Not exact matches
They predicted that the ice age had
slowed ocean circulation, trapping CO2 deep within it, and that
warmer temperatures reversed this process.
The causes of the
warming remain debated, but Liu and his team homed in on the melting glacial water that poured into
oceans as the ice receded, paradoxically
slowing the
ocean current in the North Atlantic that keeps Europe from freezing over.
Despite
slower temperature shifts in
ocean waters,
ocean life from plankton to fish have begun moving in response to global
warming
Some engineers have even proposed dumping iron into the
ocean to trigger phytoplankton blooms — a strategy that they speculate will
slow global
warming by removing carbon from the atmosphere (SN: 6/5/10, p. 16).
«I am very interested in these wind speed increases and whether they may have also played some role in
slowing down the
warming at the surface of the
ocean,» said Prof Sherwood.
It will be difficult to
slow or stop this global
warming, thanks to the
oceans, which are
warming as well.
«But the deeper
ocean shows no
slowing in
warming, and sea levels continue to rise — which we believe is still mostly down to thermal expansion,» says Rintoul.
«For the first time we can quantify how
oceans responded to
slow, natural climate
warming as the world emerged from the last ice age,» says Prof. Eric Galbraith from McGill University's Department of Earth and Oceanic Sciences, who led the study.
The shelves
slow and stabilize the glaciers behind them, but they are succumbing to a hidden force: Deep,
warming ocean currents are melting the ice from beneath.
When it comes to
slowing down global
warming, the world's
oceans — 70 percent of the planet's surface — may be Homo sapiens» best hope for a stable future.
In this sense, the
ocean has acted as a buffer to
slow down the greenhouse gas accumulation in the atmosphere and, thus, global
warming.
There also was an assumption that many melting glaciers on the ice sheet's periphery eventually would retreat to higher ground on this flat bedrock, cutting off contact with
warm ocean waters and
slowing down the ice sheet's shedding.
What scientists discovered in 2014 is that since the turn of the century,
oceans have been absorbing more of global
warming's heat and energy than would normally be expected, helping to
slow rates of
warming on land.
«We found that where
ocean temperatures
warmed beyond a certain point as we neared the equator, at about 29 degrees, the pace of larval development
slowed,» says study lead author, Dr Ian McLeod.
Scientists have discovered that rising
ocean temperatures
slow the development of baby fish around the equator, raising concerns about the impact of global
warming on fish and fisheries in the tropics.
No matter how well the world controls emissions of greenhouse gases, global climate change is inevitable, warn two new studies which take into account the
oceans»
slow response to
warming.
The observed fact that temperatures increases
slower over the
oceans than over land demonstrates that the large heat capacity of the
ocean tries to hold back the
warming of the air over the
ocean and produces a delay at the surface but nevertheless the atmosphere responds quit rapidly to increasing greenhouse gases.
In a transient situation (such as we have at present), there is a lag related to the
slow warm up of the
oceans, which implies that the temperature takes a number of decades to catch up with the forcings.
As it does so, it oxidises to CO2, dissolving in seawater or reaching the atmosphere as CO2 which causes far
slower warming, but can nevertheless contribute to
ocean acidification.
As the Arctic
warms like crazy, heat flow there
slows, thus jet streams
slow and are wavier; the same
slowing and waviness increase happens with
ocean currents.
Oceans are very
slow to respond to temperature changes, which is in part why it's so unlikely 2015 will lose the race for
warmest year.
If we go back to the coral reefs, even if I said
ocean acidification will progress
slower in the tropics, the combination of
ocean acidification and
warm temperature is a deadly recipe for corals.
In the case of
warming caused by a disproportionate increase in atmospheric CO2 (compared with oceanic CO2), an increase in temperatures only
slows down the rate at which CO2 is absorbed by the
oceans.
The longevity of global
warming (Fig. 9) and the implausibility of removing the
warming if it is once allowed to penetrate the deep
ocean emphasize the urgency of
slowing emissions so as to stay close to the 500 GtC target.
A recent slowdown in the upward march of global temperatures is likely to be the result of the
slow warming of the deep
oceans, British scientists said on Monday.
As the globe
warms, the
slow rise in
ocean levels has caused great concern.
[1] CO2 absorbs IR, is the main GHG, human emissions are increasing its concentration in the atmosphere, raising temperatures globally; the second GHG, water vapor, exists in equilibrium with water / ice, would precipitate out if not for the CO2, so acts as a feedback; since the
oceans cover so much of the planet, water is a large positive feedback; melting snow and ice as the atmosphere
warms decreases albedo, another positive feedback, biased toward the poles, which gives larger polar
warming than the global average; decreasing the temperature gradient from the equator to the poles is reducing the driving forces for the jetstream; the jetstream's meanders are increasing in amplitude and
slowing, just like the lower Missippi River where its driving gradient decreases; the larger
slower meanders increase the amplitude and duration of blocking highs, increasing drought and extreme temperatures — and 30,000 + Europeans and 5,000 plus Russians die, and the US corn crop, Russian wheat crop, and Aussie wildland fire protection fails — or extreme rainfall floods the US, France, Pakistan, Thailand (driving up prices for disk drives — hows that for unexpected adverse impacts from AGW?)
