Sentences with phrase «so by sacrificing»

Meanwhile, the few studies that involve a higher spatial resolution generally do so by sacrificing the temporal coverage of the data, providing them with a «case study» point of view of a particular weather event, rather than robust statistics required for an understanding of climate.

Many of the men who work hard to set up their financial futures do so by sacrificing a considerable amount of their personal lives.

Not exact matches

Who could have foreseen that OPEC would decide to sacrifice billions of dollars by refusing to curb production, just so it could hurt shale - oil producers in the United States?

The Province of B.C. is willing to make significant environmental sacrifices for projects that will bring economic benefits to the Province of B.C.. On the other hand, they will block a project needed by a land - locked sister province, a project that would benefit all of Canada, claiming that they are doing so because they must protect the environment, protect the land from damage and reduce global warming.

You often tend to sacrifice these wants because of this but there is no need to do so as there is always multiple numbers of financial aids provided by various financial institutions provided across the word.

«He's an egomaniac devoid of all moral sense» ---- said the society woman dressing for a charity bazaar, who dared not contemplate what means of self - expression would be left to her and how she would impose her ostentation on her friends, if charity were not the all - excusing virtue ---- said the social worker who had found no aim in life and could generate no aim from within the sterility of his soul, but basked in virtue and held an unearned respect from all, by grace of his fingers on the wounds of others ---- said the novelist who had nothing to say if the subject of service and sacrifice were to be taken away from him, who sobbed in the hearing of attentive thousands that he loved them and loved them and would they please love him a little in return ---- said the lady columnist who had just bought a country mansion because she wrote so tenderly about the little people ---- said all the little people who wanted to hear of love, the great love, the unfastidious love, the love that embraced everything, forgave everything, and permitted everything ---- said every second - hander who could not exist except as a leech on the souls of others.»

Death has been overcome by Christ's sacrifice on Calvary, and those who put their trust in Him will live again, «For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life (John 3:16).

Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish zombie can make you live forever if you accept a blood sacrifice and symbolically eat his flesh and drink his blood, and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a woman made from a rib was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree: makes perfect sense

A big magic fairy man spoke a spell and then there was earth and light before stars and then a snake talked to a woman and then the big magic fairy man had to sacrifice himself to himself to appease himself by exploiting a loophole in a plan he made himself because of an invisible disease (sin) in an invisble body part (soul) so that he doesn't have to torture us forever in the big fire pit he made even though he doesn't want anyone to ever go there but he just can't help himself.

Christianity: The belief that a big invisible sky wizard chanted magic spells to make the universe and then had to sacrifice himself to himself to save us from a punishment he made himself by exploiting a loop hole in a plan he made himself so he doesn't have to torture you forever and ever in his torture pit.

But our Father is a fair and just God who wishes us all to seek his comfort, peace, serenity, guidance and spiritual abundance and who demonstrated sacrifice by sending His son Jesus who endured great pain and suffering so we could be free indeed.

So then no Adam and Eve = no original sin = Jesus didn't need to be sent to die for my sins by a God who concluded «He» couldn't forgive us without one more blood sacrifice.

People burned as witches, blacks lynched by Christians in this county, people killed in human sacrifices, servants killed to accompany pharaohs on their journeys to the afterlife, untold numbers of people killed in various cultures because they were deemed to have offended God in some way, and so on.

After all, it is argued, the Romans themselves did not appear to take it seriously (Vespasian's famous deathbed joke, «I think I am becoming a god» seems to indicate as much): it could only be believed by those who were either insane, such as Caligula, who went so far as to sacrifice to himself daily and made his beloved horse a high priest of his cult, or irredeemably barbarian and by implication, stupid, such as the Britons of Colchester who built an enormous temple to the Divine Claudius.

This is why Jesus died, to provide the atoning sacrifice through His blood, so that people who are under the wrath of God might find forgiveness and justification, not by their works, but by faith.

Many believe that the first sacrifice was carried out by God Himself in Genesis 3:21 which says that God made tunics of skin for Adam and Eve so that they could be clothed.

