Sentences with phrase «so by court order»

Your information will never be sold, rented, or shared with 3rd parties unless required to do so by court order.

Only two states provide such records: North Carolina and California, the latter of which was forced to do so by court order.

Not exact matches

Doing so would require a court order signed by a judge.

Twitter has been asked by the Turkish government to block the accounts of a number of Turkish journalists, and it may ultimately be forced by court order to do so.

LinkedIn's policy is to notify Members of Requests for their data unless we are prohibited from doing so by statute or court order.

While Jesner suggests that five justices likely would rule that the federal courts should not recognize an ATS cause of action against American corporations for their overseas activities, several federal appeals courts have exhibited little willingness to limit the scope of ATS liability unless directly ordered to do so by the Supreme Court.

Unless we are prohibited from doing so by any applicable law, regulation, court order or instruction or guidance of a competent regulatory authority or agency, in terminating your account we may do any of the following at our sole discretion: A. transfer the funds back to the source; or B. convert your account balance to Bitcoins at our then - prevailing rate, subject to applicable fees and as soon as practicable give you 48 hours» notice that we intend to deactivate your account, requesting that you provide us with an alternative bitcoin wallet address to which we can transfer your bitcoin within that period (the «Redemption Period»);

So — if I understand rightly, from May 11th both parties are to cease commenting about each other by court order, and both are to remove comments about the other under their own name or pseudonym as far as they are able.

The few times when licenses have been withdrawn, the FCC has been ordered to do so by the courts, in effect, over the protests of the FCC itself.

To the extent permitted by law, we will disclose your information to government authorities or third parties if: (a) required to do so by law, or in response to a subpoena or court order; (b) we believe in our sole discretion that disclosure is reasonably necessary to protect against fraud, to protect the property or other rights of us or other users, third parties or the public at large; or (c) we believe that you have abused the Sites or the Applications by using them to attack other systems or to gain unauthorized access to any other system, to engage in spamming or otherwise to violate applicable laws.

But when the judge learned that he had lined up a job at Camp Sankaty, Flynn was given a suspended sentence so that he could earn the nearly $ 2,000 restitution ordered by the court.

From time to time, we may use your Personal Information and Traffic Data: (a) if we need to respond to valid legal process, including, but not limited to, a search warrant, subpoena, or court order, and any other instance when we believe we are required to do so by law; or (b) if we deem it necessary to disclose Personal Information or Traffic Data, in our sole discretion, to comply with any applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request, or to protect our rights or interests.

Secondly, if the father wants to register against the mother's wishes, the court, whilst it can not deny PR to any parent on child welfare grounds (as it currently prevented from doing so except for unmarried fathers), the court can use a Section 8 order to limit the exercise of PR by any parent on child welfare grounds.

-- has been so politicized by debate and sanitized by political correctness to the point that nowadays, apparently everyone is legally bound by court order to agree that all its advantages are basically negligible, a «given» that merits no special round of applause.

However, these present a rare opportunity for the US Supreme Court to overturn these kinds of orders, thus vacating the precedent set by the horrendous Korematsu decision (a decision so terrible that even Scalia spoke against it when he was still alive) and reversing the precedent set by upholding Executive orders like order 9066

Mrs. Jonathan added, «On May 3, 2017, officials of the FIRS, in a convoy of about 20 trucks and over 70 personnel, raided our client's NGO — Aridolf Jo Resort Wellness and Spa Limited — situated at Kpansia Expressway, Bayelsa State, and orchestrated a massive destruction of personal properties belonging to our client without any lawful court order or search warrant and caused mayhem there under the guise of trying to collect unpaid taxes without following any due process provided by law to do so.»

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».

The Electoral Commission must remove the name of every person from the Corrupt Practices List at the expiration of 3 years from the date of the conviction or report in respect of which his or her name is entered on the list, or sooner if so ordered by the High Court.

The UKBA «must release foreign offenders when ordered to do so by the courts and release low - risk offenders where there is no realistic prospect of removal within a reasonable period».

The court, presided over by Justice Samuel Obeng Diawuo on July 19, 2016, further ordered and barred all those claiming ownership of the property through Endurance Oti Boateng from doing so.

The release of a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court decision dictating that police need a warrant in order to search a cell phone coincides with a request by the Buffalo Police Department to purchase equipment that would transfer all data from a cell phone so it could be examined by detectives.

He claimed he was orderd to do so by a higher officer, while the court decided that such order is impossible and counted it as an instigation for murder while sentencing Ulman for committing the murder (and the higher officer also, but not for giving a criminal order but for instigating murder).

Gov. Andrew Cuomo said today that he will announce a date for a special election to fill the vacant seat of former Congressman Michael Grimm «shortly» — hours after a federal judge ordered him to do so by February 20, or expect to explain himself in court.

The embarrassment is heightened by the fact that the target was a former British army intelligence officer who had served in Northern Ireland and was in possession of secrets which were deemed so sensitive that they had been suppressed by a court order.

Apple is under court order to create software so the FBI can disable the auto - erase function on an iPhone 5c used by ISIS supporter Syed Rizwan Farook before he and his wife killed 14 people in last year's shooting rampage in San Bernardino, Calif..

