Sentences with phrase «smoking guns proving»

As a rule, climate scientists have never been mistaken for Shakespearean wordsmiths, and they soon found a few poorly - worded emails turned into smoking guns proving a vast conspiracy to embrace the hoax of manmade climate change.

«I'm sure the majority (but not all) of my IPCC colleagues cringe when I say this, but I see neither the developing catastrophe nor the smoking gun proving that human activity is to blame for most of the warming we see.»

Not exact matches

In 2010 Kellner brandished a «smoking gun» which, he claimed, proved that liquor manufacturer Diageo had improperly worked on behalf of liquor stores trying to preserve their franchise.

The inquiry failed to find a smoking gun which would see Mr Hunt ejected from his job, but the various emails, texts and phone calls proved highly embarrassing to the media secretary, who cut a hesitant and nervous figure for the duration of the session.

While her research did not find a «smoking gun,» definitively proving that the radioactive isotopes were injected by a shock wave, Telus did show that the amount of Fe - 60 present in the early Solar System is consistent with a supernova origin.

This feature is regarded as the smoking gun for proving their existence and is a crucial step towards their use as a building block for future quantum computers.

«There are all these smoking guns to indicate that the microbiota may be involved [in asthma], but there were no experiments to prove it,» says microbiologist Brett Finlay of the University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, in Canada, a senior author on the paper.

And if, García - Bellido says, any black hole in a LIGO merger proves to weigh less than our sun, this would be a «smoking gun» for primordial black holes, as such relatively minuscule black holes are thought impossible to form from stars.

Now, iron - rich particles from steel manufacturing and coal burning, collected in the East China Sea, have been found to have a thick sulphate coating containing soluble iron that provides the «smoking gun'to prove the theory of acid iron dissolution.

There's no smoking gun to prove Jimmy DeMaria is a major crime boss.

Some of us would probably even feel a vengeful twinge of self - righteousness seeing Zuckerberg and his cohorts caught at last with the smoking gun that proves their invention is not only bad for us, but just downright bad.

Some of us would probably even feel a vengeful twinge of self - righteousness seeing Zuckerberg and his cohorts caught at last with the smoking gun that proves their invention is not only bad for us, but just downright

While the security camera footage (at least the portions released to the public via Fox 5 News) didn't prove to be the smoking gun many expected, it was, it seems, sufficiently damning.

He asserts that the corals there are a «smoking gun» proving that a drastic jump in sea levels, of up to 10 feet in 50 years, occurred in a climate warmer than today's.

And finally, the smoking gun, the evidence that proves «whodunit»: energy being trapped in the atmosphere corresponds exactly to the wavelengths of energy captured by CO2.

It is a smoking gun that proves the bankruptcy of current climate science.

This was claimed by Hansen to be the «smoking gun» which «proved» that global warming was happening.

No one is dumb enough to claim that their CFD model is the «smoking gun» that proves that their new airliner wing is better than all the rest, so no testing is required.

In climate science, people come out all the time saying their new you - beaut computer model has provided the «smoking gun» that proves that AGM is real.

«The plaintiffs alleged that the oil companies were in possession of «smoking gun» documents that would prove their liability» Who said it was a «smoking gun»?

The plaintiffs alleged that the oil companies were in possession of «smoking gun» documents that would prove their liability; Mr. Boutrous said this was simply an internal summary of the publicly available 1995 IPCC report.

Despite all the shouting by global warming advocates that CO2, carbon dioxide, is the smoking gun of global warming, there is absolutely no proven evidence that CO2 has effected temperatures and plenty of evidence it has not.

Evidence shows the U.S. government held the smoking gun all along â a fresh examination of an overlooked science report proves Americaâ s brightest and best had shown the White House that the greenhouse gas effect was not real and of no scientific significance since 1979 or earlier.»