Sentences with phrase «so if none»

Blogging coberetly (ha, yes, that is how I spelled it — drug induced typo, of course) on oxycodone is a bit difficult if not downright impossible, so if none of this makes sense, it will soon enough.

There are of course many more apps out there such as the Sony app, Cool Reader and FBReader so if none of the above are the ones for you there are plenty of other options.

There are 13 more colors available so if none of these caught your eye one of them might.

Not exact matches

Which is why, I guess, renting is so appealing: all the fun, none of the hassle — and Hagerty's roadside assistance plan if anything goes wrong.

There are hundreds of loan forgiveness programs out there, so don't stop searching if none of the above programs apply to you.

This applies to game theory in the group thought that establishes the commonality, «If I have a black - hat link profile and my competitor has a black - hat link profile, we can only all go down in flames, so likely none of us will».

If so, replace general examples with industry - specific ones to illustrate your points in a more targeted way (or add these examples where there are none).

So, if you have actually read a bible and have a better argument for me than «I want proof» (because there is none, it's a religious BELIEF) or that Christians judge people or hate people (because as a TRUE Christian you must not judge & you must love thy neighbor) then I'm all for it!

So basically, if you make a bunch of claims, and some of them are shown to be false while none have been shown to be true, you're record isn't very encouraging and your reasoning process is highly suspect.

M. Goodswell: «If you want there to be something more than there is - so be it... but don't try to tell me for one second that any of the churches today are straight up... none of them are... they are all based on a false foundation... its all BS....

If the story of Jonah should not be a fact, even if Jonah had never lived, still would the profound truth of this narrative, the love of God for Nineveh and the so - called heathen, be none the less precious in the eyes of all those who love their fellow meIf the story of Jonah should not be a fact, even if Jonah had never lived, still would the profound truth of this narrative, the love of God for Nineveh and the so - called heathen, be none the less precious in the eyes of all those who love their fellow meif Jonah had never lived, still would the profound truth of this narrative, the love of God for Nineveh and the so - called heathen, be none the less precious in the eyes of all those who love their fellow men.

I'm writing at the tail end of many comments, none of which I've read, so apologies if it's been said..

We know, none so well, how stained is our national record; we know with what envious eyes our own business and military and political Ahabs regard the inheritance of Third World Naboths and take it, if necessary after bearing false witness against Naboth.

If God really is violent, but Jesus revealed none of this violence, then the real lie is Jesus hiding this side of God from us so that He appeared more loving and gracious than He truly is.

You do a real lot of insulting lorraine — btw — your god does not exist so none of your religious rant sapply to me, and would not even if your god did exists., that is the simple and exact truth.

He wouldn't have looked too bad going in if none of his bones had been broken, so why would he look particularly bad coming out?

Pascal's Wager is putting all the «Eggs» in one «Basket», aka the christian god, so you are taking just as big a gamble, if not a bigger one, in believing in one of the many possibilities, instead of all or none of the

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

None of us think you look like Jesus, so if you plan to wear the name, then be who you say you are.

Then you truly do not understand the true nature of God... He saw that none of us would be good enough to attain heaven (except little children who die at an early age) so He sent the only One who had never sinned, who even though he sweated blood and asked if there was any other way, but ultimately said,» not my will but Yours,» paid our way into Heaven.

So if Jesus is who He claims to be, none of the other religions can be true.

There is a lot of repetition in the social documents of the magisterium, partly because there seems to be an unwritten assumption on the part of later popes, a slightly odd one if you ask me, that none of their readers has bothered or will bother to read the earlier stuff, so each pope needs to spend a lot of time summarizing everything that came before.

And even if someone should, even if he succeeded in enumerating them all and for an instant succeeded in holding them together so that they could not, like true runaways, slip away and assume another role while remaining in essence the same, still one evasion would always remain behind even if none ought to be there, even if by repeated inspection a commendable cleverness should be unable to discover that a single ground had been overlooked and hence that a single evasion was still possible.

If not why are there so many trying to stop gay people from getting married and none to try and ban any of the other sins mentioned in the bible?

If a god effected any sort of change in our universe, there would be evidence, and so far, there is none.

It's a perversion to you lorraine so do nt do it - = other people have different yet equal morals — its none of your your business if people are rghteously gay.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

If that is irrelevant you need a new dictionary You said» We know that christianity is in fact a myth» - Sorry you have no proof and I will offer none, so yours is just an antagonistic statement from 8 % of the population.

There is none, so accept that and don't try to dishonestly frame everything you say as if it were fact.

Cheesemaker If you will be so kind list the nones.

If Obama would stop being so stubborn, and let these religious groups provide insurance in accordance with their beliefs, none of this would've happened, but no he's got ta be dictating to everyone that we must have insurance and it must include certain things.

