The establishment of new smaller land councils, each with
smaller capital base, compounds the potential that the Indigenous voice will be diminished.
The interesting thing is that by purchasing a smaller house and aggressively paying off the mortgage, it gave them the financial freedom to use
a smaller capital base and other passive streams of income to technically have made work optional.
Your much
smaller capital base is a distinct advantage vis - à - vis large investors such as Buffett or Watsa who need to deploy billions of dollars.
The smaller your capital base, the fewer investments you should have.
It didn't occur to me that with
a small capital base, any yield is basically pretty meaningless.
The question is how big the problems are at Ambac relative to
their small capital base.
But with
a small capital base, how does Jackson make the campaign worth his while?
To be sure the company is perhaps more suited for personal investment than a professionally managed fund, but to those with
a small capital base it provides the opportunity to invest in a very good business at a very good price.
Not exact matches
• Blacksmith Applications, which is backed by Strattam
Capital, acquired GoSimple, an Oldsmar, Fla. -
based provider of food service trade promotion management solutions to
small and mid-tier CPG manufacturing organizations.
Rather than charging 2 % of the fund's total
capital commitment, Sequoia has told investors the management fee will be 1 %
based only on the
smaller stages of «called
capital» drawn from the investors, one of the people said.
North American Merchant Advance Association Not - for - profit trade association representing organizations in the U.S. and Canada that provide working
capital advance products
based on credit, debit or other card and electronic payment - related revenue streams to
small and mid-sized businesses.
In 2012, New York -
based PE firm KPS
Capital Partners made nine times its money by combining
small brands including Labatt USA, Magic Hat and Pyramid into a single entity and selling the combined company for $ 388 million.
It's just a shorter - term, more flexible lease, and a
smaller - format store,» Brendan Wallace, co-founder of Fifth Wall, a California -
based venture
capital firm focused on real estate technologies, told CNBC.
Endurance Lending Network is a web -
based lending platform that connects
small businesses looking for up to $ 500,000 of debt
capital with nontraditional lending sources (accredited individuals, family offices, wealth management platforms, debt funds, etc.).
Both oilsands royalties and corporate income taxes are paid on a net revenue
basis (yes, oilsands royalties are initially paid on gross revenue, but at a lower rate which applies until cumulative net revenue has provided a
small return on initial
capital, so it's basically the same thing).
«Under CAPLines,» notes the SBA, «there are five distinct short - term working
capital loans: the Seasonal, Contract, Builder's, Standard Asset -
Based, and
Small Asset -
Based lines.
There have been some
small successes, like $ 25 million in commitments to Maiden Lane, a quasi-independent fund that primarily backs companies via AngelList's syndicates program, which allows well - known individual investors to create pools of committed
capital that gets invested on a deal - by - deal
basis.
That's according to the results of a
small - business trends study released today by OnDeck
Capital, a New York -
based small - business lending company that uses software to streamline the loan application process.
We look at venture
capital investments by state, as well as
small - business lending on a relative
basis.
New York City -
based OnDeck
Capital launched a new loan program today that gives
small - business owners access to a significant amount of cash in a flash.
At the helm of the San Diego -
based community development corporation,
Small Business Finance, Kurt Chilcott works to help small - business owners get access to capital, especially through government - backed loan prog
Small Business Finance, Kurt Chilcott works to help
small - business owners get access to capital, especially through government - backed loan prog
small - business owners get access to
capital, especially through government - backed loan programs.
(New York, NY) March 24, 2010 — On Deck
Capital (www.ondeck.com), a leading provider of
small business financing solutions, announced today announced today that over $ 50 million of loans have now been made to more than 2,000 Main Street
small businesses using its proprietary performance lending system which evaluates businesses
based on electronic performance data rather than relying solely on the business owner's personal credit score.
We're strong believers,
based on our own experiences with our
small - business clients, in the power of working
capital to enable business owners to grow and expand their businesses in ways they couldn't otherwise.
The vagaries of a banking system with many
smaller participants relying heavily on a market -
based system of funding could be mitigated by an evolution to fewer nationwide banks backed by FDIC charters - and therefore not be as affected by the whims and fluctuations of
capital markets.
Branching out to all your networks of family and friends can help with financing your business by collecting
smaller amounts of
capital from a greater
base of people.
In what is considered a first step for even bigger foreign direct investment to Sri Lanka, TPG
Capital announced in August it would invest $ 113 million to buy a majority stake in Union Bank, a
small distressed financial institution
based in Colombo.
