Generous daycare subsidies might be
the smartest thing governments can do: Extensive research shows the most effective way to increase the number of women taking part in the economy is to ensure reliable, affordable child care.
Not exact matches
To do this, we don't need the
government — we just need to get our
smart people building
things again.
over whether Bitcoin is more or less important than its underlying tech, Consensus 2016 saw keynote addresses and panel discussions on applications for blockchain or distributed ledger technology in cross-border payments,
smart contracts,
government, security, identity, the Internet of
Things, and all different kinds of clearing and settlement.
Despite a lingering argument over whether Bitcoin is more or less important than its underlying tech, Consensus 2016 saw keynote addresses and panel discussions on applications for blockchain or distributed ledger technology in cross-border payments,
smart contracts,
government, security, identity, the Internet of
Things, and all different kinds of clearing and settlement.
Clarity on commitment to decentralisation, including opportunities for local action in Community Energy,
Smart Cities and the Internet of
Things, which are new developments that hold considerable potential, but developers and entrepreneurs are held back where there is lack of clarity in the
government's intent.
Since then,
things have changed thanks to a huge surge of financial support from foreign
governments and
smart licensing deals by pharmaceutical companies.
I think that Race to the Top was transformative — not just for advancing reform — but for advancing the notion that
smart government can actually accomplish politically difficult
things.
But
government and society did play a role because at the time the accidental
things happened there were
smart people who had been trained and knew what to look for who were able to take advantage of them.
The UK
government was either
smart enough to see the problems in advance with the Euro, or they did the right
thing for the wrong reasons.
But I also can't blame
governments for their reluctance to shovel ever - more cash into a system that never seems to get any better or
smarter or faster or more effective, because judges won't change the way they do
things and court staff won't change the way they do
things and regulators won't change the way they do
things and lawyers won't change the way they do
things.
First, it is a
smarter form of money that doesn't require cost and time in managing it by individuals or
government and banks and be used to buy and sell
things.