Even so, Marcion clearly tried to lift up a God of sublime benevolence for the alternative church he founded, but he was able to do so only by sacrificing the essential unity between love (his Supreme God) and power (his unloving Creator God).28

and second, the approach to God by way of animal offerings had been so central in Judaism that, while the sacrifices were always accompanied by supplications, they had competed with personal prayer, had furnished for many people a public substitute for it, so that when the bloody altars were gone a devout rabbi could mingle his exaltation of private communion with the lament «We have nothing to bring but prayer.»

I don't know... there's no record of him following the temple laws regarding sacrifices, or encouraging his followers to do so, presumably because he fulfilled the purpose of the sacrifices that were commanded by God...?

Because humans are so weak in their love, so easily distracted, so fearful of love's sacrifice, God Himself had to strengthen the weak vessel of flesh by taking fleshupon Himself and showing of what it is capable.

Religious freedom is willingly sacrificed and will be increasingly so when the Equality Bill introduced by Harriet Harman is implemented.

God, suggests Fishbane, is so embarrassed by Abraham's willingness to sacrifice his son that He refuses to speak with him directly, but sends his messenger instead.

«Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, when he was about to offer himself once on the altar of the Cross to God the Father, making intercession by means of his death, so that he might gain there an eternal redemption, since his priesthood was not to be extinguished by death, at the last Supper, «on the night that he was handed over», left to his beloved Spouse the Church a visible sacrifice, such as the nature of man requires, by which the bloody sacrifice achieved once upon the Cross might be represented and its memory endure until the end of the age, and its saving power be applied to the remission of those sins which are daily committed by us.»

By faith, I believe in Jesus as the revelation of God to the world... that he was a sacrifice for our sins so that we could be reconciled back to God.

The significance of the sacrifices was to see our sinfulness and turn our hearts back to God and that is made clear with the death of Christ.The animals though could not remove our sin that was only possible through Christ as God he could remove sin in the past present and future as he is outside of time and space not like us.So there sins in effect were covered by Jesus as well in the old testament as in the new by Gods we just did nt see it.The example of abraham able enoch they all were righteous they were justified before God.Enoch walked with God and was no more that sounds like the rapture to me so the holy spirit was present in that age just like us.We see that God has always been at work to bring life and to bring mankind to salvation.

What God is looking for is repentence and a turning to him rather than a turning away from him.God instituted the animal sacrifices to show just how bad sin was so we would be sorry that we greived him.For us to be made right there has to be a choice to turn from sin and follow him and out of that decision there should be a desire to walk in his ways.Under the old law part of that obedience was to make offerings however it was by faith in God that made the person righteous and not the blood of animals.

God sacrificed Himself, so man would know just how much we're loved by the Father.

Craig thanks for commenting the issue i have is that we are saved by faith and by the grace of God both in the old and the new.Not by the blood sacrifices of animals i am not saying they are not important as they served an important role in the old testament.But even if cain had offered a lamb his sacrifice would still not have been accepted because it wasnt given in faith but by works his heart wasnt right so his offering wasnt accepted.

Common good means that it is good for more than just one group of people — by definition that means that sometimes you need to sacrifice things that are good for you so others can have some of that «good», and vice versa.

The purposes of the Law were brought to an end by the coming of our Life giver, who offered himself in place of the sacrifices in the Law, and was led like a lamb to the slaughter in place of the lamb of propitiation... He gave his blood for all mankind, so that the blood of animals should not be required of us.

Third, when Hebrews seeks to portray Yeshua's priestly service, it does so by associating it not with the non-Jew Melchizedek's sacrifice but with the sacrifices of Israel.

If modern liberal education is to provide for the nurture of free men, it must regain the ideal of generality which characterized the traditional liberal arts, but it must do so without sacrificing the variety and scope made possible by modern advances in knowledge.

okay so lets start a new religion that says we need to sacrifice 2 Northern Arapaho Indians for every bald eagle sacrificed by them cause my creator says that will make it happy — losers oh and SB killing something for food is VERY different than killing something for no reason!

