I suspect the people of 2100 will be much richer than we are, consume more energy, have
a smaller global population, and enjoy more wilderness than we have today.
The bottom line is
smaller global population is plausible, but not until after 2100 on any realistic assumption, so wont help with dangerous climate change issues and Paris accord targets of 2050.
Over long term time scales I see
a smaller global population of maybe 3 billions, living in cities but with low rise passive solar design homes and offices.
Its caused by population and gdp growth, so we have to promote both lower population and gdp growth, and eventually
smaller global population (hopefully technology based).
If life partnership and parenthood were allocated based on the basis of deservedness, there would be a far
smaller global population, and a whole lot more single people..
I think your numbers of just 10 million in America (and presumably a very
small global population) appear too small, and you haven't really explained why you arrive at that number.
Zebra @ 219, your article is interesting, and I think you are right
small global population living in cities with high technology makes sense.
Not exact matches
This group actually holds a majority of the power over robo advisors because the majority of
global AUM is in the hands of this
small share of the
population.
Bitcoin is a
global game changer however only a
small percentage of the world's
population use it — the early adopters.
He focuses on serving the
global population of
small businesses and self - employed businesses of one.
In a larger country with a
smaller population, Canadian evangelicals are more likely to support sharing resources and welcoming immigrants and refugees; they are less likely to feel a sense of «manifest destiny» or to see their country as a Christian nation, according to Brian Stiller, the Ontario - based
global ambassador of the World Evangelical Alliance.
The
Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 predicted that sugar sweetened drink consumption contributes a relatively
small amount to UK
population morbidity (28000 disability adjusted life years) compared with low fruit and vegetable consumption (1130000 disability adjusted life years).59 Using revenue from a sugar sweetened drink tax to reduce the prices of fruit and vegetables is a potential mechanism for further improving
population health.60
This group of
small countries constitute roughly five percent of the
global population.The member - states share the same challenges in terms of scarce resources, vulnerability to natural disasters, dependency on international trade, and
small but growing
populations in narrow and sometimes submerging portions of land.
The Australian
small carpenter bee
populations appear to have dramatically flourished in the period of
global warming following the last Ice Age some 18,000 years ago.
Weinstock and his collaborators point to these trials as experimental evidence that fits a
global pattern: immune disorders are much rarer in less developed countries where helminthic infestation is widespread than in industrialized countries where much
smaller populations host helminths.
As the
global population increases and demand for fish protein rises — particularly in developing countries — more fisheries are chasing
smaller fish
populations in hopes of recouping higher prices for their efforts.
About one - third of the
global population is infected with the bacteria that cause TB — Mycobacterium tuberculosis, or Mtb — though only a
small percentage will develop the actual disease.
All things being equal, that's still a pretty
small portion of the
global population.
Because the planetary home we inhabit is finite, the Earth's relatively
small size and make - up present the family of humanity with limitations to the growth of its
population size, its consumption of resources and the expansion of the manmade
global economy.
That's an appalling cost — though
small compared to
global population and a decade's worth of
global economic output.
Its a
Global population on a
smaller world.
I would say the survivors are hardly going to choose a peasant culture, given they would have
global technological infrastructure they could borrow, and such a
small population is not going to cause environmental problems.
That's big in absolute terms, but
small relative to total
global economic output and
population.
-- Clarifying what this
small group of countries can do to help forge a new
global climate agreement in Copenhagen in December, — Working out specific partnerships to propel advances toward «transformational technologies» that could supply abundant energy to a growing human
population without overheating the planet.
1) The obvious thing that
smaller population uses less resources and emits less pollution as a
global average.
Put another way, not seeing that the colossal size of the multi-trillion dollar
global economy is soon to become unsustainable in the relatively
small, bounded world we inhabit is a misperception; not seeing that increasing per - capita consumption of Earth's limited resources by six billion, soon to be nine billion, people can not go on much longer, much less forever, is a mistaken impression; and not seeing that absolute
global human
population numbers, just like the
population numbers of other species, can not increase endlessly, relative to a limited resource base, is a misconception, I suppose.
Now that another five years have passed without any upsurge in
global fertility levels, the prospect of a 15 billion
population by end - century must be vanishingly
small.
In fact a strong negative correlation exists between
population growth and development, as the most developed countries have a
small population growth rate, so that a flattening
global population is consistent with
global development leading to higher fuel consumption per capita.
Which is part of the reason they come out with stupid comments like the end of Himalayan glaciers by 2035, but on second thought, maybe we meant 2350... http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/IPCC-retracts-2035-alarm-on-Himalayan-glacier-melt/articleshow/5482397.cms Releasing this much carbon is not a good thing, but when you look at the larger picture, our increasing carbon in the atmosphere from 0.032 % to 0.039 % is
small beer compared to deforestation and our increasing
global population.
However, there are no compelling data to suggest a confluence of climate - change impacts that would affect
global production in either direction, particularly because relevant fish
population processes take place at regional or
smaller scales for which general circulation models (GCMs) are insufficiently reliable.
Prior to the fossil - fueled Industrial Revolution, the share of the
global population that lived in cities was
small — less than 10 percent.
According to the memo, environmentalists» efforts to combat
global warming would realize the environmentalists» «dream of an egalitarian society based on rejection of economic growth in favor of a
smaller population, eating lower on the food chain, consuming a lot less and sharing a much lower level of resources much more equitably.»
Like Uruguay, the other
global leaders in renewable energy conversion — countries such as Costa Rica, Iceland, and Bhutan — all have
populations smaller than many U.S. states, so it's not entirely fair to compare them with a country of 318 million people.
And of course Australia and California's cuts would have even less effect on
global temperatures, as they have
smaller populations and thus lower total emissions.