Dave Lambert, who for the last eight years has run Right Side
Capital Management LLC, a
small San Francisco -
based fund, uses a largely automated system to review thousands of companies annually.
To alleviate the slowdown and offset the liquidity drain due to continuing
capital outflows the People's Bank of China, the central bank, undertook further easing measures, cutting the reserve requirement ratio by a further 50
basis points to 17 % and 15 % for large and
small banks respectively at the beginning of March.
It's clear, however, that we are entering a new and exciting age for startups and
small businesses where more great companies will have access to
capital from a much larger
base of accredited investors.
John also served as the VP and Head of Corporate Development for an early - stage renewable energy and feed company
based in Florida as well as a Director in Business Development at Valens
Capital, a billion dollar hedge fund focused on providing flexible, custom - tailored and cost - effective debt and equity growth financing solutions to
small - cap public and private companies.
PagSeguro Digital Ltd (NYSE: PAGS), a Brazil -
based mobile payment provider that focuses mostly on micro-merchants,
small - and medium - sized companies, faces a «compelling» opportunity in its home market, according to KeyBanc
Capital Markets.
And whether it be equity, debt or royalty -
based structures — from main street
small businesses, to tech startups, to film producers and artists — it's fundamentally improving how businesses and individuals raise
capital.
In addition, we work directly with large corporations, middle market companies,
small businesses, municipal governments and many types of institutional entities to provide solutions -
based financing alternatives for the acquisition of
capital equipment and software.
One
small example of this in our neighborhood is the urban farm one of my friends and mentors started to provide jobs to «returning citizens»: It required the city to help give away land and clear vacant property and some startup
capital from a local farming company, but it is
based on the church's understanding of the needs of the people and explicitly tied to the concept that faithful believers can help disciple and encourage people who have been incarcerated for harming others, walking them through the transformative process.
The real content of the programme of these gentlemen (and some ladies) is undeniable because at its
base it guarantees maximum profit for
capital, at the price of stagnation and growing inequality between the
small minorities benefiting from the system and all the working classes, and between the nations of the triad and all the rest.
We identified three interrelated points of tension being intensified by supermarket chains: whether progress is encapsulated by being an agricultural production or a modern consumption centre; whether progress should be
based on a model of corporate
capital or the local
small business; and to what extent modern citizens can and should support community shopping instead of convenience shopping.
Table 1: Selection, Design & Construction of HSV -
based Oncolytic Viruses Table 2: Selection, Design & Construction of Adenovirus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 3: Selection, Design & Construction of Vaccinia Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 4: Selection, Design & Construction of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 5: Selection, Design & Construction of Newcastle Disease Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 6: Selection, Design & Construction of Various Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 7: Current Company - Sponsored Clinical Trials of T - Vec Table 8: Clinical Trials of ColoAd1 Table 9: Clinical Trials with JX - 594 Table 10: Clinical Trials with GL - ONC1 Table 11: Clinical Trials of CAVATAK (CVA21) Table 12: Clinical Trials with MV - NIS Table 13: Overview of Oncolytic Viruses by Development Phase & Virus Family Table 14: Profile of Approved and Marketed Oncolytic Viruses Table 15: Pivotal Study Design of Oncolytic Viruses in Late Stage Development Based on Previous Clinical Results Table 16: Approved Indications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Table 17: Active Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 18: Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 19: Active or Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Other Anti-Cancer Therapeutics Table 20: Pattern of Transgenes in Oncolytic Viruses in Relation to Development Phase Tables 21a and 21b: Indications and Frquency and Way of Administration of Oncolytic Viruses in Active and / or Positive Completed Clinical Studies Table 22: Small and Medium Pharma & Biotech as Partner for Regional Co-Development of Oncolytic Viruses Table 23: Immuno - Oncology Portfolio of Major Pharma & Biotech with Interest in Oncolytic Viruses Table 24: Interests of Major Pharma & Biotech in Oncolytic Viruses Table 25: First Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 26: Second Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 27: Third Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 28: Fourth Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 29: Grants, Credits & Donations Table 30: Financing by Venture Capital, Private Equity and Other Private Placements Table 31: Collaboration & Licensing Agreements Table 32: Companies Listed on Stock Exchange & Offerings Table 33: Mergers & Acquisi
