Sentences with phrase «small heating effect»

Increased solar activity acts directly on the Earth with a small increase in radiation, a small heating effect and an associated increase in evaporation.

An analogy I have seen on a NOAA (or it might have been NASA) website is that it's a bit like a small candle in a very large room: the candle is certainly hot, but the size of the flame is so small any heating effect in the room is overwhelmed by the other factors affecting the system.

Not exact matches

That's a big problem as devices get ever smaller: at the nano - scale, weird quantum effects mean it becomes hard to predict where molecules will shed heat.

The anomaly is about a 10 billionth of the acceleration due to gravity on earth, so it's a 10 - billionth g of a g force, so it's a very, very small effect you're looking for and the kick you get, the rebound you get from light and heat coming off the spacecraft, is also very, very small.

Small heat shock proteins can counteract this effect.

Alternatively, micro explosions, termed nanoflares — too small and frequent to detect individually, but with a large collective effect — might release heat into the corona.

Jerry Goldsmith (1968) **** Bangkok Dangerous Brian Tyler (2008) *** The Banner Saga Austin Wintory (2014) **** Basic Instinct Jerry Goldsmith (1992) ***** Basic Instinct 2 John Murphy (2006) *** Batman Danny Elfman (1989) **** Batman Returns Danny Elfman (1992) ** Batman Begins Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard (2005) ** Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice Hans Zimmer and Tom Holkenborg (2016) * * batteries not included James Horner (1987) *** 1/2 Battle: Los Angeles Brian Tyler (2011) ** Battleship Steve Jablonsky (2012) * Battlestar Galactica Richard Gibbs (2004) ** Battlestar Galactica: Season One Bear McCreary (2005) ** 1/2 Battlestar Galactica: Season Two Bear McCreary (2006) ** 1/2 Bears George Fenton (2014) **** Beat the Drum Klaus Badelt and Ramin Djawadi (2003) **** The Beautiful Country Zbigniew Preisner (2004) **** A Beautiful Mind James Horner (2001) **** Bee Movie Rupert Gregson - Williams (2007) **** Being Julia Mychael Danna (2004) **** Belle Rachel Portman (2014) *** Beloved Infidel Franz Waxman (1959) ** 1/2 Below Graeme Revell (2002) * Ben - Hur Marco Beltrami (2016) ** Beneath the Planet of the Apes Leonard Rosenman (1970) **** Beneath the 12 - Mile Reef Bernard Herrmann (1953) ***** Beowulf Alan Silvestri (2007) *** The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel Thomas Newman (2012) **** The Best of Everything Alfred Newman (1959) *** The Best Offer Ennio Morricone (2013) **** 1/2 The Betsy John Barry (1978) **** A Better Life Alexandre Desplat (2011) **** Between Heaven and Hell and Soldier of Fortune Hugo Friedhofer (1956/5) ***** Beyond Borders James Horner (2003) **** Beyond Rangoon Hans Zimmer (1995) **** 1/2 Beyond the Gates Dario Marianelli (2005) **** Beyond the Poseidon Adventure Jerry Fielding (1979) **** 1/2 The Beyondness of Things John Barry (1998 concept album) ***** The BFG John Williams (2016) *** 1/2 Bhopal: A Prayer for Rain Benjamin Wallfisch (2014) **** The Bible Hans Zimmer and Lorne Balfe (2013) * Bicentennial Man James Horner (1999) **** 1/2 The Big Bounce George S. Clinton (2004) *** The Big Bus David Shire (1976) *** The Big Empty Brian Tyler (2003) ** 1/2 Big Fish Danny Elfman (2003) *** 1/2 The Big Kahuna Christopher Young (1999) *** 1/2 Big Miracle Cliff Eidelman (2012) *** The Big Sleep Jerry Fielding (1978) **** Big Wednesday Basil Poledouris (1978) **** Bilal: A New Breed of Hero Atli Örvarsson (2016) *** Birdman of Alcatraz Elmer Bernstein (1962) ***** Birth Alexandre Desplat (2004) **** The Birth of a Nation Henry Jackman (2016) *** Bite the Bullet Alex North (1975) ***** Black Chris Tilton (2006) **** The Black Bird Jerry Fielding (1975) **** 1/2 The Black Cauldron Elmer Bernstein (1985) *** 1/2 The Black Dahlia Mark Isham (2006) ***** Black Gold James Horner (2011) **** 1/2 Black Hawk Down Hans Zimmer (2001) **** 1/2 The Black Hole John Barry (1979) **** 1/2 Black Panther Ludwig Göransson (2018) **** Black Rain Hans Zimmer (1989) * Black Robe Georges Delerue (1992) **** Black Sails Bear McCreary (2014) **** The Black Stallion Carmine Coppola (1979) and The Black Stallion Returns Georges Delerue (1983) **** Black Sunday John Williams (1977) *** 1/2 The Black Tulip Christopher Young (2010) **** Black Widow Michael Small (1987) *** Blade II Marco Beltrami (2002) *** Blade Runner 2049 Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch (2017) ** Bless the Child Christopher Young (2000) ***** Blizzard Mark McKenzie (2003) **** 1/2 Blood Diamond James Newton Howard (2006) *** 1/2 Blood In, Blood Out Bill Conti (1993) **** Bloodline Ennio Morricone (1979) *** The Blue Lagoon Basil Poledouris (1980) **** The Blue Max Jerry Goldsmith (1966) ***** The Blue Planet George Fenton (2001) ***** Bobby Jones: Stroke of Genius James Horner (2004) *** Body Double Pino Donaggio (1984) **** Body Heat John Barry (1981) ***** The Bodyguard Alan Silvestri (1992) ** Bolt John Powell (2008) *** 1/2 Bonnie & Clyde John Debney (2013) *** 1/2 Book of Blood Guy Farley (2009) *** The Book of Henry Michael Giacchino (2017) *** The Book of Stars Richard Gibbs (1999) *** 1/2 The Book Thief John Williams (2013) **** Born in China Barnaby Taylor (2016) **** Born on the Fourth of July John Williams (1989) ***** The Bounty Hunter George Fenton (2010) *** The Bourne Identity John Powell (2002) *** 1/2 The Bourne Supremacy John Powell (2004) *** 1/2 The Bourne Ultimatum John Powell (2007) **** The Bourne Legacy James Newton Howard (2012) ** The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas James Horner (2008) **** 1/2 The Boys from Brazil Jerry Goldsmith (1978) ***** The Boxtrolls Dario Marianelli (2014) *** 1/2 The Boy Who Could Fly Bruce Broughton (1986) **** Brainstorm James Horner (1983) ***** Brake Brian Tyler (2012) *** Brannigan Dominic Frontiere (1975) **** The Bravados Alfred Newman and Hugo Friedhofer (1958) *** The Brave Little Toaster David Newman (1986) **** 1/2 The Brave One Dario Marianelli (2007) ** 1/2 Breach Mychael Danna (2007) **** Breakheart Pass Jerry Goldsmith (1975) *** 1/2 Breakdown Basil Poledouris (1997) **** Breakout Jerry Goldsmith (1975) *** Breathe Nitin Sawhney (2017) *** The Bride Maurice Jarre (1985) **** The Bridge at Remagen Elmer Bernstein (1969) **** Bridge of Spies Thomas Newman (2015) **** 1/2 Bridget Jones's Baby Craig Armstrong (2016) *** Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia and The Killer Elite Jerry Fielding (1974/5) ***** Broadcast News Bill Conti (1987) *** Broadchurch Ólafur Arnalds (2015) **** 1/2 Broken Arrow Hans Zimmer (1996) * Broken Horses John Debney (2015) *** 1/2 Bruc Xavier Capellas (2010) *** 1/2 Bruce Almighty John Debney (2003) *** The Bucket List Marc Shaiman (2007) *** Buddy Elmer Bernstein (1997) **** Bug Brian Tyler (2006) *** A Bug's Life Randy Newman (1998) **** 1/2 Bugsy Ennio Morricone (1991) *** 1/2 Bullet to the Head Steve Mazzaro (2012) *** Bulletproof Monk Eric Serra (2003) *** The «Burbs Jerry Goldsmith (1989) *** 1/2 Bury my Heart at Wounded Knee George S. Clinton (2007) *** 1/2 The Butterfly Effect Michael Suby (2004) *** 1/2 By Love Possessed Elmer Bernstein (1961) ****

