Sentences with phrase «so couple of questions»

So a couple of questions:

Ok, so couple of questions then.

Not exact matches

So, here are a couple of questions that we might apply to our own experience:

So, let me ask you a couple of questions.

Ok, so I looked in the mirror for the very first time and I have a couple of questions.

So instead of jumping on the racism thing how about asking the obvious question??? What is it about THIS couple that sparked the congregants to speak up against it???

So that should answer a couple of questions for you.

The «minority «group that was so vehemently against this couple getting married in the church in question should be made to pay for the couple's wedding costs as a form of amends.

On a Potluck Hangout we had last night, «I Think I'm An Atheist»... we've made this one public so that you can watch it... a couple of our participants said that they were about 16 years old when they really began asking questions and were met with resistance.

That's what I call a rhetorical question, so just add a couple of tablespoons of cocoa powder if you agree (and you do..

I want to pickle the habaneros, so I have a couple of questions for you: 1.

(because we tried a couple of them already with chocolate and coconut or hazelnut cover, and they taste great:)-RRB- Another question: could you recommend irish moss, because this is the first time I try it, and I bought this in Czech Republic (it was the last pack), so I definitely would like to experiment more:)-RRB-, but it's hard to choose from the online selection.

And, Frankly I'm getting tired of isopure: / So... couple questions: Can / should I eat this * every * morning b4 my workout?

The marshmallows are in the pan now, so I'll see how I did in a few hours, but I have a couple of questions.

So it is not a question of whether we will have to find a new manager, the question is whether it will be now (at the end of the season) or within the next couple of years.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

No one is questioning Wenger's past achievements, but he has had three seasons and 5 transfer windows to get the necessary players i.e a top sttiker and a dm which are glaring deficiencies in our squad and yet he ignores it and this summer was an example of how delusional he has become, by making statements like there no players available which could improve our squad, while treble winner barca even with their transfer ban get couple in, same with Bayern, Madrid and all other big clubs because they know you have constantly improve their squads to compete, and by making that statement he implied that he has one of the best sqauds in Europe, so can you please tell me whether you are optimistic about our chances against Bayern?

So, you do NOT THINK the Media and Pundits CAN question the SPUDS Manager, the Utd Manager, the Everton Manager, the Pool Manager, or, their «modern ways», especially after results the last couple of weeks.

We have been linked to top players but I seriously doubt Wenger has said no to them or refuses to pay a couple million more, he has never shown that ignorance in the past so it leads to the question of!

It's the fans that keep sacrificing because this team can't get their head out of their own ass... please give me some examples when a top club ever let their best player leave for free at the end of a season... Wenger needs to go to PSG and get some money and talent for Sanchez so that we can end this nonsense once and for all... then he needs to publicly apologize for the way in which they handled the whole situation... if they allow Sanchez to go for free there is no way this club, under the tutelage of Kroenke and Wenger, will ever layout the necessary coin to replace such a talented player, especially considering that Wenger will be a lame - duck manager once again in the final year of his contract and we know how well that went last year... open your eyes people, Wenger has spoken publicly about how he hopes that the next manager can take this club to the next level... WHAT?!?... he then went on to speak about leaving them in the perfect position to be successful, which is one of the reasons why several pundits felt Wenger would leave after last season based on the financials and the fact that so many players had only one year left on their respective contracts... who says this shit??? If you believe you're leaving things in the best possible shape for your potential successor to achieve greatness it raises a couple of serious questions: Why can't you take things to the next level if everything is as great as you say?

But the question of who'll fill Massa's boots is one that isn't likely to be answered until the season has finished so for now, let's just enjoy the final couple of races of one of F1's great competitors.

Well, there's absolutely nothing to report today so I thought I'd to use this post to throw out a couple of questions:

So, if we agree that staying in an abusive relationship will never be considered «transformational,» but some believe that staying in a marriage in which there has been infidelity can be transformational for the couple, I again question the idea that infidelity is a form of abuse.

