Sentences with phrase «so are transfer fees»

Not exact matches

So unless your clients are all paying directly through credit, debit or wire transfer, you may be better off springing for a business bank account that does have a monthly fee.

Erick, transfer rates are 1:1, so 50,000 Chase Ultimate Rewards would transfer to 50,000 United MileagePlus miles and there is no fee.

So you can see that even though you pay a $ 45 balance transfer fee with the Citi Double Cash, your monthly, interest - free payment for the limited - time offer is $ 83 compared to $ 100 for the Chase Slate.

The managed funds are proprietary and can not be transferred, so I either have to liquidate them and pay capital gains taxes or live with the higher fees and turnovers.

Unless we are prohibited from doing so by any applicable law, regulation, court order or instruction or guidance of a competent regulatory authority or agency, in terminating your account we may do any of the following at our sole discretion: A. transfer the funds back to the source; or B. convert your account balance to Bitcoins at our then - prevailing rate, subject to applicable fees and as soon as practicable give you 48 hours» notice that we intend to deactivate your account, requesting that you provide us with an alternative bitcoin wallet address to which we can transfer your bitcoin within that period (the «Redemption Period»);

And after the first 60 days, the balance transfer fee is $ 5 or 5 % of the amount transferred, whichever is greater, so you'll need to make transfers early.

It's so easy to get excited about a balance transfer deal that you forget to look at the balance transfer fee.

He must have been riled by media criticism of Lukaku's transfer fee so he takes it out on Lacazette.

That is how to deal with some players that think they are larger than life (Sanchez) if Sanchez wants to go and win championships league please Wenger let him go so that we can use his transfer fee to buy Costa.

Another example: Coquelin is clearly great, yet because they heard so former player earn his keep by criticizing him (Thierry Henry sadly lowered himself to that level recently) they «know» he's not a good player and must be replaced (it's even worse because he didn't cost 50 million in transfer fees so that they'd know he was good as it's well - known that the more expensive the fee, the better the player [cough] DiMaria [cough] Falcao [cough]-RRB-.

The Dutchman is seemingly expecting both Lukaku and Ross Barkley to leave Goodison Park, and so he wants the transfer fees raised from their possible sales to be reinvested in the squad to help them continue to bridge the gap with the top six clubs in the Premier League.

With transfer fees continually on the rise and this summer seeing some crazy prices paid for players, such as the signing of rumoured Arsenal transfer target Gonzalo Higuain by Italian champions Juventus and the crazy money set to be shelled out by Manchester United for their former youth star Paul Pogba, is this why Arsenal have made just one big transfer so far?

After two years on loan at Roma, Szczesny must now return to Arsenal, where has still has another two years remaining on his contract, so he would not be allowed to talk to Juventus, or any other club, until a transfer fee is agreed with the Gunners.

Even funnier, if wenger is so wrapped up in crazy transfer fees then why the f @ # k did he get so wrapped up with mbappe earlier in the window?

«He was like the next best thing and came with a big transfer fee like Aubameyang too, so hopefully they can play at times together up front.»

So I do nt think Arsenal are going for Mahrez for that kind of fee even if Mahrez personally calls up Wenger and begs him to do the transfer, I know he wont.

While this was seen as big money at the time as it broke the world transfer record (though several fees have since dwarfed it, pushing it already as low as fifth on the all - time list), United actually saved around # 100m as a result, or so claims Raiola.

«Real Madrid are a club so worried about image that when I interviewed Bale it was requested to me, «don't put in the transfer fee, don't put in the article how much Gareth Bale cost»,» Northcroft began, as relayed by Goal.

Losing him is a blow for Liverpool, and that's made worse by the fact that they won't even get a fee for him if an exit does materialise as his current contract expires at the end of the season and so Juve will be set to snap him up on a free transfer.

So far this summer Ander Herrera, Luke Shaw and Marcos Rojo have all been acquired for a combined fee of # 72m, whilst Angel di Maria completed his switch from Real Madrid on Tuesday for a British transfer record # 59.7 m.