The heater core is heated by engine coolant, so turning the heat and blower motor to max has the same effect as air flowing across the radiator, just on a smaller scale.

This creates a small - scale greenhouse effect, where the air can heat to such levels as to significantly reduce the lifetime of the EPD or even damage it.

* $ 1,500 is the maximum total amount that can be claimed for all products placed in service in 2009 & 2010 for most home improvements, EXCEPT for geothermal heat pumps, solar water heaters, solar panels, fuel cells, and small wind energy systems which are not subject to this cap, and are in effect through 2016

The specific heat of CO2 is only 80 % of air, so that, ironically, the more CO2, the smaller the GE (but as CO2 is only about 0.04 %, this effect is immeasurably small.)

However, the actual claim of IPCC is that the effects of urban heat islands effects are likely small in the gridded temperature products (such as produced by GISS and Climate Research Unit (CRU)-RRB- because of efforts to correct for those biases.

I would suggest these small aerosols have a large effect on the saturated adiabatic cooling and heating cycles and the transport of water vapor latent heat poleward.

you're missing the point — radiative heat transfer is the smallest part of the climate system — it just works better for their pet theory — called the greenhouse effect — that was proven wrong almost a century ago!

But, the pump heating and reservoir cooling effect each panel by the same amount, and have a small net effect compared to the solar heating of the water.

A smaller gradient would slow down the rate at which the oceanic heat sink absorbed the forcing, but that effect would be pretty linear, nothing like the cyclic or step - function data that Trenbeth and others are trying to explain.

John Carter August 8, 2014 at 12:58 am chooses to state his position on the greenhouse effect in the following 134 word sentence: «But given the [1] basics of the greenhouse effect, the fact that with just a very small percentage of greenhouse gas molecules in the air this effect keeps the earth about 55 - 60 degrees warmer than it would otherwise be, and the fact that through easily recognizable if [2] inadvertent growing patterns we have at this point probably at least [3] doubled the total collective amount in heat absorption and re-radiation capacity of long lived atmospheric greenhouse gases (nearly doubling total that of the [4] leading one, carbon dioxide, in the modern era), to [5] levels not collectively seen on earth in several million years — levels that well predated the present ice age and extensive earth surface ice conditions — it goes [6] against basic physics and basic geologic science to not be «predisposed» to the idea that this would ultimately impact climate.»

The trend in greenhouse gas forcing is about 0.045 W / m ^ 2 / year — a small effect adding incrementally to heat in the atmosphere.

The simplest explanation which best matches our observations is that there IS NO such effect (or it is so small as to be non-measurable), and there simply IS N'T any heat to go missing.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Detailed new research into when global warming will start to have a serious effect on local climates has produced the shock finding that it could happen much sooner than scientists have previously predicted London, 9 October — Catastrophic climate change may begin sooner than anyone expected --- and the first place to feel the heat could be a small but important city in Indonesia.

Given the pattern of migration to the suburbs and away from the large cities, small towns and countryside any large grid cell analysis claiming to capture the urban heat effect has to be nonsense.

Just as important, Nelson believes that salt, when ground into small enough particles of the right shape and dispersed randomly, would not block outgoing infrared heat released by Earth, adding to its cooling effect.

Myrrh thinks visible light does not transform into heat in any fashion - it's too small a wavelength and only effects electrons and it provides light and it provide energy for plant life.

