The working group are supporting a platform of international rules for the blockchain network enabling
so global money transfers over a blockchain by 2018.
Not exact matches
When we bought our first plane, air travel was considered very expensive, extremely frustrating and awfully dull; more recently, the banking sector has been held responsible for the financial crisis and
global recession,
so we used our reputation to instil some trust and, as Virgin
Money's slogan says, «Make everyone better off.»
It sounds complicated, but
so is the current world of moving
money and
global trade.
So the alternative is no tax at all domestically, creating a true territorial taxation system where companies can be free to bring
money back to the states to use for investment here, while also reinvesting in other companies as they build their
global enterprises.
Western Australia has reclaimed its position at centre stage in the
money world, not because it is sucking in development capital but more
so because it has become a
global cash cow.
This is what I wrote about in the Financial Times yesterday: the U.S. refusal to cooperate with other countries, above all its double standard insisting that other countries must turn their foreign - exchange surpluses over to the U.S. Treasury to promote U.S. financial markets at their expense — and the demand that any country running a trade surplus with America spend the
money on U.S. arms — is
so abhorrent that other countries are proceeding to create an alternative
global financial system of settling trade and balance - of - payments transactions without the United States.
«I am not yet finished; nor do I believe we are ever to have a perfect understanding of
so complex a system as the
global money machine.
After all, investors are investing their
money in your project,
so they have a right to know that the company is doing something to resolve a
global problem.
So what happens is all the money that has been lent out, the collateral has been repledged so many times, something called rehypothecation, across the global world within the Euro / Dollar system that the issue now is a shortage of collatera
So what happens is all the
money that has been lent out, the collateral has been repledged
so many times, something called rehypothecation, across the global world within the Euro / Dollar system that the issue now is a shortage of collatera
so many times, something called rehypothecation, across the
global world within the Euro / Dollar system that the issue now is a shortage of collateral.
Fixed - income investments are unattractive, at such low interest rates,
so all that «easy
money» will go into stocks, says Allen Sinai, chief
global economist for Decision Economics.
The Bank for International Settlements, the
so - called central bank for central banks, thinks
global market volatility is here to stay as policymakers unwind years of easy
money and quantitative easing.
Clubs such as Chelsea were average (at best) before their
money wielding saviour came galloping along,
so why not transform your club into the next
global super power buy throwing all your
money into the transfer kitty?
How can we accept this kind of embarrassment and shame for a club who spends
so much
money on players with a much bigger
global brand, and fans paying
so much for tickets?
We always had wages structures that were respected and players earn
so much
money now that the cases have become much more individual than
global.
with
so much
money in cash reserves perhaps Stan Kroenke is insisting on holding ever bigger amounts in Arsenal in order to satisfy his creditors elsewhere that he always has a large supply of cash on tap if he should need to call on it kroenke completed his Rams takeover with an acquisition of 60 % of its share capital in August 2010, less than eight months before paying # 250 million to take his shareholding in Arsenal beyond 60 % when the
global financial system was in crisis
Now that we have the
money and stadium almost paid (easily managed now), we are a
global brand and commercially up there with the best of teams,
so why are we still at the same level we are at?
Kimberly Ramsawak is the founder of Professional Jetsetter where she helps professional ambitious women travel the world more and make
money while doing it,
so that they can enjoy the
global lifestyle they've always dreamed of without having to give up their financial security.
Sandler's comedies have made more than $ 3bn worldwide,
so there is the potential for a huge amount of
money to disappear from the
global box office during the four - film deal.
As on other Fiestas, nothing seemed to have been thrown out to make the car lighter or cheaper in some effort to get an extra fraction of 1 mpg,
so the plastics were good for the segment, and there weren't any parts that seemed like they were picked out of some
global parts bin to save
money.
The fund is just one manifestation of Artisan's
Global Value strategy
so one possible explanation is that Artisan is shifting assets around inside the $ 16 billion strategy, moving
money from separate accounts into the fund.
The trend suggests the
so - called» smart
money,» the large managed funds that report to the CFTC, had started to back away from silver and «retail investors picked up the slack,» said Tom Pawlicki, a precious metals analyst with MF
Global in Chicago.
Amazon Mechanical Turk (also known as MTurk) is a cloud platform system that brings together requesters and workers
so one can make
money by completing small tasks known as HITS and the other can have their work done by a
global workforce in a fast and convenient manner.
Money flowing into Canadian - listed ETFs shows a growing preference for international equities over domestic stocks which have generally struggled to perform on par with their
global counterparts
so far this year.
So because, as Editor - In - Chief Matt Stabile relentlessly reminds us, time is
money, here is the quick and dirty, abbreviated lowdown on
global cities where you can return to the homestead with a semi-fat wallet.
If, for example, Big CO2 Inc. wanted to put a billion dollars down on
global cooling, 2 things would happen — the web would be full of «sign up and take some
money from Big CO2 Inc.» emails, and, more importantly, some of the people who think it's a slam dunk for
global warming might temper their predictions just a bit because some clown put
so much
money down on the opposite outcome.
As I watched one document of
global warming, in it one business succesed man was interviewed, he said that he get many thing,
money, house, and car and
so on, this is important, envrionmental problem is the last thing.
