Sentences with phrase «slower ssd»

The previous Spectre x360 generation used a slower SSD that only managed 1,202 MB / s read and 583 MB / s write, so we're getting a worthy update in that regard.

That's a comfortable rate of 212 MBps, which would dwarf any laptop with a mechanical hard drive or a slower SSD.

However, for large file transfers (1 GB or more), the slower SSD speeds are slower than similarly configured laptops in this category.

Dell's Venue 11 Pro 7000 has a more colorful display and even longer battery life, but it has a slower SSD and it runs hotter.

Unfortunately, we noticed lag when opening applications, owing in part to the Vivo Tab's relatively slow SSD.

Screen is fingerprint magnet; Relatively slow SSD; Limited port selection for business notebook

Getting an SSD is more important for overall performance than getting a faster processor, because even a slow SSD is three to four times faster than the speediest mechanical hard drive.

As usual, while this is a slow SSD, it doesn't actually result in a slow notebook.

Not exact matches

The MicroSD card slot in the bottom of the tablet will let you add more storage, but MicroSD cards are typically more than 10 times as slow as an SSD, especially when it comes to write speeds.

The Dell Venue 11 Pro's 64 GB SSD's took 20 seconds to boot Windows 8.1, slower than the 16 - second category average.

The W700 and Surface Pro, which also have 128 GB SSDs, returned slower transfer speeds of 138 Mbps and 124 Mbps, respectively.

The Venue 11 Pro and its 64 GB SSD posted a slower mark of 20 seconds.

With a boot time of 10 seconds, the ThinkPad Helix» 128 GB SSD proved speedy, but it was just a few ticks slower than the Elitebook Revolve 810's 8 - second boot time.

On the minus side you have only 2 GB of RAM and 64 GB in the base version (we're seeing a 4 GB, 128 GB version too) and if the SSD is the same as I tested in the 13 ″ version, it's not as fast as the ASUS UX21 but it's not a slow - coach either.

While the Transformer Book's 128 GB SSD boots quickly, it transfers files much slower than the competition.

This SSD has read / write speeds of 530 / 510MB / s respectively, and IOPS speeds of 92K / 83K read / write, meaning it's only about 10 % slower than a top performer like the Kingston or the Samsung, while coming in at a much lower price.

Cheaper SSDs have slightly slower read and write speeds, as well as usually lower capacity storage options.

Because this controller is completely digital and there are no moving parts, this means that SSDs never slow down.

SSD space is precious, and if there's anything you don't mind offloading to a slower HDD, it's a great idea to do so.

Whether you're interested in one of the more expensive, faster solid state drives on this list, or one of the slightly slower and less expensive (but still blazing quick) choices, an SSD is certainly one of the best choices you can make to improve your computing life.

It's still a bit slower than the Kingston HyperX, but given that it has less power impact, it's certainly a good choice if you're running an SLI or CrossFire graphics setup, or are worried about your PSU being able to handle a more power - hungry SSD.

As you can see here, the Inspiron's mechanical 1 TB hard drive is a lot slower than the G11DF's 256 GB SSD.

How much slower performance depends on your specific SSD.

Sure, file system fragmentation can cause Windows to slow down over time as well — but Windows automatically defragments your hard drive and defragmentation isn't even necessary on SSDs.

The read time is so fast on SSDs that you don't really need to build a file index and the actual process of indexing the drive and writing the index is slow on SSDs.

That's because SSDs may slow down as you fill them up, just like any other drive — but this was more helpful when SSDs were tiny.

If an SSD is sufficiently overprovisioned, it may not even be possible to slow it down by filling it up with data.

Though it does indeed come standard with an SSD (a Samsung - made one, in my case), these are of the slower mSATA variety — not PCIe - based disks like we're used to seeing on other flagship laptops.

The ZBook is significantly faster than the Lenovo ThinkPad T470 (267.8 MBps, 256 GB PCIe SSD) and the Dell Precision 5520 (462.7 MBps, 512 GB M. 2 PCIe SSD), but slower than the MacBook Pro 13 - inch (727MBps, 512 GB PCIe NVMe SSD).

The A515 is upgradable, so you can replace the slow hard drive with an SSD later — you can get a 250 GB solid - state drive for about $ 90 and a 500 GB for about $ 140 — but most people should spend more up front to avoid the hassle.

And if Optane memory comes bundled, performance could increase further, though the 7th - gen system Intel used for comparison includes a slower mechanical hard drive rather than an SSD.

If you go with a hard drive because you get more storage for less money, know that it will be noticeably slower than a solid - state drive (SSD), though the higher cost and lower capacity of a faster SSD may be a trade - off that some people are willing to make.

Whether it is booting the OS, running Windows Store apps, or even some light gaming, you would never suspect that the SSD was by any means slow.

Amazon also sells a more affordable $ 899 configuration, which features the same 1920 x 1080 display, fingerprint sensor and Asus pen, but bumps you down to a slower Core i5 - 8250 processor, 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB of SSD storage, and removes the discrete graphics in favor of integrated graphics.

That's slower than the 531.34 MBps category average, as well as the speeds from the 512 GB PCIe SSD in the ZBook Studio (508.92 MBps), the 512 GB PCIe M. 2 SSD in the ThinkPad P70 (848.2 MBps), the 512 GB SSD in the MSI WE72 7RJ (848.2 MBps), and the 512 GB M. 2 PCIe SSD in the Precision 5520 (462.66 MBps).

Unfortunately, although our unit came with a PCIe NVMe SSD — the fastest type — the Toshiba XG4 drive Dell equipped it with was slow and held back the Precision 7720's scores on a number of tests.

The refresh to Dell's outstanding budget gaming laptop (starting at about $ 800) is a good one, removing the slow HDD - only storage option and introducing SSD as standard.

The paging file can also be moved to another drive — for example, you could move it from a small SSD to a slower, larger hard drive.

You'll probably notice it's slower, USB 2.0 is very slow compared to SSDs.

For one, all the storage options rely on an Intel Rapid Hybrid system that is a mishmash of a relatively fast SSD for the OS, and a slower, mechanical hard disk drive for mass storage.

The version of the ZenBook Pro we have for review has the slower PCIe SSD which shows compared to some of the top laptops out there with NVMe SSDs on board.

Some cheap laptops have eMMC storage, which is kind of like an SSD in that it's solid - state storage — but, unlike an SSD, is very, very slow.

Like SD cards, MMC cards and their interfaces are much slower than an SSD.

This would make writing to an SSD slower over time.

Aside from the slower processor and graphics changes, the non-Touch Bar MacBook Pro has the same faster SSD and the same improved display, along with the same design changes.

The PC's 1 TB, 7,200 - rpm hard drive copied about 5 GB of files at a rate of 52.46 MBps, which is significantly slower than the Y700's 128 GB SSD (110.6 MBps) and the Asus G20's 256 GB SSD (171.3 MBps).

Mechanical hard drives will be slower than SSDs, which is why they're being phased out.

When you boot your computer, it should now boot a bit slower — perhaps just a few seconds longer on an SSD — but the Num Lock key will be enabled at boot.

Despite the slower speeds for productivity apps such as Microsoft Office and Windows Store apps the SATA SSD felt just fine in regular usage, and it's clearly faster than a standard hard disk drive (HDD).

A perfect storm of entry - level RAM, modest SSD write speeds, and lack of Hyper - Threading makes for a slow effort, which we didn't expect.