Or perhaps if the leader is powerless at the point when none of their followers feel a sense of community so their «correspondence» loses its luster with the individual rather than when the idea or virtue is truly out of date?

Those are not beliefs — not in the biblical sense of the term «belief» — or if they are a form of belief they are disconnected from any relevance to you and I. None of these «so called» beliefs affect much of what you do with your life — knowing about a virgin birth won't give you the tools to be a better parent — these «beliefs» do not function like that — they are more suppositions about the character of God.

So if people give money to the church, none of it goes to Joel — sorry to disappoint you.

Hi Heidi, from what I can tell none of the people who have made this egg - free have used guar or xanthan — I never use either as I hate the gummyness so I can't advise on amounts if you were to use.

None of my business if it is a moral stand point, it just seems like so much of your cooking is about health and I was wondering if that is why you don't post any meat recipes.

I don't know, but for the past 8 years, hundreds if not thousands of basketball players have been eligible, and none have approached his value, this suggests that the odds of improving are sufficiently close to zero so as to rule out that scenario; ditto Kevin Durant.

As the League progresses, many teams are going to find their strengths (if they haven't done so yet), however, none will have what these guys have in TWTW (that's the will to win) department.

and would add if the same management structure hadn't lied to fans about how all this would allow us to compete with top teams in Europe with... with exception of PSG... are not driven by oil wealth or megalomanic owners... of course none of this has anything to do with the footballing errors consistently made by wenger and which if corrected would at least give us a BETTER shot at winning top trophies than has been the case over the last dozen or so years

BFG has not been up to it so far this season, addition to our defense was promised in the summer but not delivered, according to Wenger «He looked but none was available», fast forward to AGM and Wenger says «we will purchase a defender in January», well if we couldn't find a defender in the summer will that defender miraculously become available in January when 1) his cost will be twice as expensive 2) could be cup tied and 3) with clubs fighting relegation or fighting for the title.

The Florida State coaching staff had so little faith that All - America running back Lorenzo Booker of St. Bonaventure High in Ventura, Calif., would choose the Seminoles over Notre Dame that none of them stayed in the office on Feb. 6 to wait and see if Booker faxed his letter of intent to Tallahassee.

Dream summer: no injuries; get rid of a few players not in the picture; trade Szczesny for Lloris or Cech; find a talented young CB (none of the ones we are linked to excite me much except Howedes and Varane, and I don't like our odds on them — also unnecessary unless we get rid of one or Chambers isn't going to play there); Kongdobia or Schniederlin (if an offer of 35 + mil comes in for WIlshere, sell and buy BOTH); Lacazette (Dybala looks great, but he is not a great goalscorer and I believe Arsene would turn him into a winger primarily — so, I'd still get him, but not as high a priority as the rest).

He looked slow and weak, plus none of the other Seahawks receivers are good red zone threats, figures his td numbers would be inflated, so yes, if u pay him 8 or more a year your paying for a name, again no thank you

I was sure none of them are options since we have safety kinda covered but you showed a different light of how picking them may take our D a step further so if one of them happens to fall to us I will be pleased.

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

Comon none of the 3 apart from flamini can give you 10 games a season... so if elneny is not an injury wreak then we should be fine

Our 3 back is just so wrong.We don't have natural wingbacks even in this formation.It also seems to me that lots of people here believe if you're good at right or left fullback then automatically you're good at RWB / LWB which quite frankly is untrue.That's why Oxlade Chamberlain can be considered at RWB but not right back.At RWB or LWB you're asking too much in terms of attack from Bellerin and Kolasinac.A proper wing back can be viewed as a more defensive winger which quite frankly none of them are and they don't possess the flexibility too to play that way.Our midfielders are also not disciplined enough because in 3 back there's a huge gap in the centre of the field that must be covered by our CM's so indiscipline only means disaster.We also have Ozil who looks like he's playing at RW in 3 back.In that we're limiting his impact because Ozil takes on his man because he wants to not because he likes to.You can't play such players at the wing.He's a proper No. 10 who likes to be given freedom.That's why Ozil plays likes he's lazy on the ball and stuff.It's because he wants to be free and for that you need to put him at No. 10.

Arsenal have already sold Afobe and sent out Podolski, Sanogo and Campbell out on loan, so there is probably room for another striker if none of those come back, although Danny Welbeck will probably have to drop down to being third choice for the centre - forward spot.

So if he goes what are the chances that Arsenal can pick up two of the games most dangerous widemen before next season, Id say slim to none.

So what if he had kept them all there (none of them wanted to play bit parts, and he never stops a player who wants to leave).