Sentences with phrase «so after the death»

There are hundreds of manuscripts dating back to 200 years or so after the death of the last apostle.

much of it 30 years or so after the death of Jesus at least.

He wasn't a skeptic after the fashion of the legal realists who would rise to prominence in the law schools fifty years or so after his death.

After the first of the joint tenants dies, that owner's one - sixth portion will be redistributed evenly amongst the other survivors so after the death, each of the survivors will own one - fifth of the property, jointly with all the other remaining joint tenants.

Another bone of contention many have with the game are the ridiculously long loading times, with it not uncommon to sit staring at a black screen with Bloodborne emblazoned upon it for a good forty seconds or so after each death or transition from one area to another.

Not exact matches

So Viacom's new chairman is not only unloved by some large shareholders, but also unloved by his own vice-chairman, the daughter of the company's controlling shareholder and one of the people who will direct Redstone's assets after his death.

«So, after 15 years, and 14 million dollars and counting, only one death sentence resulted,» Trenticosta wrote in an email.

Because of postwar scarcity, he couldn't buy enough trucks, so he «created his own catering vehicles,» according to an article that ran in the Los Angeles Times after his death in 2002, «with sides that rose to reveal sandwiches and snacks stocked on stainless steel shelves, a prototype for today's mobile catering vans.»

How is it that the Disney name is still so well known nearly 50 years after his death?

If you haven't properly set up access for your heirs, they may need a court order to do so should you become incapacitated or after your death, he said.

Many consumers are already sick and tired of being queried to death after purchases so it» s not clear that they will welcome even more prying if there is no discernible benefit to them.

So, whether you pass away immediately after purchasing coverage or 50 years later, your beneficiaries would receive a death benefit.

So far, a total of 80 deaths have been reported in Texas after Harvey, and there have been at least 42 deaths in Florida as a result of Irma.

If you delay your claim until your full retirement age — which ranges from 66 to 67 depending on when you were born — or even longer, until you are age 70, your monthly benefit will grow and, in turn, so will your surviving spouse's benefit after your death.

In the case that you pass, the policy beneficiaries should file a claim with the insurer, after which point the circumstances of your death will be reviewed and receive the payout (also called a death benefit or the face value of the policy) so long as everything is in order.

Even assuming somehow Anne Frank, after death, could contact these living Mormons who want her to be Mormon Christians, their ideas would be so foreign and seem totally BIZARRE to her.

Concern that relatives have been baptized without their knowledge, and if memory serves the Catholic faith does not consider Mormons a valid religion so if someone is baptized after death how does this affect their Catholic faith.

This Jesus Christ... the son of a mythical god... «was a Jew»... there were no christians until after his death... you religious folk are so ill informed on most of the really inportant topcs... mostly reality.

Just because it would be nice that there was a God, and that this being took care of us through our lives and after our deaths, does not make it so.

Like other atheists has often said: People does not seem so troubled about the billions of years of nonexistence before their birth, but most are very anxious about death and the probable nonexistance after that event.

Losing consciousness, as many people have, is just that, loss of consciousness, So if we can lose consciousness while still alive, how is it possible to retain it after death?

He didn't care for them, he didn't care what happen to their bodies, so why should I care what happens to his body after death?

[24] It can become a present reality for those who are willing to tread the path, and so it is not exclusively an after - death experience.

Somebody has to be a minian under there new mormon god so all of the people converted after death will help occupy that universe under a current mormon walking this planet.

Had pre-Roe abortions been so very dangerous, we would have expected a sharp drop - off in the death rate among women after Roe.

So that's at most 60 years after Jesus» death.

So anyone writing a «made up story about an unknown called Stephen» at this point, they have it all for a story, a prophet of God telling off high priests soon after the Son of God was put to death and rose again.

life after death??? but for me you can not learn all you are suppost to in one life time so we keep coming back to keep learning

So the real questions are: 1) how can there even be a universal understanding of «right» and «wrong» without a creator 2) how can purely random genetic mutations preserved by natural selection have resulted in the desire to do «right» even amongst those that do not believe in life after death?

So you see Keith you are special created for a purpose in this stage of transit test life... as true life is the eternal life that which comes after death on resurrection and Judgment day... God Bless

We believe that we are still «ourselves», so to speak, even when unconscious, and that our «selves» continue after death.

Jesus is the savior of the world, He is the son of God, He lived to set an example of how we should live, He defeated death to overcome sin and hell, so we may be forgiven for our sins and live on after this mortal experience.

All gays (sinners) will be judged after death by god (if they don't repent) and go to hell (if you believe this sort of thing) so death in this life is really no big deal.

«In so far as one wishes to speak of a modification of faith before and after Easter, it can only be said that «once» became «once for all», the isolated encounter with Jesus limited by death became that presence of the exalted Lord such as the Fourth Gospel describes.»

Or perhaps like the poor gullible fool you are, you just accept things on faith knowing that nothing was written about this character until 30 - 40 years after death and knowing that stories told like that so many years after could very well hold little accuracy.

You've got Solomon, called the wisest man alive, and yet he so thoroughly attack the tribes of the north that immediately after his death, they seceded.

Just so you know mate, the gospels were not written until YEARS after Jesus» death.

So your defense of the historicity of Jesus is a claim that you found your information in a university library (with no mention of any specific information), and two people writing about stuff more than 2 generations after the supposed death of Jesus.

Just as Cromwell, after the death of his father - figure, Wolsey, throws in his lot with Anne Boleyn and the king, so Mantel, after her father's disappearance, throws in her lot with her mother and Jack (what choice did she have?)

As he heard the speaker describe the anxiety and resistance of basically affluent people facing death after a comfortable life, he could think only of the many people he knew, like his parents and relatives, who suffer so much so unjustly.

I suppose unless I'm already a believer I will need to pay a believer a nice sum of money in order and take a class in order to understand why a covenant that carries the penalty of death if this god is not worshipped is changed because, help me here (well of course unless god can speak for himself - I guess I have to ask those who have studied his word that he gave only once 2000 years ago to another culture), so after this covenant he came down and became a man in order to give people grace so he doesn't kill them if they don't worship him?

So instead of doing some thinking on your own and questioning the utter absurdity of some writer centuries after the death of Christ offering a «prophecy» that is completely open ended and can not be held accountable or reliable in any way, you just accept that as «truth»?

After all, Yahweh made it clear that he never desires the death of the wicked, but that they would turn to him and live, and so it does not make sense that he would force them to eternally suffer death, since it is for no purpose except perhaps God's satisfaction, which does not seem to fit with his nature.

Humans fear death so they soothe themselves by believing or hoping that there is life after death because the alternative is really scary.

Indeed, only five months after Pius X's death, Benedict said that there is room «for divergent opinions» so long as they constitute no «harm to faith or discipline» and so long as they are expressed «with due moderation.»

People are fundamentally weak and that is where religions has a role... life after death, the devil is why the world has so much adversity.

See that's faith what you just described, because it happened before your time you want more proof for your eyes... He Einstein didn't really have any proof now science is confirming him so maybe after death you get the proof... Live life joyously without regrets you may get no other.

Many Christians talk about death in a way that suggests it isn't actually so bad after all.

It is because sin is so serious and divine judgment is so real that hell (alienation and separation from God by persistent rejection of him) is a reality upon earth and may well be after death.

It's just as likely, after all, to find yourself facing some other god than YHWH upon death, so why obsess about just him?