Not exact matches
Be
smarter, funnier, and looser
than the smug, overwritten movies that tend to populate the «meta -
genre»
genre.
British director Ben Wheatley is too
smart to make nice little
genre films — and his scattershot yet monotonous latest, Free Fire, is worse
than that.
It wasn't a hit when it came out — director John Flynn was better with character
than action and never really gets the blood pumping through it — but it is still a
smart, lean thriller and a minor gem of the modern crime
genre.
Now, that might mean a movie that's marginally less dopey
than most mainstream films that deal with the occult, but in the days of this and Rosemary's Baby, etc., the emphasis was much more on
smart than on
genre.
What has as its foundation a complicated bit of metaphysics is CGI - enhanced,
genre - slotted, and «atmosphered» into stultified incoherence («spooky red light» should get a credit in the cast listing)-- and all the while Carrey, as is his inclination, begins to overcompensate for a project that, we presume, he discovered he was a lot
smarter than too late.
Hollywood pro William Wellman directed more
than 80 films in every
genre over the course of four decades, but for my money, he was never more interesting
than in the early sound era, where his energy and audacity powered over a dozen short, sharp, street -
smart films filled with saucy sexiness and startling violence and mixed with varying measures of social commentary.
Still, this tale of a high school boy whose party to woo the girl of his dreams is ruined by a zombie invasion is
smarter and more fun
than most micro-budget
genre fare.
Do you think it's not
smart to write in more
than one
genre, especially when the
genres are disparate.