Guemas et al. (Nature Climate Change 2013) shows that the
slower warming of the last ten years can not be explained by a change in the radiative balance of our Earth, but rather by a change in the heat storage of the
oceans, and that this can be at least partially reproduced by climate models, if one accounts for the natural fluctuations associated with El Niño in the initialization of the models.
This recent
slower warming in the upper
ocean is closely related to the
slower warming of the global surface temperature, because the temperature of the overlaying atmosphere is strongly coupled to the temperature of the
ocean surface.
If it would
warm 5 degrees this century, which seem quite possible, that would be about 100 times faster than the average rate during the last deglaciation, although I suppose
ocean heat content rises somewhat
slower.
However, the
ocean is very strongly stratified, and the interaction with the bulk of the deep cold water is very
slow — it is generally the upper
ocean that determines the time scale for the transient
warming we might expect.
Their argument goes like this: It is not possible that
warming of the deep
ocean accelerates at the same time as
warming of the upper
ocean slows down, because the heat must pass through the upper layer to reach the depths.
The
oceans are
warming now but they are still a CO2 sink (hence acidification), even if the rate is
slowing.
Given that the cryosphere and
oceans are far better long - term indicators of changes in Earth's energy balance than the much more «noisy» troposphere, for anyone to suggest that the
warming of the Earth system has
slowed or stopped over the past 10 years, means they are purposely ignoring the far bigger heat sinks of the cryrosphere and
oceans, or they simply want to spout nonsense.
That the heat absorption of the
ocean as a whole (at least to 2000 m) has not significantly
slowed makes it clear that the reduced
warming of the upper layer is not (at least not much) due to decreasing heating from above, but rather mostly due to greater heat loss to lower down: through the 700 m level, from the upper to the lower layer.
With even further
warming more hydrates are released, additional global soil feedback (extreme soil respiration rates, compost bomb instability) and weathering becomes a driver, now
Ocean very stratified, maybe things like permanent El Nino, weather systems probably move very slow — everything gets stuck due to lack of perturbed ocean, no or very little frozen water at the p
Ocean very stratified, maybe things like permanent El Nino, weather systems probably move very
slow — everything gets stuck due to lack of perturbed
ocean, no or very little frozen water at the p
ocean, no or very little frozen water at the poles.
The recent
slower warming is mainly explained by the fact that in recent years the La Niña state in the tropical Pacific prevailed, in which the eastern Pacific is cold and the
ocean stores more heat (2).
Ocean serves as the memory whereby
slow oceanic Rossby waves and Kelvin waves propagate through the basin and affect the depth of the oceanic surface layer of
warm water.
It is enhanced too by the formation of deep water in the polar regions, but
slowed by the
warming of the surface
ocean.
Terrell Johnson, reporting on a recent NASA publication concluding that deep
ocean temperatures have not increased since 2005 (http://www.weather.com/science/environment/news/deep-
ocean-hasnt-warmed-nasa-20141007): «While the report's authors say the findings do not question the overall science of climate change, it is the latest in a series of findings that show global
warming to have
slowed considerably during the 21st century, despite continued rapid growth in human - produced greenhouse gas emissions during the same time.»
BUT Reversing the Atlantic
ocean current due to fresh water ice melt, is a local phenomenon, not global AND it does little to reduce the
slow steady heat / energy buildup globally — so
warming will continue.
That's for pingos underneath the
ocean, where
slow warming has thawed the seabed — which can collapse into a «moat» — but the material (brown, red arrows) being forced up from below is dense mud and rock and clathrate and ice.
@ 48 If your speculation is correct, I assume that another consequence would be that, if / when concentrations of greenhouse gases start to drop, corresponding reductions in surface
ocean / land temperatures would take place at a much
slower rate than would otherwise be the case: the surplus heat stored in the deep
ocean will gradually make its way to the
ocean surface, and continue to
warm the atmosphere for decades, if not longer.
Vertical diffusion is
slower, but happens over most of the
oceans, while downward advection of anomalously
warm water happens in fewer spots but is faster (the North Atlantic, «Mode» water formation regions north of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, shelf water formation in Antarctica).
In a transient situation (such as we have at present), there is a lag related to the
slow warm up of the
oceans, which implies that the temperature takes a number of decades to catch up with the forcings.
The latter brings a somewhat
slower warming at the surface of our planet, because more heat is stored deeper in the
ocean.
For example: 1) plants giving off net CO2 in hot conditions (r / t aborbing)-- see: http://www.climateark.org/articles/reader.asp?linkid=46488 2) plants dying out due to heat & drought & wild fires enhanced by GW (reducing or cutting short their uptake of CO2 & releasing CO2 in the process) 3)
ocean methane clathrates melting, giving off methane 4) permafrost melting & giving off methane & CO2 5) ice & snow melting, uncovering dark surfaces that absorb more heat 6) the
warming slowing the thermohaline
ocean conveyor & its up - churning of nutrients — reducing marine plant life & that carbon sink.
Until we clear up whether there has been some kind of accelerated
warming at depth in the real
ocean, I think these results serve as interesting hypotheses about why the rate of surface
warming has
slowed - down, but we still lack a definitive answer on this topic.
Even an apparent global dimming trend in the last decade has been unable to
slow the inexorable
warming of the global
oceans.
The LWR
warms the
ocean's surface skin, and
slows the escape of the solar radiation absorbed by the
ocean bulk, by reducing the convection of heat to the
ocean surface.