Sentences with phrase «small amount of warming in»

Met Office Blog — Dave Britton (10:48:21)-- 14 October 2012 «We agree with Mr Rose that there has been only a very small amount of warming in the 21st Century.

There is a small amount of warming in the short - wavelength wing of the CO2 band in the lower stratosphere.

A large body of evidence reveals that small amounts of warming in the Ocean can have large effects on ocean ecosystems.

Not exact matches

* When mixing in the tapioca starch, whisk it with a small amount of warm milk in a Pyrex cup before adding to the main mixture.

In a 10 - inch, nonstick skillet over medium flame, heat OLIVE OIL; add STEAK, BEANS, RICE, TACO SEASONING, and CHILI POWDER; heat until thoroughly warmed, stirring as needed -LCB- cooking tip: add small amounts of water to adjust consistency -RCB-

in a pan warm a small amount of coconut oil, or water if you're avoiding oil, on medium heat.

We recommend warming and offering in smaller increments and if baby is still hungry to add more milk so you can reduce the amount you have to dispose of.

The chances of your baby overheating during their sleep are small because they were designed in order to have your baby warm with just the right amount of heat.

As sea waters in the South Atlantic warm, the amount of krill available for seals drops, leading to a smaller yet more genetically varied population

Including the elevation effects in the model increases the estimated sea - level rise by a small but significant amount (5 % enhancement of melt by 2100 and 10 % by 2200 for a climate warming scenario).

It shows that changes in Earth's climate and sea level are closely linked, with only small amounts of warming needed to have a significant effect on seal levels.

I won't argue that our added gases may contribute to the warming to some very, very small degree, but keep in mind, the ash plume from a good volcanic eruption such as the last big Pinatubo eruption eclipses into insignificants the amount of pollutants added to the atmosphere by human activity.

Isn't that comment in itself ironic, considering that the current «global warming» movement began in probably much similar fashion, with small amounts of data leading to further scrutiny of future recorded data.

[emphasis added] Bast: «We believe that climate has warmed in the second half of the 20th Century, we believe that there is probably a measurable human impact on climate but it's probably very small, we think that natural forces probably overwhelm any impact that human activity can have, that computer models are too unreliable to forecast what the future might hold for climate and finally that a modest amount of warming is probably going to be, on net, beneficial both to human beings and the ecosystem.

What I Do: Serve small amounts of warmed broth in a bottle or with a spoon.

Fill your bathtub (or a large bucket) with a small amount of warm water and add two tablespoons of baking soda per liter of water in the tub.

that's okay Grease a large skillet with a generous amount of butter and heat over medium - low Pour about 1/4 c batter into the skillet ***, swirling gently for about 10 seconds, until it is evenly spread around the skillet Cook for a minute or two, watching carefully — when the edges start to brown, loosen the edges with a small spatula, and then flip Cook for another 20 - 30 seconds on the other side Remove from the skillet and place on a plate in a warm oven while you cook the other crepes.

Dissolve a teaspoon in a small amount of warm water and drink it.It takes my heartburn away for a while.

Otherwise, if you live in a particularly warm climate, you may find it helpful to add a small amount of emulsifying wax or beeswax to your neem oil body butter in order for it stay solid.

Oatmeal is another smooth and warm meal, and with a small amount of cinnamon and brown sugar may stimulate your taste buds in a similar fashion to that old cinnamon roll.

The most effective way to use a cleanser is to place a small amount in the palm of your hand and allow it to warm before gently massaging it into your skin.

I am talking about a good solid warm - up, and then a few work sets where you stay up around 90 % of 1RM in the lifts, followed by a small amount of accessory work, mainly working on treating potentially injury - prone areas, things like the posterior shoulder, lower back, hip mobility — things like this.

Along these lines, a popular and recommended weight loss tonic for those who follow an Ayurvedic diet is a small amount of raw honey in a cup of warm (not hot) water first thing in the morning to stimulate strong metabolism for the day.

This special aspect of Black Pepper is one that I've grown to really appreciate as I make tea blends since I find it is not just warming, but powerful in how it enhances the effects of the blends in small amounts

He also says that when dogs lose interest in dry food, adding warm water, chicken broth, or a small amount of canned food can make it more appealing.

Mix in a small amount of warm water (just enough to turn into a paste) prior to mixing with food or when in food dish.

With a small amount of LW penetrating into the first three meters and a normal mid-ocean Wind and Wave complex most of the radiant energy is also returned to the atmosphere if not as direct heat then in the form of warm salt aerosols?

I won't argue that our added gases may contribute to the warming to some very, very small degree, but keep in mind, the ash plume from a good volcanic eruption such as the last big Pinatubo eruption eclipses into insignificants the amount of pollutants added to the atmosphere by human activity.

The small amount of climate change in the past 150 years has been all good news: (1) We've had mild warming at night, and (2) We've had greening of our planet from more CO2 in the air.

One of the things that people (particularly from an engineering background) have trouble with is the idea that the feedback from a small amount of warming can give rise to a much larger amount of warming, and this seems, from an «enginering perspective» on the meaning of «feedback», to result in an uncontrolled «runaway» response.

A small amount of regional cooling is possible, but more likely is a relative cooling in the North Atlantic — i.e. it won't warm as fast as the rest of the planet.

