Sentences with phrase «small claims decision»

Not exact matches

«After years of claiming the OPEL business was critical to the company's global platform strategy in small cars and diesel engines (while suffering billions on losses), the company surprised the market with its decision to completely exit,» wrote Jonas.

What I should claim, however, is that in a manner appropriate to the particular level and in a fashion suitable for the particular occasion, however «large» or «small», there is such «decision» as entails a «cutting off» of this or that possibility for actualization and an «acceptance» of this or that other possibility.

In January 2012, in a speech in Strasburg, Prime Minister David Cameron set out an agenda for reforming the ECtHR which would reduce the number of admissible cases, and thus the backlog, by ensuring that the Court did not act as a small claims court or Court of Fourth Instance and did not go over national decisions where it did not need to.

If you used the airline's ADR scheme and you're not happy with the outcome... The adjudicator's decision is only binding on the airline, not on you, so if you're unhappy with the outcome you could consider taking your case to the small claims court.

Writing in the Berkshire Eagle, Joseph Thompson, the director of Mass MoCA, the most important museum in western Massachusetts, defended the decision of the Berkshire Museum, claiming that it faced a crisis and needed the money to focus on its core collection of thousands of scientific and natural history artifacts, instead of its relatively small art collection.

Thanks to Trump's controversial decision to champion coal and quit the Paris agreement in 2020, the official delegation from Washington is the smallest ever sent to climate change talks — and the most controversial, with one Trump adviser set to claim coal and other fossil fuels can curb global warming.

The proposed changes include: applying acts that affect litigation in court to litigation in the CRT, setting time limits for judicial reviews, ensuring that the CRT decisions are enforceable by the courts and establishing the CRT as an expert tribunal for all matters except general small claims and motor vehicle liability issues.

I don't now know if there's ever been a decision explaining what «good conscience» means for the purposes of Small Claims Court jurisdiction.

It is important to note that the decision was by a deputy judge (i.e. practitioner sitting as judge in small claims) and pretty well worthless as a precedent.

To learn more about this process, visit Small Claims — Objecting a Magistrate's Decision.

Decisions on costs from the Ontario Small Claims Court are rare.

(For some kinds of cases — including foreclosure judgments, small claims, and traffic court appeals — you must ask to appeal within 14 days of the decision.

The Courts of Nova Scotia provide Twitter feeds on the Court decisions webpage for decisions newly released from the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, Provincial Court and Small Claims Court.

The process by which legal decisions are made is the same for any size of claim, whether it concerns a small fund or a very large settlement.

The recent decision of the European Court of Justice in Pannon v Gyorfi C - 243 / 08 will have major implications for the trial of small and not so small claims.

A Deputy Small Claims Court Judge who made the decision to allow a trial to continue on its second day notwithstanding that one of the parties failed to show up has been overturned by the Divisional Court.

You can choose whether to be a tenant or a lawyer and are then taken through a decision tree similar in essence to the small claims example above.

But if the claim is in the thousands, hiring an attorney for full representation in small claims court or even hiring one for a consultation may be the best decision a pro se litigant will make in their case.

As mentioned above, the case concerned an appeal by the employer, Select Wine Merchants, from the decision of Small Claims Court Deputy Judge Richardson, who awarded the respondent employee four months» pay in lieu of notice.

Longmore and McFarlane LJJ said: «While we would not wish to incorporate all the learning about wasted costs orders into decisions under CPR part 27.14 (2)(g), we think that the above dictum should give sufficient guidance on the word «unreasonably» to district judges and circuit judges dealing with cases allocated to the small claims track.

In some internet forum I encountered a lawyer in California who didn't know that in some states besides his own, a losing plaintiff can appeal from the decision of a small claims court.

While not providing a great deal of added nuance, the Small Claims Court's decision in Connolly v. Telus Communications Co., [2012] O.J. No. 464, does provide some new insights.

No doubt a similar process will apply for appeals of CRT decisions made under its function as an alternative to small claims matters.

The DIFC offers an electronically - sophisticated small claims court that hears claims of up to $ 150,000 (more if the parties agree) and resolves 90 per cent of disputes within four weeks, either by mediation or a written published decision.

The appeals to the Ontario Court of Appeal in the Szilvasy and Collett claims against Reliance Home Comfort for damages arising from leaking hot water tanks were heard on October 23, 2012 and the decisions were released on November 27, 2012.1 These claims are among the very few that have traveled from Small Claims Court all the way to the Court of Aclaims against Reliance Home Comfort for damages arising from leaking hot water tanks were heard on October 23, 2012 and the decisions were released on November 27, 2012.1 These claims are among the very few that have traveled from Small Claims Court all the way to the Court of Aclaims are among the very few that have traveled from Small Claims Court all the way to the Court of AClaims Court all the way to the Court of Appeal.

