Sentences with phrase «so less risk»

However, a 15 - year term is priced better than a 20 or 30 - year option since the duration is shorter, so less risk for the carrier.

the larger ones) actually have to Ireland, so less risk than one might think.

If he's over 59.5 years old then the 10 % early withdrawal penalty doesn't apply, so less risk in that situation.

So the lesser risk you take, the better.

Not exact matches

«The Swedish crown is also being held back by less risk appetite following last week's equity rout, so people are cautious.»

It might seem encouraging to applaud your child's intelligence, but tons of research — much of it spearheaded by Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck — shows that doing so makes kids fearful of taking risks or pursuing tough goals that might make them feel less than brilliant at first.

Failure to do so not only puts the company at risk, but also reduces the chance of actually closing on an investment (desperate companies are far less appealing).

The bigger companies are also more stable and have a long track record with device makers, so there's less risk that they will lose business.

The interview was already scheduled, so I risked sending it, feeling I was risking the opportunity, but less than not sending it after they asked three times.

So far, researchers point only to a correlative relationship between coffee and less risk of heart trouble, not a causative one.

The lender is taking on less risk, so they will usually grant a higher credit maximum at a lower rate for secured lines.

Essentially our offer is that we handle the production & distribution and then share revenue with the people who help create the works for a period of time (12 months) in exchange for their work at half pay — As shoots only last a day or two max, there is very little risk for people to participate as it's a good deal and we already know everyone in the business so there is little downtime building any of the infrastructure or much less cold calling anyone

The way the story goes is that an extended period of calm with steady growth and no recessions, nothing to make you nervous, makes investors less risk - averse, so more risk taking, and not just investors, but their financial intermediaries.

Managing risk is so key, and is probably being ignored by many investors who have less than 10 years experience.

Currently, the VIX is trading at about 13, but the 20 - year average is just above 20 or 21, so sitting at lower - than - average levels, it means many investors have become less concerned about risk and maybe a bit too complacent.

As they have done so, credit spreads on these assets have declined, which means that investors are receiving less compensation for the risk they are taking on.

So much less interest rate risk and still get 90 % of the return of LT treasuries.

A low credit score can signify that you're less reliable as a borrower, so you might get a higher interest rate to make up for the risk.

Though I certainly wouldn't advise it as a strategy, investors would have historically outperformed the S&P 500 with much less risk than a buy - and - hold simply by selling stocks when the S&P reached 19 times earnings and staying in T - bills until the P / E reverted to 15, even if it took years to do so.

But even if so, a refresher is useful in order to help remind oneself about «how trading really works», and how long - term success is actually achieved (Hint: It has less to do with «signal generation» and much more to do with «money management and risk management»).

It doesn't help that lawyers are the most risk - averse group on the planet, so as time goes on it is less likely that you'll want to leave.

We don't believe a low growth world will be less susceptible to recession or credit strains, so we also don't believe that equity risk premiums should be razor thin.

So I think there's less downside risk here.

When adolescents have easy access to EBC, they may be more likely to engage in sexual behaviour or to take more risks when they do so, e.g. by being less likely to use condoms.

On the other hand, God must so act in the interests of both the self and all others as thereby to establish the cosmic order of natural law that sets the optimal limits of all other action, where by «optimal limits» I mean limits such that, were they to be set otherwise than they are, the ratio between opportunities for good and risks of evil would be less rather than more favorable than it in fact is.

These are less serious recalls, so they might not present the same public relations and litigation risks as Class I recalls, but they can still affect business and reputation.

There is a risk that the hot sugar will cook the seeds and so raw seeds are less likely to take on a burned taste.

By doing so, you use less equipment and don't risk losing any tomatillo flavor.

So, if you're still with me here, there's a lot less risk of adding too much salt.

With a bit more competition for French stand - outs it can only stand to push the prices one way, so with a higher investment for players in a less competitive league I guess the risk / reward is a bit more of a gamble.