The existence of an urban heat island effect in a relatively small settlement as Longyearbyen may come as a surprise.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

In short you have a chaotic system with uncountable numbers of inputs all trying to equalize some small imbalance of forces / effects (temperature, density, humidity, radiant heat loss, radiant heat gain).

It is essentially the result of a balance between (a) the stabilizing effect of upward heat transport in moist and dry convection on both small and large scales and (b), the destabilizing effect of radiative transfer.

Because our excess heat is concentrated in what amounts to point sources, and those point sources are almost invariably located near to the temperature monitoring sites, you may want be a little kinder to Phillip and his opinion that waste heat accounts for a significant amount of our «warming» unless you have convincing evidence that the heat is dissipated so rapidly that its net effect is smaller than our ability to detect.

The role of unforced natural variations is not well known for the early years, but their net effect from 1950 to the present can be concluded to be small based on observed increases in ocean heat content that preclude a major exit of heat from the oceans onto the surface and atmosphere.

This essentially is a moderating effect, and does not seem to be dependent on re-radiation of IR trapping greenhouse gases in anyway, except to the extent that it slows the rate of heat loss at night (which may very well be a real — albiet a small — effect).

However, the preliminary analysis includes only a very small subset (2 %) of randomly chosen data, and does not include any method for correcting for biases such as the urban heat island effect, the time of observation, or other potentially influential biases.»

So far, the initial effect is still relatively small for two reasons: (i) part of that effect has been canceled temporarily by increases in sulfate aerosol, and (ii) the warming has been delayed because it takes a long time for the vast mass of the ocean to heat up.

Possible explanations advanced for the slowdown include the effect of small volcanic eruptions, the absorption of extra heat by the oceanic depths and the juxtaposition of two natural ocean cycles.

Further, air has little heat capacity and the wavelength of re-radiated radiation from CO2 is such that it can not effectively penetrate the oceans (depth of penetration about 10 microns) and at most it simply boils off a small layer of the ocean which probably has a net cooling effect.

There would be some small changes in the radiative heat transfer within the atmosphere, but this would also have a very small effect, because the convection compensates the changes automatically in troposphere.

But the math (according to many more qualified folk than I) doesn't support that; though waste heat can be detectable in some UHI measurements, the effect is too small to have a real impact on any but local scales.

as for carbon dioxide and nitrogen gas and oxygen gas and the collisions you mention — the concentration by volume of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is very small — the most significant effects in the bottom layer of the atmosphere (troposphere) will surely be the heat trapping effect of increased carbon dioxide combined with the pressure - height changes of concentrations of carbon dioxide due to the warming effect.

There are various other small studies examining the effects of microwaves on breast milk, and those examining the effects of using radiation to heat food.

For example, the global average effect of any change in albedo from using solar power would be rather small in comparison to mitigation of climate change if that solar power is used (to displace fossil fuels) for a sufficient time period (example: if a 10 % efficient PV panel with zero albedo (reflectivity for solar (SW) radiation) covered ground with an albedo of 25 — 30 %, the ratio of total increased heating to electricity generation would be similar to that of many fuel - combusting or fission - powered power plants (setting aside inverter and grid efficiency, etc., but still it would be similar).

Altering the heat transfer between the earth» surface and atmosphere = > Only a small effect on surface temperatures.

An increasing number believe that any warming is so small it is indistinguishable from the noise in the environmenal data sets, and that the data have not been properly adjusted for such things as urban heat island effects (are the city temps warmer than the suburbs where you live?

By contrast, the inclusion in the Historical simulation forcing values of Snow Albedo BC forcing does not cause a bias since its effects on GMST and heat uptake are reflected in the Historical simulations; likewise for the trivially small (< 0.0025 W / m2) orbital forcing.

The contention is that the urban heat island effect is too small to be a problem, but it can easily be shown that rural sites do not show the warming shown by the urban sites, a significant different is involved.

The heating radiative effect at atmospheric temperatures is so small as to be negligible for most practical purposes.