I believe because of
the small equity component (0 % to 30 %) in Aggresive MIPs they can offer a good return in debt portfolio with low risk which makes it better than Balanced Equity Funds and Debt Funds on either side of investments.
Thanks for prompt response Vipin My goal is to distribute my Debt portfolio from Bank FDs Debt funds are as good as FD but with TAX benefit I beleive because of
the small equity component (0 % to 30 %) in Aggresive MIPs they can offer a good return in debt portfolio with low risk which makes it better than Balanced Equity Funds and Debt Funds on eiher side of investments Hence I believe along with Bank FDs, Debt Mutual Funds a person should also diverisfy and invest in Agrresive MIPs as one of the debt instruments
I believe because of
the small equity component -LRB--LSB-...]
Not exact matches
The
equity components can be subdivided further into large - and
small - cap stocks, and value and growth stocks.
There is no question that there is support in historical data for slicing and dicing
equity components into
small and value.
The Other
component in the chart collectively represents additional six
equity ETFs with
smaller average weights.
Not only will this give you an idea of how much you should consider to have invested in
equities, it may also help you determine how to diversify between different
components of the
equity markets (
small versus large, domestic versus international).
When
equity is a
small component as a percentage of market value,
equities will return better than when it is a big
component.
A monthly income plan is predominantly a debt fund with a
small sliver of
equity (15 - 25 per cent) whereas an
equity - savings fund has a higher
equity component (around 30 - 35 per cent)