Sentences with phrase «so global money»

The working group are supporting a platform of international rules for the blockchain network enabling so global money transfers over a blockchain by 2018.

Not exact matches

When we bought our first plane, air travel was considered very expensive, extremely frustrating and awfully dull; more recently, the banking sector has been held responsible for the financial crisis and global recession, so we used our reputation to instil some trust and, as Virgin Money's slogan says, «Make everyone better off.»
It sounds complicated, but so is the current world of moving money and global trade.
So the alternative is no tax at all domestically, creating a true territorial taxation system where companies can be free to bring money back to the states to use for investment here, while also reinvesting in other companies as they build their global enterprises.
Western Australia has reclaimed its position at centre stage in the money world, not because it is sucking in development capital but more so because it has become a global cash cow.
This is what I wrote about in the Financial Times yesterday: the U.S. refusal to cooperate with other countries, above all its double standard insisting that other countries must turn their foreign - exchange surpluses over to the U.S. Treasury to promote U.S. financial markets at their expense — and the demand that any country running a trade surplus with America spend the money on U.S. arms — is so abhorrent that other countries are proceeding to create an alternative global financial system of settling trade and balance - of - payments transactions without the United States.
«I am not yet finished; nor do I believe we are ever to have a perfect understanding of so complex a system as the global money machine.
After all, investors are investing their money in your project, so they have a right to know that the company is doing something to resolve a global problem.
So what happens is all the money that has been lent out, the collateral has been repledged so many times, something called rehypothecation, across the global world within the Euro / Dollar system that the issue now is a shortage of collateraSo what happens is all the money that has been lent out, the collateral has been repledged so many times, something called rehypothecation, across the global world within the Euro / Dollar system that the issue now is a shortage of collateraso many times, something called rehypothecation, across the global world within the Euro / Dollar system that the issue now is a shortage of collateral.
Fixed - income investments are unattractive, at such low interest rates, so all that «easy money» will go into stocks, says Allen Sinai, chief global economist for Decision Economics.
The Bank for International Settlements, the so - called central bank for central banks, thinks global market volatility is here to stay as policymakers unwind years of easy money and quantitative easing.
Clubs such as Chelsea were average (at best) before their money wielding saviour came galloping along, so why not transform your club into the next global super power buy throwing all your money into the transfer kitty?
How can we accept this kind of embarrassment and shame for a club who spends so much money on players with a much bigger global brand, and fans paying so much for tickets?
We always had wages structures that were respected and players earn so much money now that the cases have become much more individual than global.
with so much money in cash reserves perhaps Stan Kroenke is insisting on holding ever bigger amounts in Arsenal in order to satisfy his creditors elsewhere that he always has a large supply of cash on tap if he should need to call on it kroenke completed his Rams takeover with an acquisition of 60 % of its share capital in August 2010, less than eight months before paying # 250 million to take his shareholding in Arsenal beyond 60 % when the global financial system was in crisis
Now that we have the money and stadium almost paid (easily managed now), we are a global brand and commercially up there with the best of teams, so why are we still at the same level we are at?
Kimberly Ramsawak is the founder of Professional Jetsetter where she helps professional ambitious women travel the world more and make money while doing it, so that they can enjoy the global lifestyle they've always dreamed of without having to give up their financial security.
Sandler's comedies have made more than $ 3bn worldwide, so there is the potential for a huge amount of money to disappear from the global box office during the four - film deal.
As on other Fiestas, nothing seemed to have been thrown out to make the car lighter or cheaper in some effort to get an extra fraction of 1 mpg, so the plastics were good for the segment, and there weren't any parts that seemed like they were picked out of some global parts bin to save money.
The fund is just one manifestation of Artisan's Global Value strategy so one possible explanation is that Artisan is shifting assets around inside the $ 16 billion strategy, moving money from separate accounts into the fund.
The trend suggests the so - called» smart money,» the large managed funds that report to the CFTC, had started to back away from silver and «retail investors picked up the slack,» said Tom Pawlicki, a precious metals analyst with MF Global in Chicago.
Amazon Mechanical Turk (also known as MTurk) is a cloud platform system that brings together requesters and workers so one can make money by completing small tasks known as HITS and the other can have their work done by a global workforce in a fast and convenient manner.
Money flowing into Canadian - listed ETFs shows a growing preference for international equities over domestic stocks which have generally struggled to perform on par with their global counterparts so far this year.
So because, as Editor - In - Chief Matt Stabile relentlessly reminds us, time is money, here is the quick and dirty, abbreviated lowdown on global cities where you can return to the homestead with a semi-fat wallet.
If, for example, Big CO2 Inc. wanted to put a billion dollars down on global cooling, 2 things would happen — the web would be full of «sign up and take some money from Big CO2 Inc.» emails, and, more importantly, some of the people who think it's a slam dunk for global warming might temper their predictions just a bit because some clown put so much money down on the opposite outcome.
As I watched one document of global warming, in it one business succesed man was interviewed, he said that he get many thing, money, house, and car and so on, this is important, envrionmental problem is the last thing.
