For example,
small differences in temperature across the sky show where parts of the universe were denser, eventually condensing into galaxies and galactic clusters.
Because winter temperatures in the Sierra Nevada mountains are often near the thawing threshold,
a small difference in the temperature of passing weather systems often determines whether precipitation falls as snow or rain.
Not exact matches
The graph by
temperature is interesting although it's still a
small sample size of games for a relatively
small difference in winning percentage.
Most of the 2 billion or so nerve endings
in the outermost layer of our skin sense pain; those dedicated to
temperature allow us to detect
differences as
small as 0.01 degree Fahrenheit.
In winter, the effect was smaller but snow cover played a role in an average 2 degree temperature difference between urban and rural area
In winter, the effect was
smaller but snow cover played a role
in an average 2 degree temperature difference between urban and rural area
in an average 2 degree
temperature difference between urban and rural areas.
In other words, the average temperature, minimum temperature, and high temperature in a GW world would tend to be higher than it currently is, but the difference between avg & min and avg & max would be smaller than it currently i
In other words, the average
temperature, minimum
temperature, and high
temperature in a GW world would tend to be higher than it currently is, but the difference between avg & min and avg & max would be smaller than it currently i
in a GW world would tend to be higher than it currently is, but the
difference between avg & min and avg & max would be
smaller than it currently is.
A 100 mile (161 km) grid, for example, might not capture the climate effects of a
small mountain range rising out of the eastern Montana plains or the climate
differences between mountain summits and valleys
in western Montana where
temperature and precipitation vary greatly.
Schmittner et al hints that a comparable change will not take too many degrees Celsius, as the
temperature difference to LGM is
smaller than
in other estimates.
(Each agency that keeps such a
temperature record handles the data slightly differently, which can lead to
small differences in monthly and yearly values, though the overall trend is
in broad agreement for all such agencies.)
Temperature differences between seasons are much
smaller than those expected
in continental Portugal, with milder winters and cooler summers than Lisbon.
There is a
difference between peaks and valleys
in noisy processes (1998 surface air
temperature, 2007 record minimum ice, or shipping at a few
small areas on the edges of the Arctic ocean) and CO2 forcing driven trends, especially when different measures.
Given that
small difference you would have to have two boxes at the same time, not the same box at diffent times, cause normal variations
in temperature from day to day would swamp your results.
But this is over ~ 30C
temperature difference; over a couple of degrees the
difference in the average is going to be pretty
small.
The
difference in the LGM cooling seems to be mostly due to
smaller estimates of SST [sea surface
temperature] change (i.e., the new MARGO reconstruction).
That means saturation will not have occured; the OLR brightness
temperature will be larger than the skin
temperature, though the
difference will be
smaller for intensities
in nearly horizontal directions — not just because the skin layer is colder but because some portion of the atmosphere below that is colder (the
temperature will gradually approach the skin
temperature going upward from the «photosphere» (effective emitting level) as you would call it
in analogy with the sun).
If a doubling of CO2 resulted
in a
temperature increase of approximately 1 K before any non-Planck feedbacks (before water vapor, etc.), then assuming the same climate sensitivity to the total GHE, removing the whole GHE would result
in about a (setting the TOA / tropopause distinction aside, as it is relatively
small relative to the 155 W / m2 value) 155/3.7 * 1 K ~ = 42 K. Which is a bit more than 32 or 33 K, though I'm not surprised by the
difference.
The
difference in radiant flux will be
smaller between 222 K and 255 K, and larger between 288 K and 321 K, and it will take a greater GHE TOA forcing to reduce the effective radiating
temperature (the
temperature of a blackbody that would emit a radiative flux) at TOA from 288 K to 277 K as it would to reduce it from 277 K to 266 K, etc..
An important point is that the
temperature difference between lower latitudes and the Arctic (at least for land based) is
smaller now than
in the 1930 - 1940's.
As we only have one instrumental
temperature trend, the
difference between the two estimates for solar sensitivities means that a larger influence must be compensated by a
smaller influence of the GHG / aerosol tandem, to fit the
temperature trend
in the past century...
That doesn't show any inconsistency
in the method used, only that
smaller differences in solar reconstruction need larger factors to explain the reconstructed
temperature.
As the surface of the Earth and the atmosphere above have a
small temperature difference (to be shown
in a later article), there is little energy transfer between the two.
