Not exact matches
In matters of truth and justice, there is no
difference between large and
small problems, for issues concerning the
treatment of people are all the same.
Of course, it is not always practical to allow your child to plan her own
treatment, but if you can allow her to even make a
small decision (like setting up her next appointment), it may make a big
difference in allowing her to feel
in control.
They appear to be related to
differences in interpretation of INDCs, assumptions about other countries, level of disaggregation for
small countries, choice of global warming potentials to compute carbon dioxide equivalent emissions,
treatment of emissions related to land use, and
treatment of international aviation and maritime shipping.
Findings suggest substantial improvement via an intensive approach for young children with autism; however, important
differences in group assignment at baseline, difficulties with systematic measurement overtime, the lack of reported
treatment fidelity or adherence characteristics, and the
small number of children
in the comparison group limit interpretation of these findings.
An inspection of the mean plots (see Fig. 2) indicated that the
differences in scores over time for the low CU group was
smaller than the
differences in scores over time for the high CU group, suggesting that the high CU group demonstrated more change (i.e., improvement) on these scales with
treatment.
Limitations include relatively
small sample size, concerns about generalizability to other locations, that participants completed less than 50 % of the available sessions, and
differences in the fidelity ratings between the three
treatments.
Results indicate that both the TF - CBT group and the EMDR group improved on the PTSD measure after
treatment; the
difference in improvement between the groups was
small and not statistically significant.