Sentences with phrase «so dogmatic»

A big reason is that Google has shipped a new version of the software that isn't so dogmatic about making you bark commands at the watch anymore.

However, for this to happen faster, some social engineering needs to be done to bring those two groups together so that meat - eaters can appreciate that vegetable dishes can be just as or even better than meat, and vegetarians can stop being so dogmatic about their views on food politics.

I've basically been thinking that way ever since, but now I just don't feel so dogmatic about it.

That should tell you something if you're not so dogmatic.

We all have different usage patterns, so dogmatic reviews are not that useful to many readers.

please he's either with an Archaic mentality or so Dogmatic.

Someone that is so dogmatic in your stance should be put to a good work.

Why can atheists be so dogmatic: «There's a right way to think, and there's a wrong way.

Not exact matches

So please, go read your bible and believe your half truths and dogmatic lies.

It's so much less dogmatic than atheism.

When it comes to dogmatic absolutism you, Frank, Old Adam and even Brigitte to a lesser degree have a similar epistemology and, for all of our disagreements, neither Gary nor I are dogmatic absolutists and so share a similar epistemological perspective.

That would seem to imply that theology for a person of faith is more speculative than dogmatic, certainly not the dogmatic absolutism that closes minds and often hearts that we see in so many who profess faith.

Of course, we are both engaging in speculative interpretation / theology, not dogmatic theology; so neither of our opinions should pose a challenge to anyone's faith.

Give us some insight into why you so relentlessly pursue publishing your world - view, especially here, in a place of questions, rather than a place of dogmatic anything.

@JohnR For ages the church has been accused of being behind the times, monolithic, dogmatic and so on.

So the problem is with the dogmatic mindset... the attitude... not the ideas that nourish it.

The line can not be drawn so sharply that we can afford to be dogmatic about it.

On that basis it is conceivable that genuine «progress» in dogmatic development in the future will move, not so much in the direction of a wider, more exact unfolding and precise definition of traditional dogma, but simply in that of a more living, radical grasp and statement of the ultimate fundamental dogmas themselves.

For life within the Catholic Church, the stumbling - block as regards change in the Church's doctrine is not so much the question of defined dogmas as other doctrines of the Church in dogmatic and moral theology which are taught authoritatively but which in principle can not count as defined doctrines of faith or as irreformable dogma.

It could be pointed out that the Church's magisterium can establish what are termed «dogmatic facts», that the Church can infallibly know that a particular human being is in heaven, and so on.

The technical disciplines taught in universities and seminaries - technical dogmatics, ethics, spirituality, apologetics, missiology, historical theology, and so forth - find their value as they lead to richer biblical interpretation.

Dogmatics are for the sake of Scripture study, not vice versa, and so with all technical branches of theology.

mont: «So when Nah responds that a logical, well thought out statement is an «ad hominem» based on his own mindless medieval dogmatic beliefs, he is the one actually committing the «ad hominem»»

Just as we all know Whitehead's emphasis on atomic units, so we should also recognize Russell's presentation of organic unities, and not to take simple metaphors in an exclusive and dogmatic way.

It was a very just thought to which the older dogmatic frequently recurred, whereas a later dogmatic so often censored it for lack of understanding and a proper sense of its meaning — it was a very just thought, although sometimes a wrong application was made of it: the thought that what makes sin so frightful is that it is before God.

Niebuhr was so incredibly busy it is hard to imagine him sitting quietly in his study long enough to write a Church Dogmatics.

So long as he operates as theologian at all, whether his work is dogmatic or eristic, it all depends upon and serves God's revelation of himself in Jesus Christ.

Attacks by Christian theologians such as Barth upon this whole enterprise are justified in so far as there was for a long time a tendency to regard the discussion with unbelief as a kind of prolegomenon to dogmatics itself.

But his battles were mostly fought with so - called «West Coast» Straussians, whose dogmatic interpretation of natural rights was very different from their namesake's Socratic skepticism.

By a strange misunderstanding, a so - called speculative dogmatic, which certainly - has suspicious dealings with philosophy, has entertained the notion that it is able to comprehend this definition of sin as a position.

Any Christian that disagrees is too close minded, too indoctrination, too dogmatic to understand the very simple reason why... Truth, so far as religion is concerned, is in the eye of the beholder.

