Sentences with phrase «so authors point»

Genetic modification in zebrafish models is cheap and easy, so authors point out that future research on these animal models will contribute to understand the molecular relationship that exists between the proteins involved in the physiopathology of megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy.

Not exact matches

So to answer my student's question, I pointed out that the author of the article had too narrow a definition of what a pivot meant.

The answers are rarely so straightforward, a point the authors make abundantly clear as they walk readers through the logic and evolution of the modern day org.

The author pointed out that big countries are at most risk from a trade war (so focus on smaller ones), big companies are most subject to regulatory / antitrust actions (so go small), and regional opportunities are better than global ones.

Do I personally agree with the author, to some extent, I think the 1 / 10th rule is a bit extreme almost to the point of being silly but at the same time I am a vocal advocate of living below your means so whatever gets the job done.

So, what's your point author of this article?

@ Don F. Your third paragraph simply re-makes a point the author also makes in his article... albeit you do so in an angry manner as if he didn't make that point.

So my point, was using An Anthology of Hebrew and Greek writings written by authors of different persuasions and treating it like one homogenous book of ethics is a huge mistake.

The point of all this was to say - why was it so easy to accept something written by this author when the Bible covers this topic (re: Saul visiting the witch of Endor) and everything else.

I can see how one can look at this idea and look at the following examples in Hebrews 11 as «Because they were sure they would get this reward, they did this thing» but as the author points out in verse 39 that they didn't get what they imagined they would, so if we understand faith as «being sure» it would turn out that it is «being sure» of something and being totally wrong — instead it makes more sense to understand Hebrews 11:1 as saying that «faith is a realization (or actualization)» of our hopes, a realization that the author points out is greater than we could expect and be sure in.

... So all this author was pointing out is that the theory of the big bang in no way refutes or is in conflict with a theological belief of creation, as in, «In the beginning god created the heavens and the earth» or for that matter a Buddhist belief of constant recreation.

Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.

Just as the text says more than its author knows, so its author may be living Out of that reality to which the text points.

If you have not read the book, then how is it that you can emphatically conclude that «he [the author] does so poorly...» or that «he ignores much Scripture (some that he even point out throughout his book)»?

Niebuhr continued to prick American illusions and point out the ironies of American history in two other books he jointly authored, one with Alan Heimert (A Nation So Conceived, 1963) and the other with Paul E. Sigmund (The Democratic Experience, 1969).

So, what is the point author is trying to make here?

The same God is the author of our natural intellect as well as revelation, as classical Catholic theology so often reminds us, so we should not be surprised if what the Church teaches makes wonderful sense also just from a purely natural point of view and people end up doing what the Church recommends, not because she recommends it, but just because it is the most sensible thing to do.

There are a few points in the book in which it would appear that the authors depart from their own sense of what is licit and illicit out of deferrence to certain academic Catholic bioethicists who persist in arguing for the permissibility of so - called «borderline» assisted reproductive techniques such as Gamete Intra Fallopian Transfer (GIFT) and Artificial Insemination by Husband (AIH) or insist that the Church may still allow for so - called embryo adoption.

1) going along that line, it's interesting that the authors even knew the lineage of Mary or Joseph and they also make it a point to include that jesus has a royal bloodline (presumably to hammer home that Jesus fulfills the prophecies) and the second part is that the messiah is said to be born in Bethlehem (which is widely accepted that jesus was) and Bethlehem is Josephs (not mary's) fathers land, but they do end up living in Nazareth, so it makes you wonder a couple of things, why take a very pregnant mary to Bethlehem to have her son?

Where so many solutions are possible, and so much hangs on the evidence of a single verse, it is not easy to choose; but two considerations point to the verse being the work of the author himself and having a special reference to the story of the last chapter, or to a part only of the gospel.

Your hostility proves the author's point so well.

Juel Anderson, author of The Curry Primer, has pointed out: «Through time, commercial spice mixtures have become so uniform a blend that most of us know curries only as yellow - colored foods with a standard aroma, often peppery - hot and as predictable in flavor as a Big Mac.»

The authors did point out that as their study was observational and so no firm conclusions can be drawn.

The author never said that he was signed from League 2 so I don't get your point?

Both teams have had a poor start to the campaign, Chelsea worse so than us but if it is the opinion of the author that simply because we are 3 points ahead of the champions after 4 games in that «there is little reason to think it will change any time soon» then I think he is misguided.

by the way don't know how the author came with the names of Moaninho and Martinez, they were never first choice to any ARSENAL fan, but maybe at some point the thought came because anything was / is better of what we have, the DELUDED one must leave preferably by his own accord so we can still look at him with the respect he earned in the Old Days.....

