In recent years
some small radical groups have exploited the deaths of American servicemen and used their funerals as a backdrop to spew messages of hatred and anti-americanism.
Not exact matches
By respecting the feelings of that
small group of
radicals, we have just disregarded the anguish that so many families felt, both from the terror attack on September 11, 2001 and from the loss of countless brothers, sisters, fathers, mothers, daughters, aunts, uncles, and sons in the war that followed.
Risking goverment shut down for three items that don't even affect the budget for a
small miniorty
radicals in a religion and the insane tea party knowing full well shut down will cause thousands of jobs lost and the end of aid for those who need it is completely ridiculous, why don't they care for the majority that voted them in and not a
small insignificant
group?
At the conclusion of his book, he challenges his readers to a one - year experiment of
radical living where they pray more, read the Bible more, give more, serve more, and attend church (or
small groups) more.
At their best, individual churches can encourage the kind of
small groups that can give us some of the benefits of the «
radical response» discussed in Chapter 17 without the accompanying drawbacks.
After living a short time in Mississiippi, the reaction from a
small radical conservative
group in this Mississippi church is no surprise.
And the only Circus show here is how a
small group of
radical muslims so easily hijacked an entire religion and the so - called «moderates» or «peaceful muslims» as you called them couldn't do sh!t about it.
I suppose this is a step in the right direction, but I think that in general, the idea of «
small groups» as a program or ministry of the church (whether it is of first or secondary importance) falls far short of the the
radical change that is needed to truly be the church in the world.
The
radical theologians — Hamilton, Altizer, Paul van Buren and, from another angle, Richard Rubenstein — were a
small but energetic
group.
As a result of jealousies inspired by a TV story about Chassidic Jews living in a
small midwest town with a meat packing facility, that was bringing jobs and money to the local businesses, all manner of
radical groups, from PETA, to unionizers, to left - wing Jewish newspapers, and detestable bloggers descended like a ton of bricks.
In such a society one could see a certain role for oriental religious
groups and the human potential movement — perhaps even for a
small radical political fringe.
It is a call to
radical change because it entails transcending our narrow selfishness and loyalties to
smaller groups that we have tended to absolutize.
Or a
small group of
radicals developing a highly contagious strain of H5N1 influenza that could be spread by human contact.
A second possibility, according to a much
smaller group of supporters, is via a methyl
radical.
Declaring that «
small improvements are no longer acceptable,» a
group of corporate executives in California is calling for a
radical restructuring of the state's schools, including reducing the required period of formal schooling by four years.
A
small vocal and
radical few determine policy for the larger
group who are either ignorant of their actions, apathetic about politics, or they are intimidated by the more vociferous members.
One of the most
radical abstract artists of the last 50 years is scarcely a household name, or even well known outside a
small group of collectors, connoisseurs, and art historians.
Richard Haden proposes to articulate the exhibition through TAZ and the ways in which it has to do with recreating an «intentional community» (IC) which relates to how past communities purposefully organized in various forms as collectives, to succeed as
small villages or townships, guilds,
radical groups, et cetera, that eventually gave way to controlling socio - economic structures, which eventually led to the loss of authentic empowerment.
Today, in the «War on Terror,» at least one politician can make surprisingly strong statements about plans for negative treatment against large
groups of people (e.g. Muslims) because of concerns that a
small minority of them might be
radical enough to kill a bunch of people, and [the politician can] remain surprisingly popular.