China's leaders have made it clear that they are willing to tolerate
slower economic growth if that growth rate is sustainable and allows for increased domestic consumption (and hence job creation).
«Why would the Federal Reserve raise interest rates in order to
slow economic growth if in fact inflation was moving lower?
Not exact matches
If oil prices do not escalate, the government's budget outlook will deteriorate in the billions of dollars, through a combination of
slow economic growth and lower than anticipated inflation.
That kind of
growth would cause problems within the country, especially
if job losses mount or
growth remains
slow for the long term, but Dollar said a steep decline
economic expansion may be just what the country needs.
In January the International Monetary Fund said China's
economic growth would top 6.6 percent in 2018, but it could now drop by as much as 0.5 percent
if these tariffs are imposed — and it could
slow even further
if a global trade war truly heats up.
But
if our net worth takes a hit, we'll stop spending to save and pay down debt, and
economic growth will
slow.
If the market fluctuations continue, they could dampen business and consumer confidence and ultimately
slow U.S.
economic growth.
If economic growth and job creation continue to
slow, as they surely will, and the unemployment rate remains stubbornly high, as it surely will, we have only the private sector to blame.
The world
economic growth will
slow to 1 % in 2009 down from 2.5 % this year as the financial crisis disrupts and the world
economic growth may even narrow
if stimulus packages prove too little too late, a U.N. report noted.
If foreign
economic growth is
slower than anticipated, the Fed could raise rates more slowly than otherwise, he said.
And
if the economy is not entering a recession, then most certainly it is entering an extended period of
slow economic growth, as a result of both external and internal
economic developments.
First,
if growth did not recover and surprise on the upside (in which case high asset prices would be justified), eventually
slow growth would dominate the levitational effects of liquidity and force asset prices lower, in line with weaker
economic fundamentals.
If Taylor is correct, then low short - term interest rates have not contributed to the
economic expansion and raising them will not
slow economic growth.
Even
if China's debt and real estate bubbles don't pop, resulting in a global recession,
slowing economic growth from China could have a detrimental effect on long - term energy prices and result in prolonged weakness in the entire energy sector, including oil services suppliers such as U.S. Silica.
It could also be different
if it coincides with importunate military pressures or pressures on the currency that preclude
slower - paced adjustment (as in 1931 or 1950), or
if it takes place in the context of an external bailout that cuts across the normal electoral cycle (as with the US bailout of the Attlee government in 1949, the IMF bailout of 1976 or the more recent Eurozone bailouts), or in a context of no or very low
economic growth over a prolonged period.
Alternatively, prices fall
if low - cost technologies for lessening carbon dioxide release appear, or
slow economic growth weakens the industries that emit CO2.
I realize that much has changed in the last few years — widespread
economic hardship, cuts in state aid by both Democratic and Republican state governments, much
slower than anticipated
growth in property values,, the opportunity to cut staff compensation under the threat of union busting, dramatic cuts to the revenue limit base — but despite all of these changes,
if you go back to the principles and the details of Partnership Plan used to sell the 2008 Operating Referendum (which passed overwhelmingly) I think you can find plenty of justification for increasing property taxes in order to achieve the mission of the district.
The concern is that as rates rise it will cost companies more to roll over their obligations, and
if earnings begin to slump as
economic growth slows, that could blow out leverage ratios and lead to credit - rating cuts.
When
economic growth slows, a quality index will outperform — but
if this is coupled with low inflation then minimum volatility will outperform.
If interest rates rise high enough, borrowers will stop borrowing and
economic growth will stall, which should help
slow down or reverse inflation.
So,
if the market sentiment decides it doesn't like a few factors, such as a decision to follow a divergent monetary policy, continued
slow global
economic growth, a world - wide aging population, and the swearing in of Donald Trump as the next American President, we could be see a rise in bond rates, which will absolutely start to increase fixed - rate mortgage rates.
I've been away for the past couple of months, but even
if I hadn't been there wasn't much to write about; the equity markets have continued their
slow climb despite lackluster US
economic growth.
If adaptation can be completed within 10 years, economic growth in the 21st century would be 0.6 % slower if climate changes according to the A2 scenario than in the case without climate chang
If adaptation can be completed within 10 years,
economic growth in the 21st century would be 0.6 %
slower if climate changes according to the A2 scenario than in the case without climate chang
if climate changes according to the A2 scenario than in the case without climate change.
«
If we look at consumption of coal, the main drivers are rapid
growth in clean energy,
slower power demand
growth due to shifting
economic structure and energy efficiency.
If one believes that decoupling is occurring too slowly, one may be inclined to also advocate for
slowing economic growth in wealthy nations, as Hickel suggests.
Environmentalists can rail against consumption and counsel sacrifice all they want, but neither poor countries like China nor rich countries like the United States are going to dramatically reduce their emissions
if doing so
slows economic growth.
Garnaut's report showed that
if we set a target of 550 ppm
economic growth will be
slowed by a mere 0.1 per cent, which means we would have to wait until 2042, an extra two years, before our economy doubled in size.
In what his aides called one of the most significant policy addresses of his second and final term, the mayor argued that directly taxing emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change will
slow global warming, promote
economic growth and stimulate technological innovation — even
if it results in higher gasoline prices in the short term.
If prices stay high,
economic growth will
slow, and demand for office and warehouse space will decline.»