Sentences with phrase «so higher dividend growth»

Not exact matches

The disadvantage is that since the dividend growth rate already takes into account company growth and share repurchases, the growth rate will be fairly high, so we'll have to use a fairly high discount rate, and so it's very sensitive to the inputs.

I wouldn't focus so much on the low current yield of these companies as much as their very high dividend growth rates.

These nearly zero interest rates is what drove many U.S. and European fixed income investors towards higher income opportunities in their own home countries — so, they bought more equities, REITs and dividend growth stocks over the last 5 years, driving up valuations (though the February correction has brought back some sanity.)

What's often forgotten is that one usually comes at the expense of the other: bonds with higher coupons can bring a capital loss, stocks with higher dividends may experience slower growth, and so on.

Dividend growth investing is largely about buying and holding high quality companies, so I exercise great care in deciding what to buy.

The ten - year dividend growth rate stands at 10.9 %, so you're getting a very high DGR on a very high yield.

I started off by investing in stocks with higher yields so as to get the snowball rolling a bit, but have opened up my portfolio to a few stocks with fairly low entry yields, but higher growth rates, which could propel my dividend income many decades from now.

So been buying lower yielding, higher dividend growth stocks.

That is to say, I'll likely invest a few hundred dollars or so in high - quality dividend growth stocks trading at attractive valuations.

The reason I've gone public with many of my real - life, real - money «10 % Trades» is so you can see for yourself how entirely possible it is to boost your annualized yield on high - quality dividend growth stocks.

So called high dividend stocks are usually from companies that have stable cash flows but relatively little or moderate growth potential.

For any given earnings $ $, the higher the dividend yield, the lower the necessary growth for a valid investment, so the higher the acceptable PEG.

The reason I've gone public with many of my real - life, real - money «High - Yield Trades» is so you can see for yourself how entirely possible it is to boost your annualized yield on high - quality dividend growth stoHigh - Yield Trades» is so you can see for yourself how entirely possible it is to boost your annualized yield on high - quality dividend growth stohigh - quality dividend growth stocks.

So AT&T falls neatly into a certain category of dividend growth stock: high yield, slow growth.

They identify the point where the lines of the two choices cross and conclude something like «Over 20 years you receive more $ $ from high dividend - growth stocks than from high - yield dividend stocks, so it is better to buy high dividend - growth stocks.»

Think of it like this: If you have $ 30,000 in a tax - free account with dividends reinvested, you can put yourself in the position to have 8.5 % annual growth plus 1.5 % returns coming from dividend reinvestment, so you could realistically compound your money at 10 % annually over that time frame, due to the nature of high - quality cash generating businesses mixed with long periods of time and tax - favored holding structures.

In short, you want to put your money to work for you in high - quality dividend growth stocks for their safety and growing dividend stream... but their current yields are so suppressed today that you'd potentially have to wait a whole decade before being able to capture a double - digit yield - on - cost.

So Starbucks» higher growth does eventually win out in both dividends per year (Year 10) and cumulative dividends (Year 15).

Dividend Growth Investing is a great strategy if you have the capital and / or sufficient time (10 + years), but I have neither so high yielding ETF / CEF stocks were the best way for me.

And so the money I was saving all these years was being invested in high - quality dividend growth stocks (which I'll go over in the next chapter).

In general, although volatility can change on any asset (i.e., TLT is a good example), fixed income assets are less risky than higher - yielding income; large cap dividend stocks are not as risky / volatile as large cap growth or small caps, which are not as risky as foreign and emerging equity and so forth.

I am picking up more traditional dividend growth positions in my regular accounts, so leveraging the higher valued and higher growth positions in Loyal3 is a great complement to that.

So by buying a high quality dividend paying company, the return was 7.9 % from dividends, and 33.4 % from the growth of the business.

for you would a stock like duke energy (DUK) not be attractive to you because of its payout % being so high 116 % even thou it is a very stable growth company 10 years dividend growth!