based Oncolytic Viruses Table 2: Selection, Design & Construction of Adenovirus -
based Oncolytic Viruses Table 3: Selection, Design & Construction of Vaccinia Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 4: Selection, Design & Construction of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 5: Selection, Design & Construction of Newcastle Disease Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 6: Selection, Design & Construction of Various Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 7: Current Company - Sponsored Clinical Trials of T - Vec Table 8: Clinical Trials of ColoAd1 Table 9: Clinical Trials with JX - 594 Table 10: Clinical Trials with GL - ONC1 Table 11: Clinical Trials of CAVATAK (CVA21) Table 12: Clinical Trials with MV - NIS Table 13: Overview of Oncolytic Viruses by Development Phase & Virus Family Table 14: Profile of Approved and Marketed Oncolytic Viruses Table 15: Pivotal Study Design of Oncolytic Viruses in Late Stage Development Based on Previous Clinical Results Table 16: Approved Indications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Table 17: Active Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 18: Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 19: Active or Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Other Anti-Cancer Therapeutics Table 20: Pattern of Transgenes in Oncolytic Viruses in Relation to Development Phase Tables 21a and 21b: Indications and Frquency and Way of Administration of Oncolytic Viruses in Active and / or Positive Completed Clinical Studies Table 22: Small and Medium Pharma & Biotech as Partner for Regional Co-Development of Oncolytic Viruses Table 23: Immuno - Oncology Portfolio of Major Pharma & Biotech with Interest in Oncolytic Viruses Table 24: Interests of Major Pharma & Biotech in Oncolytic Viruses Table 25: First Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 26: Second Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 27: Third Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 28: Fourth Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 29: Grants, Credits & Donations Table 30: Financing by Venture Capital, Private Equity and Other Private Placements Table 31: Collaboration & Licensing Agreements Table 32: Companies Listed on Stock Exchange & Offerings Table 33: Mergers & Acquisi
based Oncolytic Viruses Table 3: Selection, Design & Construction of Vaccinia Virus -
based Oncolytic Viruses Table 4: Selection, Design & Construction of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 5: Selection, Design & Construction of Newcastle Disease Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 6: Selection, Design & Construction of Various Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 7: Current Company - Sponsored Clinical Trials of T - Vec Table 8: Clinical Trials of ColoAd1 Table 9: Clinical Trials with JX - 594 Table 10: Clinical Trials with GL - ONC1 Table 11: Clinical Trials of CAVATAK (CVA21) Table 12: Clinical Trials with MV - NIS Table 13: Overview of Oncolytic Viruses by Development Phase & Virus Family Table 14: Profile of Approved and Marketed Oncolytic Viruses Table 15: Pivotal Study Design of Oncolytic Viruses in Late Stage Development Based on Previous Clinical Results Table 16: Approved Indications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Table 17: Active Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 18: Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 19: Active or Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Other Anti-Cancer Therapeutics Table 20: Pattern of Transgenes in Oncolytic Viruses in Relation to Development Phase Tables 21a and 21b: Indications and Frquency and Way of Administration of Oncolytic Viruses in Active and / or Positive Completed Clinical Studies Table 22: Small and Medium Pharma & Biotech as Partner for Regional Co-Development of Oncolytic Viruses Table 23: Immuno - Oncology Portfolio of Major Pharma & Biotech with Interest in Oncolytic Viruses Table 24: Interests of Major Pharma & Biotech in Oncolytic Viruses Table 25: First Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 26: Second Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 27: Third Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 28: Fourth Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 29: Grants, Credits & Donations Table 30: Financing by Venture Capital, Private Equity and Other Private Placements Table 31: Collaboration & Licensing Agreements Table 32: Companies Listed on Stock Exchange & Offerings Table 33: Mergers & Acquisi
based Oncolytic Viruses Table 4: Selection, Design & Construction of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus -
