Sentences with phrase «slower than they should»

Let's say your app is a bit slower than it should be, then the user might not come back because they're annoyed by it.
Hoffman: Look, we work on it, we may work on it slower than we should.
That being said, it did seem like the Vikings were just slower than they should have been.
Using a lower carb diet is another reason you may be dealing with a metabolism that's slower than it should be.
The bottom line is if you're not fully recovering from your workouts, you're going to gain muscle and strength slower than you should.
I'm going slower than I should, actually.
The TouchPad suffers from random freezes and applications sometimes launch or run slower than they should.
At launch, some folks saw that the game was running a little bit slower than it should have been and the graphics were not as good as expected.
Besides, his new forward smash is slower than the Shoulder Bash, and it lacks both the launch resistance and transcendent priority that it had back in Brawl.
If you find that your network is slower than it should be, it might be congested by the other networks.
In that case, xbox 360 is not the best option because when you move the stick 100 % in any diagonal, the game reads it like if you were moving it like 75 - 80 %: http://i.imgur.com/f6mAETC.png So, that will make the crosshair to move a 20 - 25 % slower than it should really move.
This is quite the capable processing package, but things tend to feel a little slower than they should at times.

Not exact matches

Buyers say better - than - expected earnings, as well as lower prices at the pump and relatively positive economic data provide three powerful catalysts that should drive a slow churn higher into the end of the year.
By 2020, job growth in the sector should have slowed to the point where there are more people looking for work in the field than there are jobs to be filled.
Rising income and rising uncertainty both suggest that we should expect higher, not lower, household savings rates, which in turn imply that household income must grow faster, not slower, than household consumption.
The ratio can be a bit higher for ETFs, which are generally slower - moving than stocks, but you should avoid ETFs trading with a Price / ATR Ratio of more than 80 - 90.
And for all the muddle, the one thing that seems clear is that the risks to the economy and particularly the labor market — which is generating solid job growth and even some wage gains (for which we should all give Chair Yellen and the Fed serious credit)-- remain «asymmetric:» there's a greater risk of needlessly slowing non-inflationary growth than there is of inflation accelerating.
Add the fact that much of the earnings - per - share growth is created by making acquisitions of slower growing, lower P / E companies, and one might think that the new, larger level of earnings should be valued at a smaller multiple than the prior earnings were.
You'll know if your marketing cycle is longer than it should be, and which stages are slowing it down.
I have enough passive income to give me peace of mind that if I lose my job my world won't get thrown upside down; I feel like I don't want much more than that runtil I retire or slow down at work, and I should be more growth focused and less income focused.
While the 41 % gain is more impressive than 11 %, investors should see this as another great quarter by Berkshire Hathaway, and one that provided no reason to think its immense success has any sign of slowing down.
The current commodity - induced profits recession may be short lived, but the real secular trend growth rate in EPS should be much slower than the past quarter - century.
Traditional manufacturing companies based in the Midwest — automakers, for example — who shoulder a greater portion of the costs of benefits have been slower than companies headquartered in other parts of the country to offer HDHPs.
But it will do so at a much slower rate than many think it should.
With populist frustration increasingly pressuring policy change around the world, investors should expect labor, tax, and interest expense to rise faster than sales, thereby depressing profit margins and slowing real growth in earnings per share over the decades ahead.
Municipal yields should rise at a slower pace than U.S. Treasury yields due to the limited supply of new municipal issues.
That's good news as slower growth in expenses than in revenue should equate to higher profitability.
Policies should be directed toward slowing the use of these resources rather than speeding up this process.
Though I still weigh much more than I should and would like to continue losing weight maybe a bit slower.
Their slow start will cause their Playoff seed to be a bit lower than it should be and because of that they may fly under the radar come the Spring..