Absolutely right there He won't go anywhere because he does what the board wants him to He delivers profit and very low risk and sets expectations at virtually zero so that's the fans don't expect too m7ch and he doesn't have to deliver and the board don't need to spend Its a farce and more importantly a blatant con Every single fan who puts even a penny into the club either through season tickets right the way down to buying a mug or a pen or a shirt is being robbed by a board who care NOTHING for sporting glory and even less for the fans who finance the club There SHOULD be mass walkouts on home games and protests at every turn but, there won't be because the demographic of fans now is of a majority who are not true supporters but millennial who only want to say they attend the ground every other week.

Also, Smith is considered a more technically sound player so he would be less of a risk than Flowers who was drafted on potential and need.

Honestly, am so confused... When are we going to end this striker saga??? Anyway, i think Aubameyang is a complete striker and has over the years proved to be a consistent striker am sure we wont regret it if we get him... He is a lesser risk compared to Mbappe.

Being the champions and being at home should mean that they can not just sit back and soak up our attacks, so I think we can be a bit less gung ho and take fewer risks at the back.

In Guardiola's risk assessment, the league is as good as won, so the United game has become nothing less than an irrelevant distraction in the midst of six crucial days between Wednesday's first - leg at Anfield and next Tuesday's return game at the Etihad.

One way, I believe, to address the problem of under - reporting and increase the chances a concussion will be identified early on the sports sideline may be to rely less on athletes themselves to remove themselves from games or practices by reporting concussion symptoms (which the most recent study shows occurs at a shockingly low rate, [9] or on game officials and sideline observers to observe signs of concussion and call for a concussion assessment, but to employ technology to increase the chances that a concussion will be identified by employing impact sensors designed to monitor head impact exposure in terms of the force of hits (both linear and rotational), number, location, and cumulative impact, in real time at all levels of football, and in other helmeted and non-helmeted contact and collision sports, where practical, to help identify high - risk impacts and alert medical personnel on the sideline so they can consider performing a concussion assessment.

If you feed them more variety when they are still under a year then every protein is strange and the really strange ones will not seem so strange to their system and they are at less risk for developing allergies.

Before you answer that, please remember we are talking about the risk per event, so the fact there is less drunk driving in Canada does not affect the risk.

But C - sections became safer and women started having smaller families so the risk / benefit ratio of c - section compared to forceps changed and now forceps are done much less often.

So a 3.11 x increased risk of neonatal death should be ignored for the 0.6 x less risk of PPH.

What are the markers of an NCB cult member vs someone with a DIY ethic but no medical background who believes and repeats statements like «hospitals can deal with emergencies better but emergencies are less likely to happen at home so the risk evens out»?

So if we anticipate that the babies are less than 36 weeks and potentially at risk for respiratory problems, we will usually have the ALS team there which Advance Life Support team and that usually consist of a nurse and a respiratory technician and if there's two, two babies you have to multiple everything by two.

Having a vacuum - assisted delivery increases your risk of tears in your vagina, perineum, and anal sphincter, though less so than with a forceps delivery.

We found a similar pattern with depression: still at increased risk, but so much less than if they were mixed - or formula - feeding.

So a less - than - ideal diet will probably not affect your breastfeeding child, but it may leave your body at nutritional risk.

Lecithin is for anyone, it is a poly - unsaturated fat so it helps by lowering the plaque in our blood, reducing cholesterol, and it works in breastfeeding mothers by making the breast milk less sticky so it will flow better, reducing the risk of clogged milk ducts.

So, initially a high risk mom may have a worse labor morbidity chance but in the first 24 hours - her baby would be less likely to die at home than it would in the hospital.

When a woman breastfeeds she is so efficient in energy use and nutrient uptake that her bone density increases, hence women who have breastfed have less risk of osteoporosis.

I had an amazing, healing experience and I am so thankful this option exists for low risk mamas who wish to choose the path less traveled.

If you look at the black - box warning on a packet of birth control pills, you'll notice that at most ages the risk of death from taking the pills is less than if you don't take them — that's because they're so good at preventing pregnancy, and pregnancy kills.