As a disclaimer, I will confess that these changes are not due to the magnanimity of the consumers who want to alleviate the potentially devastating effects of Global Warming, but instead are primarily due to the fact that people don't want to spend so much money on gas (and they use the Global Warming argument as a backup to assuage their conscience)
Different topic: we need some type of clearinghouse to announce when prominent or semi-prominent people deny global warming, so people like me will know to ask them if they'll put their money where their mouths are.
It's certainly true that the global warming problem has meant more funding for climate science, but there's only so much in the budget, and much of this money has come at the expense of other fields which are no longer given priority status.
We may, after more study, find out (as Girma suggests) that there «is no risk from global warming» or that «the risk is so small that it is insignificant», in which case Jack Hughes is right: let's save our money for more worthwhile endeavors rather than charging off to fight what turns out to be a paper tiger.
Imagine that, selecting data to create the story of global warming so you can keep getting millions of dollars in tax payer money.
So here's the bottom line: if you want to make money out of global warming invest in energy efficiency and renewable energy companies.
Typically these talks don't get beyond environment ministers, but these officials don't have much to say about things like money (which is one reason why global warming talks are so difficult).
NB: I would also want the actual forecast changes by 2100 to be incuded in every public climate change statement, so the public can see how catastrophioc they middle range predictionsare, versus other global problems, or spending the money on defences rather than subsidising what makes things worse by law, etc..
Michaels, readers may recall, became a lightning rod for controversy last month after Charlottesville City Councilor Kevin Lynch questioned the propriety of Michaels» role as so - called «state climatologist» while accepting industry money and espousing an unpopular view that downplays global warming.
«When I joined the American Physical Society sixty - seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood... the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence... How different it is now... the money flood has become the raison d'etre of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs... It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave.
The «smartest people in the world» also said Iraq had WMDs, never trust the smartest people when billions of dollars is at stake, and all that money is flowing to these people in the form of grant money, research grants, carbon credits, etc. and you said A. Climate Change, not A.GWwarming so I guess global cooling will soon be blamed on A. activity along with hurricanes and droughts.
Why on earth did we pay so much money for the ARGO floats, the only instrumentation actually designed for the task of measuring global ocean temperature accurately to hundredths of a degree, if we don't use the data?
So apart from keeping all those scumbags off the streets, what are we actually getting in return for this $ 1.5 trillion of our money which we're being forced by our governments to spend annually on this global climate scam industry?
So now we have a herd of ignorant global politicians wandering around the «climate science desert» without USA leadership OR USA MONEY (MOST IMPORTANTLY, NO USA MONEY).
So, not only does using less electricity save you money and reduce global warming impacts, but it also protects our precious fresh water supplies.
And even if they corrected their methods; which they can't do, because it would take all the money on the planet to buy enough thermometers; it is all for naught, since there is no physical cause and effect connection between a local surface or near surface Temperature measurement, and the energy flows that are occurring at that location at that time; so mean global temperature tells us nothing about whether the earth is gaining or losing total energy.
So now a whole cruise ship full of people who believe in all of the global warming hype are putting their money where their mouths are and are attempting to do what many explorers in the past have perished trying to do.
I have too much respect for Allison to get into a spitting match with him over something that there is simply too little data to positively determine, too much corruption and money involved for those who support that mankind can affect and control global weather to any significant amount all while ignoring so many other factors such as solar winds, Sun spot activity and even the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere, which is never a part of any of the seriously flawed climate models.
So they must convince people they know enough to know man - made global warming is real and a terrible thing, but they must convince people they don't really know enough so they need more money to do more researcSo they must convince people they know enough to know man - made global warming is real and a terrible thing, but they must convince people they don't really know enough so they need more money to do more researcso they need more money to do more research.
We're in it now and if you are so greedy for money that you don't care; you will experience the consequences of global warming.
So Gray and anyone so inclined is right to follow the money, but since 80 per cent of the global and U.S. economy runs on fossil fuels, if you do some real math the trail leads directly to those who profit most from fossil fuels, not those worth one - ten thousandth or less who study their effects.&raquSo Gray and anyone so inclined is right to follow the money, but since 80 per cent of the global and U.S. economy runs on fossil fuels, if you do some real math the trail leads directly to those who profit most from fossil fuels, not those worth one - ten thousandth or less who study their effects.&raquso inclined is right to follow the money, but since 80 per cent of the global and U.S. economy runs on fossil fuels, if you do some real math the trail leads directly to those who profit most from fossil fuels, not those worth one - ten thousandth or less who study their effects.»
If yes, big monies will be required to fund Monsanto so that a new class of global - warming pesticides can be brought to market in time to save civilization and our human species.
Besides, the whole global warming thing is just a fraud so scientists can get more money for their «research».
Cultivate the good company Corporate attention to money above all else, combined with the power and freedom of global finance, makes it difficult to capture the wide range of social and ecological values of sustainability in private sector design — but it is happening, so when you see it, nurture it.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z