Sentences with phrase «smoking gun here»

There is a smoking gun here, with 39 shell casings.

Unfortunately, there's not one smoking gun here we can point to as a cause, and then identify one solution.

Not exact matches

If by some fluke I do find myself heaven - bound on May 21 in a puff of smoke while my ailing mother and father are left down here with no one to care for them as the Horsemen ride over the hill shootin'their 6 - guns, I'm gonna demand a return flight so I can stand guard in front of their house with my NFR - approved lariat, ready for some ropin».

So, when you talk about smoking gun, you know, in the interest of course, that we don't have four hours for a podcast, what, are there other things on here that you think leap out, as far as things that influence high cortisol, or things that you specifically ordered on this custom panel that you really wan na highlight?

In terms of the smoking gun, so if you look at, I'm on page three here, your testosterone at 496 is not bad, but it's, you know, depending on if you look at an optimal reference range for testosterone, it's maybe a little bit on the low side.

«What we are presenting here is smoking - gun evidence that these «rescission documents» have fabrication and forgeries.

EDIT: Here's the smoking gun topic about GTA IV.

On the naïve and scientifically silly assumption that the only way that plant - based carbon can get into the atmosphere is by people burning fuels, they exult that here indeed is the smoking gun: Decreases of C13 in the atmosphere mean that our sinful combustions are clearly identifiable as major contributors to the 100 ppm increase in CO2 since 1850.

There is no smoking gun of socialist propaganda here!

So, what we have here from Bud Ward is little more than half the story, with the basic idea of trusting Gelbspan as some kind of highly regarded investigative journalist who found smoking gun proof that skeptic climate scientists are shills paid by the fossil fuel industry to lie to the public.

Sorry to ramble off track here, but wouldn't it be great if we could sidestep the whole (somewhat politically driven) debate on whether man's c02 contributions is driving global warming (is a smoking gun even possible on either side?)

And Michaels here — click image to enlarge — and, once again, with guess who and guess what «smoking gun evidence» right below him?

The alleged «smoking gun» old paper by Dr S Fred Singer that I linked directly to in part one of this post said as much here....