They have a shelf life of 8/10 years at the very top if they are lucky so who can begrudge them the opportunity to make hay whilst the sun is shining... am not saying Sanchez is not money driven but the way the guy plays i can mortgage my life he actually enjoys the game, enjoys wining first and foremost then money comes 2nd... like the author of the article rightly pointed out, he was in Messi's shadow at Barca and could not express himself fully, now he is at a club where he is the main man and given a free role and license to express himself and i very much doubt if he will want to go to a club like Madrid (as been rumoured in the dailies today) to relieve the bad experience he suffered at Barca because let us face facts, he is never going to displace CR7 as the main man, so even if Madrid sells Benzema or Bale to make room for him he will be back to the same position he was at Barca, this time he will be playing 2nd fiddle to CR7 so my guess is all the Madrid talks is been fed the press by his agents to drive a hard bargain when contract extension talks resumes.....

The author seems to take great pleasure in telling us about Arsenal's great achievements so far — fifth round of the cup, only two points off the top and another fantastic European campaign, qualifying for the last 16 yet again!

Further, I find this article so on point that it's as if the author interviewed many women, including me, and got our points of view.

A blog that is dedicated to how great you the author is and how she is heroically saving women from the menace of natural childbirth pointing a finger at a lactivist as a narcissist is so ironic, I don't even know where to begin.

So instead of picking through this with a fine toothed comb and boring you to death or bring up the old and annoying, «well I think this author has ties to the formula company» argument, I will just bring up a few points and thoughts that have come up for me.

But author and pediatrician Tanya Remer Altmann points out that while formula and breast milk have the same calories per ounce, breast milk is naturally more digestible and so can travel through a baby's digestive system more quickly.

The authors point out that the 85 - decibel limit is, of course, set for adults, and so it may not be conservative enough for infants, whose developing ears might be more sensitive and prone to harm.

The point of this poll is so that it reflects the opinions and wishes of this community, you know the ones who will be reading the book pick (not those who already read the book or are voting as a favor to the author).)

The study itself is published in Maternal and Child Nutrition and the authors make the point that people administering this RUTF do not need to be medically trained so this therapy can be used at home.

The scientist - authored book Authoritative Parenting, which Sax references in his book, points out that authoritative parents should be willing to negotiate and change their demands when their children reasonably object and that it is authoritarian parents who, «if challenged, threaten punishment and give «because I say so» as a reason for compliance.»

Here in time for not - so - light holiday reading is former congressman Chris Gibson's third book, Rally Point, released in early October speaks to «American exceptionalism,» a founding concept literally and figuratively familiar to the author.

My point is, if you heed the authors» recommendation to stop acting like a trainee, remember that — while it makes sense to consider your attitude and self - assurance — you shouldn't lose the qualities that make science trainees so awesome in the first place.

The authors point out that as nicotine may disrupt brain development in humans, so neonicotinoids «may adversely affect human health, especially the developing brain».

And so my point is that yeah, Martin did a wonderful favor for me but I think it was these partly due to Scott Kim; but of course it was [filtered] through Martin's intelligence, and Martin was the author of the article, but I think that somehow Scott Kim triggered it and this was very typical of how Martin worked.

As the authors put it, «coordinating the actions of a disparate collection of reserves so that they achieve more together than each can independently is, after all, the whole point of having a conservation system.»

The authors point out that this is an observational study, so no firm conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect, and add their results might not apply to the general population because the study only looked at older patients.

That means so - called open - access publishing has reached a «tipping point» and will now accelerate, suggests Éric Archambault, the lead author of the study and president of Science - Metrix Inc. in Montreal, Canada.

The authors point out that their software can help to explore the interactions between molecules in living organisms: For example, it could help determine whether molecules are slowed down by interacting with (maybe so far undiscovered) binding partners.

However, the need for the rapid point - of - care clinical application of BM stem cells for bone defect repair will not allow for the purification of hMSCs from the BM, and so, the authors assessed the effect of transient BIO exposure to whole BM samples.

I think the author meant to reference the Earth - Moon L - 1 Lagrange point, but that's an even harder concept to grasp, so I understand sidestepping the issue.

«One of the challenges with this study was that the genetic hits pointed to a gene that had not been characterized, so we were really starting from scratch in terms of grasping the biology,» says Suzanne Jacobs, the associate scientific director of the Broad's Diabetes Research Group and a co-senior author of the paper.

The authors note that there are 33 other known drugs that affect 7 - DHC levels, «so the studies reported here may point to a problem of broad scope.»

In the journal Nature Climate Change, lead author Dr. Tom Bridge from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies based at James Cook University and colleagues point out that global conservation policies have so far failed to prevent the widespread destruction of coral reefs and their fish life, which now threatens the food security of millions of people.

But the author makes SO many valid points of the ones looking only to have a good time, not actively reading the profiles, wanting more from the woman in looks and perfection but looks AND acts like a jerk or a complete slob - wasting a serious lady's precious time.