As a disclaimer, I will confess that these changes are not due to the magnanimity of the consumers who want to alleviate the potentially devastating effects of
Global Warming, but instead are primarily due to the fact that people don't want to spend
so much
money on gas (and they use the
Global Warming argument as a backup to assuage their conscience)
Different topic: we need some type of clearinghouse to announce when prominent or semi-prominent people deny
global warming,
so people like me will know to ask them if they'll put their
money where their mouths are.
It's certainly true that the
global warming problem has meant more funding for climate science, but there's only
so much in the budget, and much of this
money has come at the expense of other fields which are no longer given priority status.
We may, after more study, find out (as Girma suggests) that there «is no risk from
global warming» or that «the risk is
so small that it is insignificant», in which case Jack Hughes is right: let's save our
money for more worthwhile endeavors rather than charging off to fight what turns out to be a paper tiger.
Imagine that, selecting data to create the story of
global warming
so you can keep getting millions of dollars in tax payer
money.
So here's the bottom line: if you want to make
money out of
global warming invest in energy efficiency and renewable energy companies.
Typically these talks don't get beyond environment ministers, but these officials don't have much to say about things like
money (which is one reason why
global warming talks are
so difficult).
NB: I would also want the actual forecast changes by 2100 to be incuded in every public climate change statement,
so the public can see how catastrophioc they middle range predictionsare, versus other
global problems, or spending the
money on defences rather than subsidising what makes things worse by law, etc..
Michaels, readers may recall, became a lightning rod for controversy last month after Charlottesville City Councilor Kevin Lynch questioned the propriety of Michaels» role as
so - called «state climatologist» while accepting industry
money and espousing an unpopular view that downplays
global warming.
«When I joined the American Physical Society sixty - seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the
money flood... the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence... How different it is now... the
money flood has become the raison d'etre of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs... It is of course, the
global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted
so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave.
The «smartest people in the world» also said Iraq had WMDs, never trust the smartest people when billions of dollars is at stake, and all that
money is flowing to these people in the form of grant
money, research grants, carbon credits, etc. and you said A. Climate Change, not A.GWwarming
so I guess
global cooling will soon be blamed on A. activity along with hurricanes and droughts.
Why on earth did we pay
so much
money for the ARGO floats, the only instrumentation actually designed for the task of measuring
global ocean temperature accurately to hundredths of a degree, if we don't use the data?
So apart from keeping all those scumbags off the streets, what are we actually getting in return for this $ 1.5 trillion of our
money which we're being forced by our governments to spend annually on this
global climate scam industry?
So now we have a herd of ignorant
global politicians wandering around the «climate science desert» without USA leadership OR USA
MONEY (MOST IMPORTANTLY, NO USA
MONEY).
So, not only does using less electricity save you
money and reduce
global warming impacts, but it also protects our precious fresh water supplies.
And even if they corrected their methods; which they can't do, because it would take all the
money on the planet to buy enough thermometers; it is all for naught, since there is no physical cause and effect connection between a local surface or near surface Temperature measurement, and the energy flows that are occurring at that location at that time;
so mean
global temperature tells us nothing about whether the earth is gaining or losing total energy.
So now a whole cruise ship full of people who believe in all of the
global warming hype are putting their
money where their mouths are and are attempting to do what many explorers in the past have perished trying to do.
I have too much respect for Allison to get into a spitting match with him over something that there is simply too little data to positively determine, too much corruption and
money involved for those who support that mankind can affect and control
global weather to any significant amount all while ignoring
so many other factors such as solar winds, Sun spot activity and even the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere, which is never a part of any of the seriously flawed climate models.
So they must convince people they know enough to know man - made global warming is real and a terrible thing, but they must convince people they don't really know enough so they need more money to do more researc
So they must convince people they know enough to know man - made
global warming is real and a terrible thing, but they must convince people they don't really know enough
so they need more money to do more researc
so they need more
money to do more research.
We're in it now and if you are
so greedy for
money that you don't care; you will experience the consequences of
global warming.
So Gray and anyone so inclined is right to follow the money, but since 80 per cent of the global and U.S. economy runs on fossil fuels, if you do some real math the trail leads directly to those who profit most from fossil fuels, not those worth one - ten thousandth or less who study their effects.&raqu
So Gray and anyone
so inclined is right to follow the money, but since 80 per cent of the global and U.S. economy runs on fossil fuels, if you do some real math the trail leads directly to those who profit most from fossil fuels, not those worth one - ten thousandth or less who study their effects.&raqu
so inclined is right to follow the
money, but since 80 per cent of the
global and U.S. economy runs on fossil fuels, if you do some real math the trail leads directly to those who profit most from fossil fuels, not those worth one - ten thousandth or less who study their effects.»
If yes, big
monies will be required to fund Monsanto
so that a new class of
global - warming pesticides can be brought to market in time to save civilization and our human species.
Besides, the whole
global warming thing is just a fraud
so scientists can get more
money for their «research».
Cultivate the good company Corporate attention to
money above all else, combined with the power and freedom of
global finance, makes it difficult to capture the wide range of social and ecological values of sustainability in private sector design — but it is happening,
so when you see it, nurture it.