They use the system, they are
smarter than poor people.
Not exact matches
[50:40] Don't fall in love with your product or service [51:55] Fall in love with your customers [52:00] Become and owner, not an operator [52:30] Hire
people smarter than you [55:20] Advice for a passion project [55:35] A belief is a
poor substitute for experience [55:50] Give
people an experience [56:00] Branding is identity [56:05] Identity is the strongest driving force we have [57:50] Hunger trumps intelligence any day [58:40] Where does your hunger come from?
The dog, often referred to as a
poor dumb animal, has proven through the years that it is not a dumb animal, but generally
smarter than the
person who owns him.
I don't know, I'm not part of that conspiracy, and I see a lot of assertions on here and elsewhere by
people who imply they are
smart, or at least
smart enough to know more on this issue
than the climate scientists who actually professionally study it, who throw around large highfalutin science terms, but that repeatedly misconstrue the basic climate change issue itself, conflate the process of science with Climate Change refutation, seem to have an extensively
poor understanding of the issue, and take small select bits of data as part of the ongoing total picture of increasing overall corroboration, to falsely equate that with a flaw in Climate Change theory itself, or as a referendum on it.
It's
smart to even have more
than one
person proof read your resume, as small errors are easy to miss but can certainly make a
poor impression.