Soares says he's taking a zero tolerance stance because despite the court orders, offenders continue to circumvent the law by not installing the devices at all, or tampering with the devices so that they do not work.

if required to do so by a court or administrative order, subpoena, or discovery request.

Further, we reserve the right to disclose any personal information as needed if such information is requested by law enforcement agencies or if we are requested to do so by law, regulation, court order, or by a government entity.

Although the two enjoyed a warm working relationship, it would be thrown into a crucible in the summer of»71 with the publication of the Pentagon Papers after the New York Times, which first broke the story, had been ordered to cease doing so by a court injunction.

When the Post gets its hands on Ellsberg's so - called Pentagon Papers, courtesy of reporter Ben Bagdikian (Bob Odenkirk), Bradlee sees his chance to take the newspaper bigger than its local - rag status after the Times is blocked by a federal court order.

But when the legislation passed, the only available evidence about the program consisted of testimony; a dozen or so empirical studies by the program's own staff that used primitive quasi-experimental designs; and the most - cited single study confounded the court - ordered introduction of the program with a simultaneously ordered reduction in class sizes of 40 percent.

Even so, Rossell and Baker conclude that «additional, methodologically sound research needs to be conducted in order for the courts and policymakers to make intelligent decisions» (p. 39) and that «we are struck by how small the differences are... between programs with very different amounts of English instruction» (p. 43).

(b) If the respondent named in a charge filed under section 706 fails or refuses to comply with a demand of the Commission for permission to examine or to copy evidence in conformity with the provisions of section 709 (a), or if any person required to comply with the provisions of section 709 (c) or (d) fails or refuses to do so, or if any person fails or refuses to comply with a demand by the Commission to give testimony under oath, the United States district court for the district in which such person is found, resides, or transacts business, shall, upon application of the Commission, have jurisdiction to issue to such person an order requiring him to comply with the provisions of section 709 (c) or (d) or to comply with the demand of the Commission, but the attendance of a witness may not be required outside the State where he is found, resides, or transacts business and the production of evidence may not be required outside the State where such evidence is kept.

We may also disclose any data, whether personally identifiable or not, when required to do so by subpoena, court order, or warrant.

The first thing I saw when I logged into Twitter this morning was a Tweet about this article, which reports about Amazon wiping the entire library of a user without explanation or recourse — this would be after they swore they wouldn't do so without being ordered to do so by a court following the completely ironic debacle of -LSB-...]

The first thing I saw when I logged into Twitter this morning was a Tweet about this article, which reports about Amazon wiping the entire library of a user without explanation or recourse — this would be after they swore they wouldn't do so without being ordered to do so by a court following the completely ironic debacle of them wiping copies of 1984 in 2009.

Back in 2009, when Amazon settled the lawsuit over its remote deletion of Orwell's Nineteen Eighty - Four (you really can't make this stuff up), it promised that it would not perform any further deletions unless ordered to do so by a court.

Ted Michalos: So, the first thing everyone needs to understand is that support payments are generally set by a court order or by a divorce or separation agreement that you sign off on.

And they are under a court order to do so because they had poor legal representation when they were sued by nativist groups and they have done virtually nothing to meet the requirements of the court's ruling.

We may disclose your personal information with or without your knowledge or consent when we are permitted or required to do so by applicable law, government request or court order, or based on our good faith belief that it is necessary to do so in order to comply with such law, request or court order; to enforce or apply applicable terms and conditions and other agreements; or to protect the rights, property or safety of our organization, our supporters, other users, pets in the care of organizations that we work with, the public or others.

This Puerto Rico law provides that, in all cases in which a person is accused of domestic violence or child abuse, the court shall, by petition of party, issue a protection order for the petitioner so that he / she be the sole custodian of the animal.

The Kavi Gupta will not disclose or share any personal information you provide to the Kavi Gupta with any other party without your permission, except for the following: (a) if requested to do so in accordance with a court order, subpoena, or similar legal order and (b) name and address information provided through our box - office sales provider may be exchanged by the Kavi Gupta with other cultural institutions but we do not exchange email addresses or phone numbers.

Mann to this day refuses to release his data and methods even when ordered by a court to do so.

you need to name the specific harm done and who the victims are, in a court of law you need a plantiff and defendant and counsel and specific charges in order to receive compesation, and the victims must be compensated by the wrong doers, so who are the victims here and who are the wrong doers nad where is the court decision that says so and so must pay someone or a group of someone?

The group advised Acuña to take the case to a higher - level court in order to appeal the verdict; she did so by walking a ten - hour and often treacherous hike to make court appearances.

Atlas argued that the document should only be produced for inspection by the court if necessary, and that it was not necessary to do so in order for the court to uphold its claim of privilege.

Are there obvious constitutional problems with the state court order, and if so, under what theories and supported by what precedents?»

The documents at issue were drawn up by the Legal Service not in connection with any pending cases and the Commission had only applied for leave to intervene, an application that was ultimately not granted because the cases were settled by way of orders, thus logically implying that if the court proceedings exception ever applied, it has by now ceased to do so.

If you would like to initiate a paternity proceeding, you will do so by filing an order of filiation with the family court.

In the Sturmer case, a case challenging a local option by - law, the court upheld Chancellor Boyd's order for costs against non-parties who were found to have put up «a man of straw» in whose name the litigation would be carried on so as to avoid anticipated liability for costs upon dismissal of the action.