Sentences with phrase «so by the climatologists»

In other words, adjacent bodies at different temperatures stopped obeying the laws of physics until called on to do so by the climatologists.

Not exact matches

So, the estimated safe threshold identified by the scientists, including NASA climatologist James Hansen, is 350 ppm, or a total increased warming of one watt per meter squared (current warming is roughly 1.5 watts per meter squared).

Indeed, although climatologists and other scientists have long focused on gases in the atmosphere, they have not closely examined the role played by so - called condensed phase particles.

So who's going to sponsor a full - page ad stating the mainstream scientific position / correcting those misleading statements, signed by hundreds of ACTUAL CLIMATOLOGISTS?

The Niskanen Center, which calls itself a libertarian think tank, has a Center for Climate Science directed by Dr. Joseph Majkut, a climatologist who previously served on the staff of Brulle's ally Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse.52 The think tank R Street is so well known for its friendliness to a carbon tax that when we published a study critical of the carbon tax, we invited it to contribute a defense of the tax.53 And as the present study goes to press, prominent Republicans at the Hoover Institution like George Schultz and James Baker are advocating vigorously for a carbon tax.54

The solid evidence lies in the fact that estimates of the so - called Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity are less than the minimum set for it by the climatologists.

Basically the climatologists who have produced hockey stick shaped graphs have done so by carefully selecting proxies that produce the results they want.

So although the number of northerly stations was cut in the 80s / 90s, it doesn't introduce a warm bias, because of the way the averaging of stations is done by the climatologists who do actually know about these things.

Among the works cited by the article is one by the climatologist Kevin Trenberth in which he states that the IPCC has never made so much as one prediction.

«Climate Science» is a field invented by and for CAGW believers who either choose not to call themselves meteor - / climatologists, because that's not where the grant money is, or who in addition may not do so because they are in fact neither.

If Pope's hypothesis explains climate changes for the last 50 million years or so, it seems better than any of the loony climate models pushed by «climatologists».

So even the «many climatologists» cited by Jaworowski fail to predict a runaway greenhouse effect — or a «new Ice Age» for that matter.

The reasons for that are many: the timid language of scientific probabilities, which the climatologist James Hansen once called «scientific reticence» in a paper chastising scientists for editing their own observations so conscientiously that they failed to communicate how dire the threat really was; the fact that the country is dominated by a group of technocrats who believe any problem can be solved and an opposing culture that doesn't even see warming as a problem worth addressing; the way that climate denialism has made scientists even more cautious in offering speculative warnings; the simple speed of change and, also, its slowness, such that we are only seeing effects now of warming from decades past; our uncertainty about uncertainty, which the climate writer Naomi Oreskes in particular has suggested stops us from preparing as though anything worse than a median outcome were even possible; the way we assume climate change will hit hardest elsewhere, not everywhere; the smallness (two degrees) and largeness (1.8 trillion tons) and abstractness (400 parts per million) of the numbers; the discomfort of considering a problem that is very difficult, if not impossible, to solve; the altogether incomprehensible scale of that problem, which amounts to the prospect of our own annihilation; simple fear.

The following site has the 10 deadliest, 10 costliest, and 10 most intense hurricanes: - http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2005/hurricanes/ RE --(To counter the «matter of fact» smug cycle theorists, there has to be a proper history recounted by climatologists capable of recounting that there was so called similar year (s), the «it was just as bad as in the 1940's» ball is lobbed out, now we have to say, ho ya??? When then??

I am also ready to listen to the memories of Elders from the Gulf and Carribean about how similar 2005 is say to any year??? To counter the «matter of fact» smug cycle theorists, there has to be a proper history recounted by climatologists capable of recounting that there was so called similar year (s), the «it was just as bad as in the 1940's» ball is lobbed out, now we have to say, ho ya??? When then??

So says a new study published in Science, in which a team of climatologists, led by Columbia University's Seok - Woo Son, found that as ozone depletion reverses in the Southern Hemisphere, the stratosphere will begin to rapidly warm up.