With a preference to play on the right wing, albeit with the versatility to play through the middle or on the opposite flank too, he'll also have plenty of competition for places at Old Trafford, and so question marks could be raised over such a move given the reported transfer fee involved.

By the way, those cash reserves are before they transfer window so because of transfer fees, agent fees and other stuff, expect it to be around 100 million quid.

He's far too expensive, both in terms or a transfer fee and wages, so it's a waste of money.

We may well be, but if ffp does get relaxed (because poor oligarchs can't buy teams and «invest» to turn them into world class outfits or because sky pays the premier league so much that the «others» are disadvantaged) then it will be the «whole package», transfer fees and wages that spiral up.

If Madrid want to sign Aguero they will sign him, so forget about whether they will meet transfer fee or not, they are not Arsenal, and also stop dreaming of Aguero coming to Arsenal.

So we're much stronger at CB with the potential transfer fees a 20mil upgrade.

It is so easy to talk about transfer fees and only seven million pounds difference in valuations.

Although with that being said granted that he is a premier league player we would have to adjust for inflation, so he will definitely command a transfer fee exceeding # 45 Million however from our perspective with us looking to offload a few of our players, who retrospectively are being looked at by Everton Ospina, Walcott, Gibbs, Ox and Campbell it would provide us with the perfect opportunity to launch a bid upwards of # 40 Million and a player exchange I may be getting ahead of myself but f we were to get rid of any of those guys I'd rather it be in a deal to a team, that couldn't provide a threat to our title ambitions whilst it simultaneously being a deal that advantages all parties.

You've done really well I must say.It's a shame people think you are ignorant but don't know they also pass ignorant comments against you.As for Laczette the only thing which can hold back the move now is the transfer fee as he wants to leave.For Lemar, it's been stated that AS Monaco don't want to sell but if Arsenal increase their first bid very significantly they might just give in so I doubt Lemar is coming.For Sanchez it could be that he's staying because it's been proven that he contradicted himself unknowingly in the interview which he granted.

While the 24 - year - old would tick the boxes needed at Old Trafford, given there is no suggestion of a transfer fee, personal terms being agreed or a medical being scheduled, it's questionable as to whether that will all happen so late on in the window to allow Man Utd to seal a move.

So with those two joining Arteta, Wilshere and Rosicky on the sidelines, Wenger clearly wanted to get the Elneny transfer from Basel done as quickly as possible, so the transfer fee of around # 7 million is agreed and the player has already completed his medical with Arsenal, according to an ESPN reporSo with those two joining Arteta, Wilshere and Rosicky on the sidelines, Wenger clearly wanted to get the Elneny transfer from Basel done as quickly as possible, so the transfer fee of around # 7 million is agreed and the player has already completed his medical with Arsenal, according to an ESPN reporso the transfer fee of around # 7 million is agreed and the player has already completed his medical with Arsenal, according to an ESPN report.

On one hand, the home grown quota policy plays a big part in pricing this sort of players high, in another news our fringe players are not likely to command so high transfer fees because of relatively high wage demands.

So if Ospina is sold for a decent fee then our original reported 70m transfer budget would be in full tact.

If it's all up front and above board, well then that is terrible reading, why skimp on our transfer fees whilst we dish out more wages than the so called plastics.

No transfer fee... Okay so he would ask for large wages, I read that he would ask for at least # 250k per week, this would be # 26mil?

So to re-cap, if AFC change the board, get new ownership, change the business model, change the manager (or give him an updated training manual), reduce the ticket prices, don't sell any players who want to leave, only buy or sell players sanctioned by the fans, spend # 65 - 85M this window, stop negotiating on transfer fees but just hand over the money then we will win the PL and UCL on a regular basis and this particular supporter will be happy.

Even though there are so many clubs chasing the youngster's signature, he is likely to still have a small transfer fee because of the Serie A club's well publicised financial troubles.

Arsenal had been negotiating with Basel for the last 8 months for Elneny and his transfer fee is said to be more than the reported fee (# 7 million) the true cost is kept between the two clubs so that Basel don't get held to ransom when they enter the swiss market to buy players.

