice as fast as in the rest of the globe, while the Antarctic is
warming at a much
slower rate.
«There are steps they can take to actually
slow the
rate at which they're
warming.»
That may sound like great news — but it doesn't mean that the world is
warming at a
slower rate or that the need to reduce emissions has become less urgent, the researchers warn.
What scientists discovered in 2014 is that since the turn of the century, oceans have been absorbing more of global
warming's heat and energy than would normally be expected, helping to
slow rates of
warming on land.
Projections indicate the temperatures could rise as much as 11 °F by century's end if greenhouse gas emissions aren't
slowed and that the
rate of
warming could reach levels unseen in 1,000 years by 2030s.
13 The
slower rate of
warming in the past decade might be due to a 10 percent drop in stratospheric water.
Most climate models haven't captured this
slower rate of
warming.
The silicate + CO2 - > different silicate + carbonate chemical weathering
rate tends to increase with temperature globally, and so is a negative feedback (but is too
slow to damp out short term changes)-- but chemical weathering is also affected by vegetation, land area, and terrain (and minerology, though I'm not sure how much that varies among entire mountain ranges or climate zones)-- ie mountanous regions which are in the vicinity of a
warm rainy climate are ideal for enhancing chemical weathering (see Appalachians in the Paleozoic, more recently the Himalayas).
Meanwhile, cooler - than - normal water has risen up to replace it in the eastern Pacific, a mechanism that has temporarily helped
slow the
rate of
warming on land, despite continued global
warming.
In the case of
warming caused by a disproportionate increase in atmospheric CO2 (compared with oceanic CO2), an increase in temperatures only
slows down the
rate at which CO2 is absorbed by the oceans.
Ecologist team finds leaf litter has
slower decomposition
rate in
warm temperatures than previously estimated
John Christy and Roy Spencer of the University of Alabama published a series of papers starting about 1990 that implied the troposphere was
warming at a much
slower rate than the surface temperature record and climate models indicated Spencer and Christy (1992).
MIS 11 has the
slowest warming onset
rate.
Note the longevity of the
warming, especially if emissions reduction is as
slow as 2 % / year, which might be considered to be a rapid
rate of reduction.
Interglacial trends over the past 400,000 years exhibit steep
warming onsets,
slower cooling
rates and nearly flat plateaus.
«The class starts with a
slow meditative
warm up, quickly moving into a powerful vinyasa flow that revs the heart
rate and fatigues the muscles of the upper and lower body,» explains Niki.
It is also true that after static passive stretching your coordination is temporarily reduced, your heart
rate and respiratory system
slows down (The complete opposite of what you want your
warm up to achieve) and instead of increasing your readiness for physical exertion this type of flexibility training is more likely to make you feel sleepy which is why it should be used as part of a cool down.
(it's quicker to wait for the car to
warm up first, otherwise the aircon being on hot will cause the engine to heat up at a
slower rate.)
If you have a
warm water, aquarium hoods benefit your tank by
slowing down the
rate at which it evaporates.
The inclusion of a negative b value for the first derivative term in the model defies physical rational... more rapid
warming is expected to correspond to a faster not
slower rate of rise.
If this is so,
warming will proceed at a
slower rate until these intermediate waters are brought to a temperature at which they can no longer absorb heat.
That said, during long periods of negative PDO, the
rate of global
warming is
slower, and during positive periods of the PDO, the
rate of
warming is faster.
If it would
warm 5 degrees this century, which seem quite possible, that would be about 100 times faster than the average
rate during the last deglaciation, although I suppose ocean heat content rises somewhat
slower.
Feed - in tariffs on fossil energy imports to the United States would surely end up reducing demand for fossil fuels as more and more renewable capacity became available — which is exactly what you would want to see happen if you are serious about
slowing the
rate of global
warming.
The oceans are
warming now but they are still a CO2 sink (hence acidification), even if the
rate is
slowing.
With even further
warming more hydrates are released, additional global soil feedback (extreme soil respiration
rates, compost bomb instability) and weathering becomes a driver, now Ocean very stratified, maybe things like permanent El Nino, weather systems probably move very
slow — everything gets stuck due to lack of perturbed ocean, no or very little frozen water at the poles.
Decreasing greenhouse gases and our carbon footprint will
slow the
rate of global
warming, but it will not fully resolve the problem of global
warming.
To make things even more difficult, the current
rate of
warming is not comparable with previous periods, where greenhouse gas increases were much
slower.
The (apparent)
slower rate of projected model
warming for a higher absolute temperature may be related to other factors like cloud amount and geographical distribution at higher absolute humidity, or increases in convective transport (due to more atmospheric instability) at higher absolute humidity.
Southern Greenland turns out to have one of the
slowest rates of
warming of any land area in any of the scenarios (the figure is the mean over all models for the SRES A1B scenario).
If the net forcing increased for several decades, then leveled off 15 - 20 years ago, wouldn't that cause the
rate of
warming to level off too, not to
slow down?
Now, like a good troll, you are shifting the goalposts to «a
slower rate» of
warming.
But the sheer
rate of increase over just the past 55 years shows how fast global
warming could hit us in the future — and the present — and underscores how much we've failed as a planet to
slow down carbon emissions.
We could reduce short - lived pollutants later, of course, but the inertia from CO2 - induced
warming means that those measures can only
slow the
rate of
warming, not reverse it and bring us back below 2 ̊C.
134 Victor quoted: «There seem to have been a dozen or so explanations for why the Earth's surface has
warmed at a
slower rate over the past 15 years compared to earlier decades.»
«have the years since 2000 seen a
slower rate of net
warming in the air than 1970 - 2000?
Slowing the
rate of global
warming means reducing fossil fuel use and halting tropical deforestation; that will give people more time to adapt to our destabilized climate, «using whatever means available.»