But there is no grave of Jesus Christ becaue s grave and death could not hold Him, for HE was a sinless lamb, who gave His life for sinners, so that by His sacrifice we would be reconciled to God.

In so doing, some sacrifice of completeness has been made, but by this means the reader will be able to understand that both these writers have a single purpose: to declare the meaning and content of the ministry, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Thus the union with Christ means a most intimate and vital companionship with him, keeping Him before our eyes and in our hearts, and being permeated by the highest love, so that we can turn our hearts, toward our brothers, united with us through Him, and for whom He had sacrificed himself.

My brother sacrificed a huge offering to a certain ministry and packed up and allowed his successful business to be ran by someone else to be part of that ministry and about lost his business; and his son to this day was so damaged by that «ministry» that he is not even living for Christ anymore, years later.

Christ sent the apostles to proclaim his death and resurrection to every creature so that, the document continues, «they might accomplish the work of salvation which they had proclaimed, by means of sacrifice and sacraments, around which the entire liturgical life revolves».

By doing so, you demonstrate to the world that before you are a citizen of America, you are a citizen of a new Kingdom, inaugurated by the One whose sacrifice unites those who are often far aparBy doing so, you demonstrate to the world that before you are a citizen of America, you are a citizen of a new Kingdom, inaugurated by the One whose sacrifice unites those who are often far aparby the One whose sacrifice unites those who are often far apart.

So long as the mind is captivated by memory, and really feels itself to be that past image which is «I» it can do nothing to save itself; it's sacrifices are of no avail, and it's Law gives no life.

Mother Teresa put it like this: «We are trying to make bombs of love, of prayer, of sacrifice, to overcome the world by love, and so bring God's love and the proof that God loves the world as a living reality into the hearts of all.»

Remeber the sacrifice you made in sending Jesus the Messiah, remember the sinless life He led and the pain He bore for all of those who sinned and are so vary far, far away from you, living in darkness, blinded by the false gods of this world and the lying deceiving spirits that say man's reason is all there is in life.

So, Hebrews tells us that by faith Abel brought a more excellent sacrifice, and also that without faith it is impossible to please God.

so by knowing that God has sacrificed His Only SON, and (you particularly), or a person, should «choose» NOT to accept God's invitation to «eternal» life, through His Beloved Son, you think He «s being «particle `... huh... is that what you're saying?

Nevertheless, besides the issue of natural justice, I think that desire is defined as something that is considered to have a so - called positive outcome, so I would think that on a personal level self - immolation has no personal desire (unless «fame» and / or desire to die are there) and it is surely painful to the person self - immolating (unlike e.g. self - explosion), and the thing being probably considered by individual persons as social sacrifice.

So, to save man, the designer makes himself into a man, sacrifices himself to himself, so that man can avoid failing the test by simply believing that the designer really did sacrifice himself... to himself?So, to save man, the designer makes himself into a man, sacrifices himself to himself, so that man can avoid failing the test by simply believing that the designer really did sacrifice himself... to himself?so that man can avoid failing the test by simply believing that the designer really did sacrifice himself... to himself???

He created man knowing he would fail (omniscience), then sent his avatar to earth to die for that sin that was baked in by him so that we would be grateful for his sacrifice and love him.

The great achievements of the Hebrew prophets, from one point of view, were their insistence that God is not to be approached in this external fashion and their success in securing a general consent by the Jewish people to the proposition that «the sacrifices of God are a troubled spirit» — that God wishes the offering to Him of the whole life of His people, both as individuals and as a group, not for His own glorification but rather so that He might effectively use them for the accomplishment of great ends: the redemption of the world and the opening of rich life for His children.

The self - giving or self - sacrifice we have so far described, is not yet the self - giving which is claimed by the Gospel.

It is true, as St. Paul says that Christ loved the Church and sacrificed himself to make her holy, making her clean by baptism, but he is waiting to take those souls to himself so that they will be glorious, with no speck or wrinkle, but holy and without blemish (Eph.