Here are the answers offered to the question about how the respondents feel about hearing about a couple who has been married for 50 years: «Wow, what an inspiring accomplishment» or «Yikes, they must be so tired of each other.»

We've had a couple of questions about discrepancies and changes recently too, so we thought we'd try to clear those up.

So I asked Dr. Edmond Chan, the co-author of the statement on Dietary Exposures and Allergy Prevention in High - Risk Infants for his thoughts on a couple of questions.

I was so excited when, after asking me a couple of questions, he said he would be interested in trying them.

So Kevin, I asked a couple of really simple (and I think fair) questions below, to try to make sure that I had all the facts before addressing anything more.

All of which means commitment only goes so far, and it seems to reach an ugly yet not surprisingly predictable end when someone's schtupping someone he or she's not supposed to (and because we're only asking the engaged couples to answer a teeny - tiny portion of the questions in our book, we haven't even gotten to the good stuff, like asking them to define what infidelity means to them: Watching porn?

So first of all, I want to give you guys awesome props because our listener shift for Newbies has increased pretty dramatically over last couple months, so I don't like to question that, it just like to say, hey thank you guys for listening to the shoSo first of all, I want to give you guys awesome props because our listener shift for Newbies has increased pretty dramatically over last couple months, so I don't like to question that, it just like to say, hey thank you guys for listening to the shoso I don't like to question that, it just like to say, hey thank you guys for listening to the show.

So, a couple of questions, is that seat as bad as the bumbo?

s are very small and many of them are at the house of instructors, it feels very personal and couples can get relaxed so they can exercises various relaxation methods and ask as many questions as they like.

Questioning Trident has been a big taboo in Labour Party policy circles for a couple of decades or so.

What a great couple of questions they were... by far the highlights of this session so far.

Whether it will do so depends on what it thinks the answers are to a couple of key questions:

It was not, it's fair to say, universally welcomed by Labour supporters and there was particular criticism of it being backed up with a couple of poll questions showing people agreed with a statement «We must live within our means so cutting the deficit is the top priority».

YouGov did the fieldwork for two academic election surveys (the British Election Study and the SCMS) as well as their daily polling, and all three used different question ordering (daily polling asked voting intention first, SCMS after a couple of questions, the BES after a bank of questions on important issues, which party is more trusted and party leaders) so will allow testing of the effect of «priming questions».

I can't see any other questions in the Standard's report, but in the past they've tended to commission polls and then report results over a couple of days, so there may yet be more.

But it's not the acquisition of techniques per se that matters, most say, so much as the willingness to try new things, coupled with sufficient neurobiology expertise to understand what questions to ask.

«We've got a lot of questions and we have a lot of interest and energy, so we expect to learn a lot in the next couple of years,» he said.

So, Lucas, I will ask you the first question that is a question that in one shape or the other, I have been asking you for the last couple of years since we started this.

A couple of questions... there are so many different terms for «vegetable oil» is there a list to help me decipher labels better?

I see this thread is about a year old, so not sure you'll see this Keenan, but I'm intrigued by the benefits you've found (I also have a major foot pain issue) yet at the same time I've found Peat's recommendations so strange that I thought hopefully you could answer a couple of questions.

Thanks so much for helping us all:) I'm trying to take in as much as I can here and I just had a couple of questions for you.

So I have a couple of questions for you.

I'm soon to launch a site of my own so it's always good to learn from other's successes:) Anyway — Figured out I am an endomorph, and have a couple questions about that.

So a couple of days ago I asked for your best diet, nutrition, weight loss, weight gain, weight training, muscle building, product, supplement and food questions.

So a couple of days ago I asked for your best diet, nutrition, weight loss, weight gain, weight training, muscle building, product, supplement and food questions for the purpose of a little Q&A.

So here is the question: If an approach works for one out of every couple thousand people who tries it, would you try it or call it a good or efficient approach?

Last week I posed a couple questions to you guys (one about blog content, one about travel) and I really enjoyed chatting with so many of you.