The
difference between ideal rural sites compared to urban sites
in temperature trends has been very
small:
Also as an outsider and independent journalist
in this matter, I would have expected Revkin to see the real issue of quality control being the essence of the matter (and its implications) and not any
small difference in global
temperature trends.
The overall level of consistency between attribution results derived from different models (as shown
in Figure 9.9), and the ability of climate models to simulate large - scale
temperature changes during the 20th century (Figures 9.5 and 9.6), indicate that such model
differences are likely to have a relatively
small impact on attribution results of large - scale
temperature change at the surface.
This very
small reduction
in speed makes no
difference to
temperatures of the atmosphere because times are so very short.
That may not sound like much, but the
temperature difference between today's world and the last ice age was about 5C, so seemingly
small changes
in temperature can mean big
differences for the Earth.
Obviously the air
temperature difference between warmer
in 1998 vs cooler
in 2007 and 2008 was a much
smaller factor that the cooler water
in 1998 vs warmer water
in 2007 and 2008.
Considering the
difference in potential impacts between 1.5 C and 2C of warming, using SRM for a relatively
small reduction
in temperatures would still have clear benefits, the paper notes.
Increasing evidence of
small aerosol forcing supports the importance of internal variability
in explaining inter hemispheric
differences in temperature variability.
As can be easily seen
in this chart, the Earth is rapidly warming up from the NH winter, but the
difference from the average
temperature is very
small.
When a
small rise
in temperature in the ocean makes a big
difference in CO2.»
The rise
in global
temperatures is already close enough to 1.5 C that
small differences in calculations have a big impact.
«Four other groups have analysed the Earth's surface
temperature and their results agree with our finding; the
small differences in values and ranking are expected because of the
small uncertainty
in each group's results.»
The
temperature difference between the Venusian day and night is quite
small even though the Venusian day is over a 100 Earth days
in length.
Hey, it made a
difference in weather station white boxes, making a
difference in whether Whitewash or Latex paint was used, and the
small difference in measured
temperatures after converting to the newer latex paint.
I don't understand Paul Birch to disagree with the interpretation as I stated it
in the last sentence, but he objects to my calling such a
small kinetic - energy
difference a
temperature difference.
Is not it the case that had Parker seen an even
small but significant
difference in his windy versus calm trendlines, he would have had a calibration problem
in relating the trend line
differences to a degree
temperature UHI effect?
Also Wentz neglects the fact that
small changes
in relative humidity or
difference between surface and near air
temperatures can result
in large changes
in evaporation rates based on their equation (1) which determines evaporation rate.
The White House notes that «even
small differences from seasonal average
temperatures result
in illness and death.
I used the word «consistent» because observational data are not yet accurate enough to prove the existence of an imbalance (e.g. 0.9 W / m ^ 2) capable of significant
temperature effect but too
small to be precisely estimated as the exact
difference between two large numbers
in the range of 239 W / m ^ 2.
The
difference is
smaller than the uncertainty
in comparing the
temperatures of recent years, putting them into a statistical tie.
Since the rate of heat loss of the hot reservoir is monotonic
in the
temperature difference of the cold reservoir it is coupled to, since this
difference is
smaller, it loses heat more slowly.
My point at that time was that the number of CRN 1 and CRN 2 stations was very
small and that given the noisy data for
temperature trends amongst even closer spaced stations meant that
in order to see a statistically significant
difference due to CRN rating would require a very large
difference in trends or a larger number of stations
in those classifications.
The research, detailed Monday
in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, lays bare how even seemingly
small increases
in average
temperatures can make a big
difference to the extreme weather that people experience.
We realize that the clear - sky fluxes with reference constituents will be very similar
in all runs, but as land
temperatures can adjust to constituent changes there may be some
small differences so that these diagnostics will still be useful to ensure that the AIE is as clearly isolated as possible.
Early comparisons of MMTS readings with
temperature measurements from the traditional liquid -
in - glass thermometers mounted
in Cotton Region shelters showed
small but significant
differences.
And the
differences in temperature trend are very
small between the groups.
Observations show a northward shift
in the jet stream is related to the
smaller temperature difference between the equator and the poles.
Urban to non-urban
differences are also typically largest during the evening, decline slightly by the time of minimum
temperature in the early morning and are much
smaller during the day (Figure 11).
There may be a
small difference in resistance if higher
temperatures in the ionosphere have an effect on outward radiation (despite the extremely low density) comparable to a charged grid
in a vacuum tube.