All of Wenger's disastrous plans when it comes to transfers, both incoming and outgoing, are coming home to roost... why would anyone pay a significant fee for a player that was hardly used, is overpaid and has a spotty injury record; not to mention the fact that Wenger nickels & dimes everyone when it comes to transfers so it only makes sense that other teams would do likewise when dealing with us... the fact is I wouldn't be surprised if Wenger does this so that players won't be moved thereby giving him a ready - made excuse not to spend more money on transfers; there's a reason why the latest headlines regarding Arsenal transfers seem to suggest that we aren't bringing anyone in until some players are sold or moved elsewhere on loan... we know this club knows how to utilize press coverage to further their questionable agendas, it's the very reason why the Sanchez situation has become such a nightmare

Apparently the transfer fee is agreed and Gibbs wants to go so that seems to be that.

You don't get it do you?I'm not even talking about the money.But I agree with you that for the kind of money that will be spent on Mbappe it's a higher gamble.Henry was bought to be a starter and as the main man for Arsenal.He was so young by then and the pressure on him was massive.Looking at the impact he's had in our club if Henry had failed who would imagine what Arsene would have done.To me he's our best player ever.Arsene put a lot of trust in him to be honest but the gamble paid off.However, I think he had a point to prove to world and to Juve hence he succeeded.The same as is with Mbappe with even a higher transfer fee and more expectation.If he's ever signed for that amount he's coming here to be the main man whowill send us into glory.Forget Ozchez for all eyes will be on him.

JUST IN: As I brought to you yesterday and people will testify that I said a # 12.5 fee was close to being agreed for Kieran Gibbs.The deal has now been agreed but personal terms have not been agreed.Personal terms agreement for Gibbs» transfer for this season has always proved a problem so people shouldn't rejoice just yet.

He has not discussed personal terms which he can't do anyway until a transfer fee is agreed with Lyon, so all in all any reports of a done deal are still far from a reality.

this plan will cost us champions league football next season for sure then we'll be paying manu sized transfer fees for players next summer transfer window — so false econoomy!!

So I don't know if you are aware of it or not but, according to various sources in the news Mesut Ozil, is the prime target for Juventus this transfer window... It seems so strange, this is the first time in a while our main players have been subject to transfer rumours and we haven't even deemed them as a credible threat... anyway the fee currently being proposed is around # 31.5 Million pounds which would mean a 11 million loss on our original investmenSo I don't know if you are aware of it or not but, according to various sources in the news Mesut Ozil, is the prime target for Juventus this transfer window... It seems so strange, this is the first time in a while our main players have been subject to transfer rumours and we haven't even deemed them as a credible threat... anyway the fee currently being proposed is around # 31.5 Million pounds which would mean a 11 million loss on our original investmenso strange, this is the first time in a while our main players have been subject to transfer rumours and we haven't even deemed them as a credible threat... anyway the fee currently being proposed is around # 31.5 Million pounds which would mean a 11 million loss on our original investment.

The most expensive British transfer fee ever paid, # 59.7 m man Angel Di Maria has not done enough at Manchester United so far, despite a promising start, and is now not even getting into the team.

# 15 million may seem like a lot for a player of Szczesny's calibre and especially for a goalkeeper, however let's not forget some of the crazy prices that are flying around the transfer market nowadays and so demanding such a fee isn't entirely unrealistic from Arsenal.

Those two or three clubs with ambition to buy Mahrez in England are Man U, Man City and Chelsea so it won't be Arsenal because they are stingy and don't want to pay the transfer fees that are demanded by selling clubs!

Maybe I am wrong and have simply been conditioned to disappointment on the transfer front after following Arsenal for so many years, but I was very worried to read today that Newcastle United have slapped a transfer fee of around # 35 million on their Euro 2016 France international star Moussa Sissoko, according to an Evening Standard report.

However, it's added by the Express that he has a # 25m release clause which would certainly be appealing to interested parties as that would arguably be a snip for an established player of his quality with his goalscoring record at such a high level in today's market given the transfer fees we've seen in recent times, and so it remains to be seen what the future holds for Mertens.