Sentences with phrase «small effect sizes when»

The evidence base suggests that while Responding in Peaceful and Positive Ways (RIPP) showed promising results with urban African American school children (see Study 1), the program showed inconsistent results with small effect sizes when administered to schools in a rural setting with majority white schoolchildren (see Study 2).

Not exact matches

«When small molecules are administered, they can stick to many different proteins in the body because their size enables them to interact with many targets, not just the intended target, causing more side effects.»

When other factors are taken into account, higher spending and smaller class sizes seem to correspond to inferior mathematics and science results, though the overall effect is relatively small.

Take memorisation, when you first encounter something memorisation has a very, very small effect size.

As per the American Statistical Association's (ASA) recently released «Statement on P - Values,» statistical significance «is not equivalent to scientific, human, or economic significance... Any effect, no matter how tiny, can produce a small p - value [i.e., «statistical significance»] if the sample size or measurement precision is high enough» (p. 10); hence, one must always check for practical significance when making claims about statistical significance, like Kane et al. actually do here, but do here in a similar inflated vein.

«When you have really small sample sizes, you should just be looking at main average effect across all neighbouring schools,» she said.

Thus caution should be taken when interpreting effect sizes from small samples (< 30).

So when an American - Swiss finance professor Rolf Banz analyzed the size effect of small cap stocks in 1982, among the paper's...

I mentioned that when the puppy or kittens small size is related to defects in its pituitary gland, it could be the combined effect of a lack of thyroid stimulating hormone or a lack of growth hormone or a lack of both that keeps it small.

It is quite common for important effects to be visible only when elements get down to some small - enough size, which of course requires more of them, and more compute power.

In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance.

Indeed, when it comes to family planning and unrestricted access to modern contraception (and the unhindered agency to use a preferred method of contraception), things like misinformation about side - effects, lack of knowledge about the benefits of small family - size, and religious or male opposition to contraception form a sort of scaffolding that keep fertility rates higher than they would otherwise be.

1) the studies conducted in a field are smaller; 2) when effect sizes are smaller; 3) when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; 4) where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; 5) when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and 6) when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance.»

In other words, a rain cloud would hypothetically form when conditions are right in any event, but, when there are more cosmic rays, the cloud would not rain out until later in the day because the smaller initial droplet size would affect how long the droplets take to coalesce into the size necessary for rain to happen or something to that effect.

This does make images pop a bit more on smaller screens, but when viewed full - screen on a plus - sized phone, the effect is a bit overdone.

Although average differences between depressive symptoms of children with and without chronic physical illnesses are small to very small in a statistical sense, most effect sizes are practically meaningful when using Cohen's criteria for interpreting effect sizes or the BESD.

The size of the CfC impacts on most outcomes was small, but can be considered positive relative to what was observed in the early phase of the UK Sure Start evaluation.3 The current results are also comparable in size to those found in the later impact evaluation of the Sure Start programme, in which 3 - year - old children were exposed to mature SSLP throughout their entire lives.4 Reviews of the effectiveness of early childhood interventions have found that most studies reported effect sizes on parenting and child outcomes that were small to moderate.14 15 When comparing CfC and SSLP with other interventions, it is important to remember that the evaluations of these interventions measured effects on an entire population, rather than on programme participants, as is the case in the evaluation of many other interventions.

A meta - analysis of interventions with carers of patients with cancer concluded that small - to - medium effect sizes were appropriate for measuring psychological outcomes.15 Further research using adequately powered RCTs is needed to establish: when support should be provided, how to assess carer needs, and how to provide effective psychosocial support to carers.15 — 18

It's also an appropriate design for studies with small sample sizes that may not have the desired power for the statistical analysis to detect an effect when there is one.

More specifically, when parents are more supportive and less authoritarian, their children's verbal and intelligence scores are higher, when examined prospectively.12, 13 Similarly, small to medium effect sizes have been found through meta - analysis for the relationship between mother - child attachment and children's peer relations, 14 and there is evidence that attachment style predicts differing trajectories in terms of the child's emotion regulation.15

When observing associations between processed food and emotional difficulties for EOP only, consumption (prenatal, 3 years) of one or more servings per day of processed food was associated with higher early - adolescent emotional difficulties compared to those who consumed less than one servings per day (p < 0.01, Fig. 2b), with small overall (η p 2 = 0.01) and medium between group (G = 0.38, Supplementary Table S2) effect sizes.