based Oncolytic Viruses Table 5: Selection, Design & Construction of Newcastle Disease Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 6: Selection, Design & Construction of Various Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 7: Current Company - Sponsored Clinical Trials of T - Vec Table 8: Clinical Trials of ColoAd1 Table 9: Clinical Trials with JX - 594 Table 10: Clinical Trials with GL - ONC1 Table 11: Clinical Trials of CAVATAK (CVA21) Table 12: Clinical Trials with MV - NIS Table 13: Overview of Oncolytic Viruses by Development Phase & Virus Family Table 14: Profile of Approved and Marketed Oncolytic Viruses Table 15: Pivotal Study Design of Oncolytic Viruses in Late Stage Development Based on Previous Clinical Results Table 16: Approved Indications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Table 17: Active Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 18: Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 19: Active or Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Other Anti-Cancer Therapeutics Table 20: Pattern of Transgenes in Oncolytic Viruses in Relation to Development Phase Tables 21a and 21b: Indications and Frquency and Way of Administration of Oncolytic Viruses in Active and / or Positive Completed Clinical Studies Table 22: Small and Medium Pharma & Biotech as Partner for Regional Co-Development of Oncolytic Viruses Table 23: Immuno - Oncology Portfolio of Major Pharma & Biotech with Interest in Oncolytic Viruses Table 24: Interests of Major Pharma & Biotech in Oncolytic Viruses Table 25: First Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 26: Second Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 27: Third Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 28: Fourth Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 29: Grants, Credits & Donations Table 30: Financing by Venture Capital, Private Equity and Other Private Placements Table 31: Collaboration & Licensing Agreements Table 32: Companies Listed on Stock Exchange & Offerings Table 33: Mergers & Acquisi
based Oncolytic Viruses Table 5: Selection, Design & Construction of Newcastle Disease Virus -
based Oncolytic Viruses Table 6: Selection, Design & Construction of Various Virus - based Oncolytic Viruses Table 7: Current Company - Sponsored Clinical Trials of T - Vec Table 8: Clinical Trials of ColoAd1 Table 9: Clinical Trials with JX - 594 Table 10: Clinical Trials with GL - ONC1 Table 11: Clinical Trials of CAVATAK (CVA21) Table 12: Clinical Trials with MV - NIS Table 13: Overview of Oncolytic Viruses by Development Phase & Virus Family Table 14: Profile of Approved and Marketed Oncolytic Viruses Table 15: Pivotal Study Design of Oncolytic Viruses in Late Stage Development Based on Previous Clinical Results Table 16: Approved Indications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Table 17: Active Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 18: Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 19: Active or Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Other Anti-Cancer Therapeutics Table 20: Pattern of Transgenes in Oncolytic Viruses in Relation to Development Phase Tables 21a and 21b: Indications and Frquency and Way of Administration of Oncolytic Viruses in Active and / or Positive Completed Clinical Studies Table 22: Small and Medium Pharma & Biotech as Partner for Regional Co-Development of Oncolytic Viruses Table 23: Immuno - Oncology Portfolio of Major Pharma & Biotech with Interest in Oncolytic Viruses Table 24: Interests of Major Pharma & Biotech in Oncolytic Viruses Table 25: First Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 26: Second Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 27: Third Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 28: Fourth Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 29: Grants, Credits & Donations Table 30: Financing by Venture Capital, Private Equity and Other Private Placements Table 31: Collaboration & Licensing Agreements Table 32: Companies Listed on Stock Exchange & Offerings Table 33: Mergers & Acquisi
based Oncolytic Viruses Table 6: Selection, Design & Construction of Various Virus -
based Oncolytic Viruses Table 7: Current Company - Sponsored Clinical Trials of T - Vec Table 8: Clinical Trials of ColoAd1 Table 9: Clinical Trials with JX - 594 Table 10: Clinical Trials with GL - ONC1 Table 11: Clinical Trials of CAVATAK (CVA21) Table 12: Clinical Trials with MV - NIS Table 13: Overview of Oncolytic Viruses by Development Phase & Virus Family Table 14: Profile of Approved and Marketed Oncolytic Viruses Table 15: Pivotal Study Design of Oncolytic Viruses in Late Stage Development Based on Previous Clinical Results Table 16: Approved Indications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Table 17: Active Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 18: Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 19: Active or Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Other Anti-Cancer Therapeutics Table 20: Pattern of Transgenes in Oncolytic Viruses in Relation to Development Phase Tables 21a and 21b: Indications and Frquency and Way of Administration of Oncolytic Viruses in Active and / or Positive Completed Clinical Studies Table 22: Small and Medium Pharma & Biotech as Partner for Regional Co-Development of Oncolytic Viruses Table 23: Immuno - Oncology Portfolio of Major Pharma & Biotech with Interest in Oncolytic Viruses Table 24: Interests of Major Pharma & Biotech in Oncolytic Viruses Table 25: First Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 26: Second Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 27: Third Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 28: Fourth Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 29: Grants, Credits & Donations Table 30: Financing by Venture Capital, Private Equity and Other Private Placements Table 31: Collaboration & Licensing Agreements Table 32: Companies Listed on Stock Exchange & Offerings Table 33: Mergers & Acquisi
based Oncolytic Viruses Table 7: Current Company - Sponsored Clinical Trials of T - Vec Table 8: Clinical Trials of ColoAd1 Table 9: Clinical Trials with JX - 594 Table 10: Clinical Trials with GL - ONC1 Table 11: Clinical Trials of CAVATAK (CVA21) Table 12: Clinical Trials with MV - NIS Table 13: Overview of Oncolytic Viruses by Development Phase & Virus Family Table 14: Profile of Approved and Marketed Oncolytic Viruses Table 15: Pivotal Study Design of Oncolytic Viruses in Late Stage Development
