Sentences with phrase «small differences in response»

2) trace gases play a large role in these layers 3) differences in trace gases [CO2, CFCs, H2O] mean small differences in response

Not exact matches

We received over 2,600 responses from current and aspiring business owners and found that women business owners have significant differences from their male counterparts, especially when it comes to their demographics, challenges they face and their confidence in the current state of small business.

As a result, Christians are Invited to deal hopefully with a partly open future in which even small responses can make a difference.

«The difference in structure is comparatively small, yet it has an enormous influence on the immune response,» Götz says.

They found small but significant and systematic differences in the responses: there was more stereotyping in the disorderly areas than the clean ones.

While the observed differences of the individual steps were mostly modest, mathematical modeling suggested that even small delays in the trafficking of these immune cells will lead to reduced initiation of a WNV - specific antibody - response during the early stages after infection.

Sex differences in heat loss responses are dependent on body size and not sex, meaning that larger individuals sweat more than smaller ones during cycle exercise in warm and tolerable conditions.

Dr. Davis states: «Small changes in wheat protein structure can spell the difference between a devastating immune response to wheat protein versus no immune response at all.»

«Small changes in wheat protein structure can spell the difference between a devastating immune response to wheat protein versus no immune response at all,» Davis writes.

The mechanisms responsible for a greater weight loss with the B2 regimen may be the trend toward a smaller decrease in REE with B2 that we measured (although the difference between regimens did not reach the threshold for statistical significance), together with a greater thermogenic response of larger meals, as documented by others [11].

In small groups of no more than six people — small enough so that everyone will participate and not just observe — ask the teachers to talk about the similarities or differences that they see between your and their responses.

2010 The Artist's Museum: L.A. Artists 1980 - 2010, Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles, CA Inquiring Eyes: Greensboro Collects Art, Weatherspoon Art Museum, Greensboro, NC XIV International Sculpture Biennale of Carrara, Carrara, Italy 11th Triennale für Kleinplastik (Triennial of small scale sculpture), Fellbach, Germany Contemplating the Void, Guggenheim Museum, New York, NY First Nations / Second Nature, curated by Candice Hopkins, Audain Gallery, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada Kurt, Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, WA XIV International Sculpture Biennale of Carrara, Carrara, Italy Larger than Life, Stranger than Fiction: 11th Fellbach Triennial of Small Scale Sculpture, Fellbach, Germany Photography, Paula Cooper Gallery, New York, NY Earthworks: Robert Smithson, Sam Durant, and Mary Brogger, Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago, IL Shut Your Eyes in Order to See, Praz Delavallade, Paris, France Repetition island, Centre Pompidou, Paris, France Elizabeth Catlett: Call and Response, curated by Isolde Brielmaier, The Bronx Museum of the Arts, Bronx, NY The Narcissism of Minor Differences, curated by Christopher Whittey and Gerald Ross, Maryland Institute College of Art, Baltimore, MD To the Arts, Citismall scale sculpture), Fellbach, Germany Contemplating the Void, Guggenheim Museum, New York, NY First Nations / Second Nature, curated by Candice Hopkins, Audain Gallery, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada Kurt, Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, WA XIV International Sculpture Biennale of Carrara, Carrara, Italy Larger than Life, Stranger than Fiction: 11th Fellbach Triennial of Small Scale Sculpture, Fellbach, Germany Photography, Paula Cooper Gallery, New York, NY Earthworks: Robert Smithson, Sam Durant, and Mary Brogger, Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago, IL Shut Your Eyes in Order to See, Praz Delavallade, Paris, France Repetition island, Centre Pompidou, Paris, France Elizabeth Catlett: Call and Response, curated by Isolde Brielmaier, The Bronx Museum of the Arts, Bronx, NY The Narcissism of Minor Differences, curated by Christopher Whittey and Gerald Ross, Maryland Institute College of Art, Baltimore, MD To the Arts, CitiSmall Scale Sculpture, Fellbach, Germany Photography, Paula Cooper Gallery, New York, NY Earthworks: Robert Smithson, Sam Durant, and Mary Brogger, Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago, IL Shut Your Eyes in Order to See, Praz Delavallade, Paris, France Repetition island, Centre Pompidou, Paris, France Elizabeth Catlett: Call and Response, curated by Isolde Brielmaier, The Bronx Museum of the Arts, Bronx, NY The Narcissism of Minor Differences, curated by Christopher Whittey and Gerald Ross, Maryland Institute College of Art, Baltimore, MD To the Arts, Citizens!

[Response: the difference is that climate * isn't * sensitive to small perturbations in its initial conditions (or at least, it is believed to be so).

The instantaneous RF difference between the tropopause and TOA is the instantaneous forcing on the stratosphere RFs1; if the TOA forcing is smaller than the tropopause forcing, then the forcing on the stratosphere is negative, which means that the stratosphere will cool (this doesn't necessarily mean it will cool everywhere, but the equilibrium response to negative stratospheric RF requires a negative PR+CR response — being the stratosphere, at least in the global time average, CR can be approximated as zero).

Thus, if the CO2 band center is sufficiently close to saturation at TRPP, the forcing per doubling will be smaller at TOA, implying some cooling of the space in between (equal to the difference in forcing between TRPP and TOA; the climatic response will, via cooling, reduce the fluxes out of the stratosphere by the same amount; some fraction of this can go into the troposphere, and since it is a reduced downward flux, it cancels out some of the initial TRPP forcing, resulting in a smaller TRPP forcing (the forcing with stratospheric adjustment) that the surface + troposphere must respond to.

However, taking account of sampling uncertainty (as most more recent detection and attribution studies do, including those shown in Figure 9.9) makes relatively little difference to estimates of attributable warming rates, particularly those due to greenhouse gases; the largest differences occur in estimates of upper bounds for small signals, such as the response to solar forcing (Allen and Stott, 2003; Stott et al., 2003a).

However, the separation of greenhouse gas response from the responses to other external forcing in a multi-fingerprint analysis introduces a small uncertainty, illustrated by small differences in results between three models (Figure 9.21).

It is not known to what extent these differences in land - surface response translate into differences in global climate sensitivity (see Chapter 8, Section 8.5.4.3) although the uncertainty associated with the land - surface response must be smaller than the uncertainty associated with clouds (Lofgren, 1995).

[Response: Dear Isaac, you've got a potentially valid point, that hinges on the question which we have not really clarified yet: how important are differences in temperature, and how important is the absolute value of temperature (which does come in due to all the non-linearities, e.g. Clausius - Clapeyron, which are not just small second - order effects).

Although the Hansen 2005 results were based on the behaviour of a single GCM, they were generally supported in AR5, which concluded that ERF is a better measure than RF of the eventual GMST response, especially for aerosols, although in most cases the difference was small.

Smaller differences in relative incomes are likely to have important consequences for the perception of climate vulnerability and for the pattern of response.