Sentences with phrase «so axiomatic»

Saying everyone is special gets us NOWHERE (as it is so axiomatic to all domains of life).

Not exact matches

So as we grow and develop our personalities and adaptive strategies, which are largely unconscious, we will have cause to reference various axiomatic truths that some can always find fault with.

trans, The account in Genesis is clearly not literally true, so any other interpretation is just that — interpretation; there is no science that confirms Genesis except in the axiomatic sense that there is a universe and there is life on earth.

For Goodwin, like John Kenneth Galbraith, Robert Heilbroner, Douglas Dowd, and so many others, is really questioning whether certain American axioms are still axiomatic.

More than that of any theologian from Augustine to Luther, Gregory's pastoral work had awesome political effect — so much so that it has become axiomatic that to understand the Middle Ages, one must understand Gregory.

Basic in the Buddha's teaching and fundamental in Buddhism is the conviction that life is not worth living and is so inescapably linked with suffering that salvation consists in a self - discipline which ends in nirvana, the dissolution of the entity called I, and so in releasing the soul from the endless succession of births and rebirths which to the Buddha was axiomatic.

After his endless lectures about purity, Frank Stella pushed his early axiomatic approach so far that The Marriage of Reason and Squalor collapsed long ago.

Reviews Jennifer Steinkamp LEHMANN MAUPIN GALLERY by Suzanne Hudson In language so pithy as to be axiomatic, Ed Ruscha suggested in a 1979 drawing that HOLLYWOOD IS A VERB.

In language so pithy as to be axiomatic, Ed Ruscha suggested in a 1979 drawing that HOLLYWOOD IS A VERB.

It's difficut to think about competing value systems these days, because the utility or price theory of value has become so entrenched with orthodox, post-classical and neo-classical economists that it has become axiomatic.

Questioning the axiomatic nature of the premise is the source of the controversy; those who do so, even mildly, are instantly labeled «deniers».

So you accept as axiomatic that anthropogenic CO2 controls the TOE, that a warmer earth imposes positive social costs (is bad), and that a cooler earth bestows negative social costs (is good)?