Based on Previous Clinical Results Table 16: Approved Indications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Table 17: Active Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 18: Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 19: Active or Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Other Anti-Cancer Therapeutics Table 20: Pattern of Transgenes in Oncolytic Viruses in Relation to Development Phase Tables 21a and 21b: Indications and Frquency and Way of Administration of Oncolytic Viruses in Active and / or Positive Completed Clinical Studies Table 22: Small and Medium Pharma & Biotech as Partner for Regional Co-Development of Oncolytic Viruses Table 23: Immuno - Oncology Portfolio of Major Pharma & Biotech with Interest in Oncolytic Viruses Table 24: Interests of Major Pharma & Biotech in Oncolytic Viruses Table 25: First Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 26: Second Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 27: Third Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 28: Fourth Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 29: Grants, Credits & Donations Table 30: Financing by Venture Capital, Private Equity and Other Private Placements Table 31: Collaboration & Licensing Agreements Table 32: Companies Listed on Stock Exchange & Offerings Table 33: Mergers & Acquisi
Based on Previous Clinical Results Table 16: Approved Indications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Table 17: Active Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 18: Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) Table 19: Active or Planned Clinical Studies of Oncolytic Viruses in Combination with Other Anti-Cancer Therapeutics Table 20: Pattern of Transgenes in Oncolytic Viruses in Relation to Development Phase Tables 21a and 21b: Indications and Frquency and Way of Administration of Oncolytic Viruses in Active and / or Positive Completed Clinical Studies Table 22:
Small and Medium Pharma & Biotech as Partner for Regional Co-Development of Oncolytic Viruses Table 23: Immuno - Oncology Portfolio of Major Pharma & Biotech with Interest in Oncolytic Viruses Table 24: Interests of Major Pharma & Biotech in Oncolytic Viruses Table 25: First Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 26: Second Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 27: Third Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 28: Fourth Generation Oncology Virus Companies and their Sources of Technology Table 29: Grants, Credits & Donations Table 30: Financing by Venture
Capital, Private Equity and Other Private Placements Table 31: Collaboration & Licensing Agreements Table 32: Companies Listed on Stock Exchange & Offerings Table 33: Mergers & Acquisitions
Source
Capital is
based in San Diego, but we provide lending services across California in large and
small cities alike.
NVR has a different business model than Lennar as it uses less
capital (it employs a
smaller asset
base).
The high degree of balance sheet leverage for certain bond insurers means that
small changes in the values of these portfolios have a large impact on the bond insurers»
capital base.
The Portfolio seeks long - term
capital appreciation through investments in equity securities of
small companies
based outside the United States.
While
Small & Mid-cap stocks gives one an opportunity to go beyond the usual large blue chip stocks and present possible higher
capital appreciation, it is important to note that
Small & Mid-cap stocks can be riskier and more volatile on a relative
basis.
Of course there are businesses that can justify premium - to - market valuations on the
basis of their ability to incrementally deploy
capital at high rates of return, but that subset of businesses is very, very
small.
After all, it's a
capital light industry that is highly scalable; relatively
small fixed overhead costs can be amortized over vast asset
bases, resulting in some very fat margins and returns on shareholder
capital as an asset manager's business expands.
Michael recently joined Geosam
Capital Inc., a Toronto -
based private equity firm that focuses on
small - capitalization activist investments and distressed debt investments.
Only a
small subset of the advisors are independent and would be paid
based on
capital under management.
Attended a student Q&A with Buffett earlier this year and he specifically mentioned a basket of net net bargains in India that he would invest in if his
capital base was
smaller
Andrew Shapiro is founder, president and portfolio manager of Lawndale
Capital Management, an RIA
based in Mill Valley, Calif., that manages activist hedge funds focused on
small and micro-cap companies.
Small business credit cards help your small business get access to capital that you can use on an ongoing b
Small business credit cards help your
small business get access to capital that you can use on an ongoing b
small business get access to
capital that you can use on an ongoing
basis.
I personally know of numerous managers with 10 - year track records or more that manage their own
capital alongside a
small base of client
capital in private partnerships where the results have ranged from 20 - 35 % annually in a time where the S&P has gone really nowhere.