A recent Ontario decision has affirmed the principle that all claims for damage caused by a tenant during a tenancy must proceed before the Landlord and Tenant Board (the «Board») and not in the Superior or Small Claims cclaims for damage caused by a tenant during a tenancy must proceed before the Landlord and Tenant Board (the «Board») and not in the Superior or Small Claims cClaims courts.

[10] The burden is on claimants to evaluate their claims prior to commencement and to justify their decision if they recover less than the Small Claims Court limit, currently $ 25,000: Reimann at parclaims prior to commencement and to justify their decision if they recover less than the Small Claims Court limit, currently $ 25,000: Reimann at parClaims Court limit, currently $ 25,000: Reimann at para. 38.

In his decision, the Small Claims Court Judge described a number of acts or omissions that could amount to insubordination, recklessness and / or gross negligence: issuing incorrect status certificates, delays in preparing banking documents for signature, late payments, failure to provide reports to the Board.

If you have been to Small Claims Court but do not agree with the judge's decision, you may want to appeal it.

Approximately 70 % of the claims that make it this far are denied and a very small percentage receive an FDC decision that results in an award.

This is especially important after a recent Small Claims Court decision.

A multiplicity of proceedings with conflicting decisions would not result from the actions being conducted in different courts because the misrepresentation action relies on a different set of facts and a different body of law than the Small Claims Court actions

In 8518076 Canada Inc. v. Quiznos Canada Restaurant Corporation, a March 6, 2018 decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the motion judge refused to stay or transfer to the Superior Court in Toronto two Small Claims Court Ottawa actions that the franchisee, 851, commenced against Quiznos Canada.

On average, it takes 14 months to get a trial decision in BC Small Claims Court.

In a recent Small Claims Court decision, MTCC No. 659 v. Truman, the Court considered whether a condo corporation could charge an owner for disproportionate and excessive use of water in the owner's unit.

Recent work includes acting for representative beneficiaries in a claim for directions as to whether the trustees could take into account the compensation recoverable from the PPF when making decisions relating to assets of the scheme, and acting in a claim concerning an alleged breach of duty on the part of trustees of a small self administered scheme.

You would not expect Dubai's bid to become a global judicial decision hub in commercial disputes to have much relevance for the Online Solutions Court for small claims proposed for England and Wales.

The recent decision of the Divisional Court in Ontario about community involvement of a Small Claims court judge takes a different approach to community involvement.

The decision has been criticized by Dennis Buchanan as being unrealistic for Small Claims court judges who live and work in the legal community:

A recent lower court decision in Ontario (Robinson v Lepage, 2015 ONSC 3128) found that a paralegal firm's online donation to a part - time Small Claims court judge for a charity bike race raised a reasonable apprehension of bias.

Louise Hamel, manager of the Judges» Library for Ontario Courts, just announced to Canadian legal publishers that beginning January 2, 2010, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice will assign a neutral citation to their decisions, except for the Small Claims Court.

It appears from a careful reading of the decision that the Small Claims court judge did not directly solicit the paralegal firm.

In Wissing et al. v. Adtran Networks Canada Inc., (unreported) a recent Ottawa decision of the Ontario Superior Court, Small Claims Division, the Court considered the following question:

On average, it takes more than one year to receive a trial decision in BC's Small Claims Court.

Displeased with this decision, the Plaintiff sued the Defendants in small claims court asking the Court to decide the issue of liability.

Swern v Amazon Hardwood Centre Inc, 2015 ONSC 7590 [Swern] is a Small Claims Court decision appealed by the Defendants to the Divisional Court on a number of well - reasoned points of law and fact.

, the decision to file and proceed in small claims versus supreme court is a tactical one.

Data.gov.bc.ca doesn't have an obvious dataset, but we can at least see what CanLII has to show about published decisions from the small claims division.

Pension claim fall - out from the Barber decision, tax planning under challenge from a cash - starved government, commercial property fraud, possible fall - out from securitisation of residential mortgages — the terms of which may be subject to severe challenge from insurers of small firms — and mergers and acquisitions which have turned out to be bad deals, are all building up a head of steam, not only in the UK but on the continent, where claims against law firms have traditionally been almost non-existent.

I had someone faced with this situation, (incorrect toll free number supplied by the Adjudicator) apply to Small Claims Court which he did, and the evidence presented was overwhelmingly on his side not the landlords, and the trial judge had to take time out to consult before he made his decision, and came back quite upset to report that there was NO APPEAL possible from a Residential Tenancy Act tribunal decision other than by launching a court action in BC Provincial Court....