Sentences with phrase «so as a consequence»

I'm sorry I know that the psychiatric hospitals are empty for the simple reason that some weirdos decided the everything is normal, so as a consequence we have all these «cases» outside rasing hell.

In YouGov polls a large chunk of former Liberal Democrats now say they'll vote Labour, so as a consequence of their different Lib Dem scores ICM also end up showing a lower Labour score than most other companies... hence the 1 point Tory lead yesterday.

«And so as a consequence, they don't have experience in lots of the information to go to college — like the study skills and the academic background.

In this case, it was clearly evident that there was no continuity of business, so as a consequence, the employer, Target, was not found to be the successor employer.

(9) A tax deed or notice of vesting, when registered, vests in the person named in the deed or in the City, as the case may be, any interest in or title to adjoining land acquired by adverse possession before the registration of the tax deed or notice of vesting if the person originally acquiring the interest or title by adverse possession did so as a consequence of possession of the land described in the tax deed or notice of vesting.

So as a consequence, you saw generations of poverty and everything that comes from that.»

Not exact matches

As a consequence, parents who are willing to provide a more lucrative future for their children do so at the expense of their own.

But a food seller that looks to the aggregate social consequences of its junk - food sales, and tries to mitigate negative impacts, might be said to be doing so as part of its social licence to operate.

Taking into into consideration how few alternatives are currently available to address this situation, not to mention the consequences of inaction being so dire if left to continue unabated, it's hardly something that anyone can afford to dismiss too lightly, not just here in Australia, but every community the world over, as well.

So while there are «as many as three thousand different factors that can come into play when trying to understand the causes and consequences of obesity... individual experts tend to focus on just one or two of them, with different experts zeroing in on different factors.»

The cost was so low, and the concept so simple, that space exploration is now within grasp of the everyday person, and many other groups around the world are pursuing their own low - cost space programs as a consequence.

Of course, a handful of observers are so self - satisfied with pointing out the challenges since 2009 that I've regularly admitted and already addressed that they confuse the message with the messenger; ignoring objective evidence as a consequence.

That is difficult to say, but my view is that the data we have seen so far most likely reflect a temporary pause in this quarter, following unexpectedly strong growth in the fourth quarter of 2017 — and as a consequence, we will probably continue to see solid consumption growth over the balance of this year.

As Selena points out, your lifetime benefits are a factor of when you claim Social Security and how long you live, so if you anticipate living to your life expectancy, it's rational to front - load your Social Security, so long as you're comfortable with the future consequenceAs Selena points out, your lifetime benefits are a factor of when you claim Social Security and how long you live, so if you anticipate living to your life expectancy, it's rational to front - load your Social Security, so long as you're comfortable with the future consequenceas you're comfortable with the future consequences.

This is not so much a belief or strategy as it is a matter of fact; there are extensive, well - established guidelines from multiple agencies at all levels of government on how to work within the system, and harsh consequences for those who do not comply.

In particular, no major central bank uses policy rules in a prescriptive way, and it is hard to predict the consequences of requiring the FOMC to do so, as some have proposed.

As a consequence of being part of NAFTA, Canada has had to pay investors more than $ 170 million so far in such settlements.

Not many ex-Communists in fact posed this question, because to do so would be to undermine the presupposition that binds Marxism with all modern forms of moral calculation; «the utilitarian attention to consequences rather than to actions themselves is liable to lead to a continuous evaluation of the present only as it leads on to some future.»

As Christ claimed the victory over death by death, so a Christian defeats death and the fear of death with all of its tragic consequences through a mindfulness of death during his life.

But in doing so, we must use our head and our heart by pursuing a comprehensive approach that tackles the causes of the problem as well as the consequences.

As a consequence, marriages are viewed as (short - term) contracts subject to a cost / benefit analysis, children become consumer goods or accessories, family bonds are weakened and our bodies are treated like so many raw materials to be mined and exploited for manufacture and pleasurAs a consequence, marriages are viewed as (short - term) contracts subject to a cost / benefit analysis, children become consumer goods or accessories, family bonds are weakened and our bodies are treated like so many raw materials to be mined and exploited for manufacture and pleasuras (short - term) contracts subject to a cost / benefit analysis, children become consumer goods or accessories, family bonds are weakened and our bodies are treated like so many raw materials to be mined and exploited for manufacture and pleasure.

as with every other argument about christianity, if it really was only a belief it would be of no consequence, but unfortunately so many use their religious beliefs as an excuse to attempt to demand the rest of the population adhere to their beliefs by codifying them into civil law.

They were convinced a god was speaking to them, so as far as they were concerned they'd better act as directed or face a god's consequences.

God did not need to snap his fingers as time is not of consequence in an eternal landscape so this observed natural process works.

Also, if you believe that God created them, you must also concede that he warned Adam & Eve not to make certain choices, but gave them freedom to do so, and that the consequences they were warned of have come to fruition for both them and all their progeny, and that sin hurts more than just the sinner, and so our lives (all of us) become increasingly more complex and painful with each new sin introduced, such that the choice to do right is often painful for us, which is not as it should be, nor as God would have it, but as we have made it.

So you're saying that a preacher giving you the choice with the warning of eternal afterlife consequences is as convincing as the mafia coming to you with a choice warning of bodily harm or immediate harm to your home and family?