Scientists (like Richard Lindzen) have a duty NOT to imply to the pubic that: 1) there is no support for the human human population being responsible for most or all of the warming in recent decades, and 2) NOT to imply that there is only a small amount of warming recently.

Isn't that comment in itself ironic, considering that the current «global warming» movement began in probably much similar fashion, with small amounts of data leading to further scrutiny of future recorded data.

(Note that radiative forcing is not necessarily proportional to reduction in atmospheric transparency, because relatively opaque layers in the lower warmer troposphere (water vapor, and for the fractional area they occupy, low level clouds) can reduce atmospheric transparency a lot on their own while only reducing the net upward LW flux above them by a small amount; colder, higher - level clouds will have a bigger effect on the net upward LW flux above them (per fraction of areal coverage), though they will have a smaller effect on the net upward LW flux below them.

This would actually not be true at sufficiently high latitudes in the winter hemisphere, except that some circulation in the upper atmosphere is driven by kinetic energy generated within the troposphere (small amount of energy involved) which, so far as I know, doesn't result in much of a global time average non-radiative energy flux above the tropopause, but it does have important regional effects, and the result is that the top of the stratosphere is warmer than the tropopause at all latitudes in all seasons so far as I know.

About 1980ish, some old ideas like the greenhouse effect were brought out of mothballs and re-examined with new tools and techniques; simultaneously several researchers and theoreticians released their notes, published, or otherwise got together and there was a surprising consilience and not a small amount of mixing with old school hippy ecologism on some of the topics that became the roots of Climate Change science (before it was called Global Warming); innovations in mathematics were also applied to climate thought; supercomputers (though «disappointing» on weather forecasting) allowed demonstration of plausibility of runaway climate effects, comparison of scales of effects, and the possibility of climate models combined with a good understanding of the limits of predictive power of weather models.

John Carter August 8, 2014 at 12:58 am chooses to state his position on the greenhouse effect in the following 134 word sentence: «But given the [1] basics of the greenhouse effect, the fact that with just a very small percentage of greenhouse gas molecules in the air this effect keeps the earth about 55 - 60 degrees warmer than it would otherwise be, and the fact that through easily recognizable if [2] inadvertent growing patterns we have at this point probably at least [3] doubled the total collective amount in heat absorption and re-radiation capacity of long lived atmospheric greenhouse gases (nearly doubling total that of the [4] leading one, carbon dioxide, in the modern era), to [5] levels not collectively seen on earth in several million years — levels that well predated the present ice age and extensive earth surface ice conditions — it goes [6] against basic physics and basic geologic science to not be «predisposed» to the idea that this would ultimately impact climate.»

What is particularly galling to me is when my colleagues predict all sorts of adverse health consequences from a small amount of warming and greening of the planet, when the reverse is far more likely, and when health and life expectancy always rise hand - in - hand with the deployment of reliable, affordable fossil fuel energy.

Conceptually — small changes in conditions precipitate non-linear responses in the system and the system shifts into a «new» state that is either warmer or cooler by amounts that, because of multiple negative and positive feedbacks, bear no linear relationships to the original control variable.

And remember, the satellite data are one small part of a vast amount of data that overwhelmingly show our planet is warming up: retreating glaciers, huge amounts of ice melting at both poles, the «death spiral» of arctic ice every year at the summer minimum over time, earlier annual starts of warm weather and later starts of cold weather, warming oceans, rising sea levels, ocean acidification, more extreme weather, changing weather patterns overall, earlier snow melts, and lower snow cover in the spring...

I am yet to hear scientific evidence to satisfy me that if the very, very small amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (approximately 0.38 per cent) was increased, it could lead to significant global warming.

Accordingly, controlling emissions in small as well as large amounts is essential to prevent, slow the pace of, reduce the threats from, and mitigate global warming and its adverse effects.

Because our excess heat is concentrated in what amounts to point sources, and those point sources are almost invariably located near to the temperature monitoring sites, you may want be a little kinder to Phillip and his opinion that waste heat accounts for a significant amount of our «warming» unless you have convincing evidence that the heat is dissipated so rapidly that its net effect is smaller than our ability to detect.

warm (like the 1400's when Greenland got it's name) is good and it comes from solar activity... not from the gases in the atmosphere that are small contributors to the overall amount of warmth in the air.

A small amount of gold salted in a small area yeilds great results for speculators in the same a way a small amount of proxy warming (up to about 1960) in one or two trees in a small area like Yamal has resulted in a «gold rush» of billions of dollars in AGW business.

A relatively small amount of initial warming can be greatly magnified in the Far North.

In short, the initial warming was indeed triggered by the Milankovitch cycles, and that small amount of orbital cycle - caused warming eventually triggered the CO2 release, which caused most of the glacial - interglacial warming.

Also, the effect of CO2 lessens with the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, so that future warming might be very much smaller than current warming due to CO2.

It will become increasingly clear in the next few years that global temperatures have not warmed significantly since about 1980, and the small amount of observed atmospheric warming was primarily due to the natural recovery after the temporary cooling effect of two major volcanoes, El Chichon in 1982 and Pinatubo in 1991 +.

When the Milankovitch cycles cause a small amount of warming, it leads to an increase in the CO2 content of the atmosphere.