(I'm thinking of supply side economics and the obvious need for a larger rather than
smaller gas tax to help us get moving away from it; in England in April it was about $ 9 per gallon, though I'm sure it's more than that now.)
Not exact matches
NDP commitments include a two point cut in the
small business
tax rate (already implemented by the Conservatives); extension of the accelerated capital cost allowance for two years (already implemented by the Conservatives (but with a different phase in); an innovation
tax credit for machinery used in research and development; an additional one cent of
gas tax for the provinces for infrastructure; a transit infrastructure fund; increased funding for social housing; a major child care initiative; and, increasing ODA funding to 0.7 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI).
NDP promises include a two point cut in the
small business
tax rate (already implemented in the budget by the Conservatives); extension of the accelerated capital cost allowance for two years (also already implemented by the Conservatives); an innovation
tax credit for machinery used in research and development; an additional one cent of
gas tax for the provinces for infrastructure; a transit infrastructure fund; increased funding for social housing; a major child care initiative; increasing ODA funding to 0.7 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI); and restoring the 6 % annual escalator to the Canada Health Transfer.
«While Senator Gillibrand fights every single day to protect New York taxpayers — from opposing the flawed Wall Street bailout to delivering middle class
tax cuts that save our families money and help
small businesses create jobs — our opponents want to keep driving a million miles an hour with their hands off the wheel and their foot on the
gas.»
A Japanese
tax break on
small,
gas - sipping cars has also helped the ASX.
Those outgoing M cars have their drawbacks (the M3 might be the
smallest car ever hit with the
gas - guzzler
tax), but in its dotage I'm finding that I harbor a soft spot for the normally aspirated engine.
In practice, the Regional Greenhouse
Gas Initiative (RGGI) operates more like a straight up carbon
tax than a cap and trade — and a
small one at that.
Republicans strongly dislike the Obama Administration's EPA greenhouse
gas regulations; they could easily replace this big government solution with a
small government, free market, economically beneficial revenue - neutral carbon
tax.
Interestingly, beyond this, despite considerable rhetoric about moving beyond debates about carbon - pricing, the report recommends that in order to avoid adding to the Federal debt, it would be necessary to impose new
taxes, including increased royalties for oil and
gas extraction, a
tax on imported oil, a
tax on electricity sales, and a «very
small carbon price» (presumably from a modest carbon
tax or unambitious cap - and - trade system).
Seems like a
small price to pay for significant economic development (lease payments to landowners, increased
tax revenue for host communities, service jobs, manufacturing jobs, etc) and a cleaner environment (the alternative is coal, natural
gas and nuclear).
This is because many Americans still drive oversized
gas - guzzling vehicles, and therefore have a lot more ability to reduce their fuel consumption by greater efficiency (or
smaller vehicles), while Europeans already drive
smaller and more efficient vehicles (due to heavy motor fuel
taxes), so would have extreme difficulty reducing consumption still further in response to the appeals of climate campaigners.
Authored by Tufts University economist Gilbert Metcalf, it finds that repeal of these three
tax preferences would reduce U.S. oil and
gas production by less than 5 %, and global oil demand by about 0.5 % — impacts he considers relatively
small.