I agree that God didn't pursue Adam to smash his face in, never suggested that or alluded to it, but there is no confusion where sin leads and there is no doubt about the consequences off those who love their lives, they will lose it where as those that hate their lives will find it... So to conclude, Jesus and the father are not two different things, they are both the very same in as much as God desires all to be saved and has shown the way to salvation.

Gore immediately deferred to the court's decision — and liberals thereby reaped the consequence of having established the court as the last word on so many major questions.

He's still a believer and a christian, so perhaps his telling the truth is indicative of reality rather than a consequence of his experiment, but I can see why a christian would leap to judgment in such a case as this.

A normal intelligent person would not consider these questions so lightly — in the form of a wager, as if they were of no serious consequence.

Animals in the wild such as gorillas don't typically go on murdering sprees because it wouldn't be in its best interest to do so not because he thinks it's immoral and won't go to heaven but because of the realistic consequences.

So likewise Kierkegaard's dialectical understanding of faith establishes the subjective truth of faith as a consequence of the negation of objectivity, and the passion and inwardness of faith is established only by virtue of the absurdity of its objective meaning or ground.

Moreover, so long as self - righteousness is judged to be a moral state deriving from an isolated and autonomous individual, there lies no way to a comprehension of its ultimate ground and its universal consequences.

And so for Balthasar the Church flows from the seriousness of the Incarnation and Christ's life as a human being.4 The Church, therefore, is a constitutive part of the divine initiative and not a consequence of it.

Just as the book powerfully exposes the myth that acceptance of gay marriage would have no significant social consequences, so too the authors could have made the further argument that, to varying degrees, all sexual unions outside marriage (as traditionally understood) are harmful to society.

Though innocent of all violence attributed to Him, God allowed the violence committed by others to be laid upon His head so that He might take the blame and thereby rescue and deliver mankind from most of the self - destructive consequences of their sin, and reveal Himself to mankind as a loving Father who takes our sin upon Himself for our deliverance from the consequences of sin and for the sake of our relationship with Him.

So we can dare to calculate consequences, to analyze costs and benefits, precisely because we believe that this is what God does as he works with his world, moving it ever closer to the final consummation of his purpose for all things and all people.

Today as i was thinking about Jesus sending the demons into the pigs and i thought God is not punishing but judging and he made a decision.This idea came from your other discussion which i believe is what he does he decides to make a judgement call he is sovereign and it shows his tender heart and mercy that not a single person was afflicted.The pigs unlike men have no soul so have no eternal consequence upon them they live and they die.either way they were going to get killed.We can be assured that Gods judgements are right and just the pork was going to the gentile nations who worshipped other Gods and no doubt would have been offered to idols so there is a consequence when we disobey the Laws of God even even when we do nt know or understand his laws.brentnz

Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.

With three languages — English, German and French — as channels of expression in every session and with traditional misunderstandings and sectarian prejudices, there would be, of necessity, some critical moments, but the chairmen always so wisely steered the conference out of troubled waters that those instances which did occur were of trifling consequence by the side of the spirit of gracious fellowship which pervaded the delegates both in the conference sessions and in the university halls and hotel lobbies.

So if there is no substitute for repentance as a part of the equation from being cleansed, then why is it a surprise that unrepentance can bring you to a consequence of not having the salvation that was given to you?

Since these features of life are not about to change, divorce will remain an intrinsic part of married life, marriage and family are no longer synonymous, and we must aim not so much to prevent divorce as to prevent divorce's «negative consequences.»

If morality is the product of subjective beliefs, anyone can do anything they wish so long as the consequences of doing so are desirable to them.

As the «outpouring» of the Spirit had come, unsought, in consequence of the life, death and resurrection of Christ, so the «indwelling» of the Spirit was the means by which He continued to form, guide and govern His Church out of the unseen world, where He was now invested with divine authority «at the right hand of God».

You ought to do whatever makes you happy, so long as it doesn't bring any undesired consequences down onto you.

If it is truly immoral, then why not say so instead of giving rules on who you can have as a slave, how much you pay, how long they need to survive after you beat them to avoid consequences, not to mention a loophole on how to keep a Jewish slave forever instead of the 7 years.

But that has the consequence of meaning that oppressive, dictatorial governments are never doing anything wrong so long as they stay in power.

Creation may be understood not so much as the consequence of God's self - expansion as of God's self - limitation.

the blood of the son of god is greater then mur and the biblea moral system its a gospel and a covenant that says we cant meet gods standard but jesus did, so everyone can be forgiven of anything if they recieve it form jesus od does nt say just cause u murdered your excluded to god sin is sin, the only difference is the level of boundary you break ad the consequence in this life, a liar gets a small consequence a murder will in this reap judgement, but to after this life god sees as we a sinned, jesus paid it all and he forgives everyone who believes in jesus for an they did

So bountiful hath been the earth and so securely have we drawn from it our substance, that we have taken it all for granted as if it were only a gift, and with little care or conscious thought of the consequences of our [ab] use of it; nor have we very much considered the essential relation that we bear to it as living parts in the vast creation.1So bountiful hath been the earth and so securely have we drawn from it our substance, that we have taken it all for granted as if it were only a gift, and with little care or conscious thought of the consequences of our [ab] use of it; nor have we very much considered the essential relation that we bear to it as living parts in the vast creation.1so securely have we drawn from it our substance, that we have taken it all for granted as if it were only a gift, and with little care or conscious thought of the consequences of our [ab] use of it; nor have we very much considered the essential relation that we bear to it as living parts in the vast creation.159