That being said, the renewal of interest ought not to be overstated: much doctrinal theology in English remains preoccupied with keeping up a conversation with other fields of inquiry (often literary and cultural theory) and is so eager to do so that it often neglects the descriptive or dogmatic tasks of systematics.

Barth's attention is so focussed on certain traditional dogmatic concepts, Tillich's on his ontology, that both look away from the truth that is implicit in what they say.

In the process, Barr exposes other foibles of more recent efforts to maintain that tradition of interpretation: a tendency toward specialization in historical and linguistic cognate fields that avoids theological issues and ironically reduces them to matters archaeological and historical; a style of «maximal conservativism» that approximates earlier positions taken on dogmatic grounds by a current process of selectively appropriating the most conservative elements of a variety of more critical positions; a surprising (and again ironic) tendency to offer «naturalistic» reinterpretations of the miraculous within the highly supernaturalistic inerrancy framework; and so on.

Says he: «When both Judaism and Christianity acknowledge that it is fundamentally one religion, one faith, and do not deny it, as still happens so much either out of ignorance or out of dogmatic prejudices — then they can really debate with each other.»

This initially occurs in Descartes and Spinoza, but it becomes far more comprehensive in Schelling and Hegel, and so much so that the whole body of dogmatic theology undergoes a metamorphosis into pure philosophical thinking in Hegel's system.

But in fact many of us are not, and are not going to be, existentialists of the Heidegger school, and so we try to see what Bultmann's position amounts to if we leave the dogmatic existentialism out.

Perhaps conservative evangelicals run the risk of being needlessly dogmatic on some issues, thereby alienating the next generation, while progressives are in danger of giving up so much historic doctrine that their faith is starting to look more like Campolo's humanism than historic Christianity.

In situations like this, when the critical conclusions are ambiguous (as is so often the case), scholars tend to become dogmatic in order to defend the critical method.

Elementary children in the Church can sometimes embrace their parents views and be much more dogmatic about them, so I would be very on guard for a potential negative comments from classmates and would want the leader to cut off any kind of negative peer response as quickly as possible.

Rejecting Paul's confidence, and the inevitable dogmatic corollary, Hick's solution is that God has intentionally made the world ambiguous — i.e., has intentionally created it «to look as if there were no God» so that we can come to faith freely.

So in the final chapter, Lanzetta questions post-Conciliar approaches to ecumenism where the «dogmatic» (to do with knowing the truth) is juxtaposed to the «pastoral» «which starts out from the historic and pragmatic fact, and on behalf of this aims at possible dialogue, without changing teaching, but de facto neither improving understanding of it, but even with the risk of altering its significance by virtue of the dialogue method chosen...».

8:3) and in so doing exposed himself to the notitia (Notitia is a term used in dogmatics.

Catholics in the last fifty years or so have almost completely ceased to do dogmatic theology.

Perhaps American religion's recent conservative shift has so affected the mood of the schools that denominational seminaries must now battle just to hold on to the gains made in the 1950s and «60s (such as commitments to practical theology, to historical - critical hermeneutics and to revisioning traditional dogmatics).

Its metaphysics is equally compatible and equally incompatible with the sensibilities of any number of faiths, and of any number of schools within individual faiths; but, if it has anything resembling a theology, it is of the mystical, rather than the dogmatic, kind, and so its doctrinal content is nebulous.

Judaism is even older so don't hold you breath waiting for an end to «dogmatic religion».

It is a tragedy that so many of our leaders today (and all of those ignorant fools who elect them on the basis of their religious beliefs) are guided by their brainwashed, dogmatic belief in what amounts to no more than a very elaborate story of Santa Claus.

The Spirit of politics and the lust of dogmatic rule are then apt to enter and to contaminate the originally innocent thing; so that when we hear the word «religion» nowadays, we think inevitably of some «church» or other; and to some persons the word «church» suggests so much hypocrisy and tyranny and meanness and tenacity of superstition that in a wholesale undiscerning way they glory in saying that they are «down» on religion altogether.

We suggest, then - though still holding that specific, dogmatic answers are impossible - that the poem in substantially its present form came into existence within a century or so of the event of the Exodus; in repeated, annual liturgical use it probably became relatively «fixed»; and probably it was appropriately modified, possibly chiefly in interpretation, when the cultic rehearsal of God's creation of Israel was shifted to Jerusalem.