Mertesacker is already 32 years old, and most fans think that he is becoming slower as he ages, but one of our players respects him more than any other player at the club, and when that player is Mesut Ozil perhaps we should listen to his opinion.
The Horned Frogs have played Oklahoma well under Patterson — a 20 - 17 road loss in 2013, a 24 - 17 home loss in 2012, a 35 - 10 loss in 2008 (which was closer than just about anybody else came to slowing down Oklahoma that year), a 17 - 10 win in 2005 — and should have the athletes to match up with Oklahoma's offense.
Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off
I don't care how slow Mert is, he's head and shoulders a better defender than Gabriel.
he slows the pace down and for me he should never play again, the Ox is a better midfielder than Ozil
1) GK — better 2) LB — same, possibly better if Gibbs improves, Monreal has plateaued 3) RB — better as Bellerin will only improve 4) CB first pairing — same, as the BFG is getting older but he can't get shorter or slower, 5) CB second pairing — better since we didn't have a pair last year 6) DM — better as Arteta is now back up and Coquelin should get even better 7) Box to box — better if you think Ramsey and Wilshire still have room to improve and are still being kept out by Carloza 8) LW — better, Sanchez might not get too much better but Welbeck is an improvement on Podolski 9) RW — same if Theo moves up front but Ox and Gnabry have lots of room to improve 10) CAM — same 11) Striker — better as Giroud / Theo is stronger than Giroud / Sanogo
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
He's in a slow - motion swagger, with low steps and shoulder dips, chopping the air with his right hand, holding a basketball aloft with his left — a few beats of celebration for the Sooners» senior shooting guard after sinking more than 80 % of his three - pointers over the past half hour.
Moe should be able to slow down Holiday better than anyone so far, we can then keep Bazz on Rondo which should be a decent matchup, or Moore.
Yes thats probably reason, but if you do nt attack you wont win, so there you go, our manager accepted defeat before the game, and he hoped that maybe Alexis or Ozil perform something crazy and win, thats not how team should be set up, Chelski defence is slow why not use that to our beneffit, no one said we need to have 70 % poss to win, if he was scared from counters than why did nt he surprised Mou and played his style, beat him on his own game, they did nt have strikers they couldnt hurt us, he shold have started with pace and counter their slow defence, simple logic, but it seams our manager freezed
No need getting irate, if he can take on the whole opposing team without getting injured and been out for more than half the season then he should keep doing it but its counterproductive if he keeps getting injured and also slowing down the pace of our game, this is not just about an individual, its about what effect hos style has on the team as a whole... you ever head anybody said Messi or CR7 should release the ball quicker?
The best (worst) example of when they're always under foot is when you're hightailing it to the bathroom because your baby fell asleep on you and napped for exceptionally long but you couldn't move lest you wake her so you have to run to get to the bathroom but the cat's right there moving slower than a snail moving just into the places where your next steps should be.
Don't be worried or concerned if your baby is slower than you think they should be.
I feel that if people slowed down, stopped messing around with their cell phones and payed attention to driving like they should than there would be a lot less wrecks and fatalities.
When you first start carrying your baby in a carrier, you should start out slow and not plan on wearing the carrier for more than an hour.
I also relate to wanting the relationship to end on a good note - I am a little sad that our breastfeeding relationship ended at a time when I didn't want to nurse anymore because it just HURT, rather than being the slow tapering off that I had imagined it SHOULD be.
Should that agency receive complaints of potentially unsafe conditions, such as inability to accelerate, as opposed to slower - than - expected acceleration, it may warrant a safety investigation.
Chemical reactions do slow down as the temperature drops, and according to standard calculations, the reactions that assemble cyanide molecules into amino acids and nucleobases should run a hundred thousand times more slowly at — 112 °F than at room temperature.
Currently the density of dark energy is higher than that of matter, but in the distant past the density of matter should have been greater, so the expansion should have been slowing down then.
For now, D - Wave's device is slower than an inexpensive home computer, but Rose says a potentially faster 1,000 - qubit version should be available by the end of next year.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z