Sentences with phrase «so life scientists»

So that life scientists don't have to become HPC experts, researchers are reshaping genomics software.

In short, new many - core processors plus improved software can deliver faster performance and support larger databases so life scientists can keep up with the data.

Not exact matches

Phages often live in dirty places, including sewage, so scientists must first isolate and purify them.

Finnur Eiriksson, a computer scientist living in Reykjavik, said, «The exorbitant prices in the housing market, so early after the collapse of the Icelandic economy, are quite shocking.»

Interesting - so if you're against intelligent design, but you're a scientist AND believe in God, what is your view on how life began?

And unless you are a scientist who has dedicated his life to these pursuits, you really have NO bearing what so ever on modern science!

Topher So what is your opinion on a team of scientists creating a thriving, self replicating new form of life without the necessity of god?

How much of a scientist life is really spent delving into the so called wonders of evolution?

I am unaware of ANY great scientist living today who is a christian... so please name him.

He said, «I am unaware of ANY great scientist living today who is a christian... so please name him.

We all live only so many years... there is no way each of us can study all of the science we need... scientists (Complexity - Chaos - Systems) tell us that computers can not even predict the future given the known laws of physics, etc...

Some scientists have so struggled with the extreme improbability of the conditions for life resulting from randomness that they go so far as to dream up theories of parallel universes to explain the problems presented by simple math on the likelihood of random chance.

And if it's so simple, why do professional scientists spend the entire working lives investigating it?

So scientists CREATE life and you're an evolutionist?

It is completely scary and hilarious that the country I live in and the people that surround me every day are so STUPID they will just toss out all scientific studies just to believe some book and so called fake scientist that try to prove creationism.

If it's so easy to create life how come scientist haven't been able to do it in the labs from scratch.

Obviously this process of descent has not been observed, but there exists so much overwhelming evidence supporting it that most scientists (and probably all scientists in the life sciences) consider it a fact as well.

So life does not change as much as you atheist and scientist tend to preach.

I think most of the Americans are in lost... as most of them do not know who their father is and it is very unfortunate... even if they know who their father is, the mom has children from diff men outside of marriage... and while a child is being raised, watching what his / her parents do to enjoy their life... so things become normal when they grow up... like if you go back early nineteen century, women were not allowed to go to beach without being covered... and now it totally opposite... if you do not have a boyfriend or girlfriend before 15, the parents worries that their teenage has some problem... and lot more can be listed... And then you go to Church, what our children learn from there... they see in front of the Church an old man's statue with long beard standing with extending of both hand... some of the status are blank, white, Spanish and so on... so they are being taught God as an old dude... then you learn from Catholic that you pray to Jesus, Mother Marry, Saints, Death spirit and all these... the poll shows a huge number of young American turns to Atheism or believing there is no God and so on... Its hard to assume where these nations are going with the name of modernization... nothing wrong having scientists discovered the cure of aids or the pics from mars but... we should all think and learn from our previous generations and correct ourselves... also ppl are becoming so much slave of material things...

The scientist, like the doctor, has power over the life and well - being of man, and so, it is argued, the public is particularly vulnerable to his code of ethics.

When scientists announce that the chemistry of DNA is so certain, universal and uniform that all forms of life on earth are essentially the same, a credulous public jumps to the conclusion that traditional claims for the uniqueness of the human species have been nullified.

And so, if the scientists are right and the human journey is from Big Bang to Big Crunch (or whatever, for God may very well have his own ideas) we will not, as natural materialists say, have travelled from one void to another but from beginning of life to fullness of life: to borrow from T.S. Eliot,

If the process is so well understood that it leaves no room for doubt or for alternative explanations, then when was the last time the scientists were able to create artificial life, i.e. assemble a living cell out of a bunch of chemical elements?

After all god created these illnesses so therefore they must have a purpose and saving that mans life would go against the will of god but wait a tic maybe god put that scientist on this planet to stop that disease and cure that man.

Your comfortable life and gadgets that you use were all made possible by these hard working scientists so you might want to pay them some respect and try to understand the knowledge that they are trying to convey to you.

They are much smaller, dimmer and cooler than stars like our Sun, and for a long time scientists searching for life on other worlds paid little attention to them; the general feeling was that they gave out so little heat and light, compared with the Sun, that they were unlikely to host habitable planets.

These scientist, and doctors, can not remake skin, bone, eyes, brains, oval eggs, sperm, none of the sort, so they have no real answer to create a life other than how procreation works, where again what, and how is the very first man, or woman, animal, other creatures, either in the sea, or creeping on this earth was originally created from, as where did they first come from?

I suspected when I first heard this claim that the Committee on the Status of Black Americans, loaded as it was with social scientists, had demolished a straw man, a bloodless construct so rigidly defined as to be meaningless in terms of the actual lives of the humans who inhabit the nation's ghettos and who, for the most part, make up what has come to be called the underclass.

We do justice to the fact, which strikes nearly every scientist, that between so - called «lifeless» matter and primitive forms of living matter there is only a relative difference, not an absolute one.

The premise is straightforward enough: A woman's husband contracts a fatal illness from a quarantined region known as the Shimmer, so she goes in with a team of scientists to find the source of the Shimmer and save his life.

You said «simplistic life» so does that mean scientists have created this in the lab, the basic amino acids for life, they've done it?

Because isolating sign language from the home life atmosphere is so difficult, scientists are unsure as to whether sign language itself is a benefactor to early language development, or if the parents simply use a combination of engaging methods and activities to promote healthy communication.

So little can survive there that scientists have wondered whether snippets of DNA found in the soil are just part of the desiccated skeletons of long - dead microbes or traces of hunkered - down but still living colonies.

Because the lives of these ant slaves are so hopeless — they have no chance to reproduce, after all — scientists long assumed they would find no benefit in rebellion.

«Both my parents are scientists, so the attack on science, it's a little bit personal,» said Etterson, who traveled from Duluth, Minnesota, to march in D.C. «The attack that Rachel Carson was under in the 1960s... is what a lot of environmental scientists are experiencing today,» said Woolford, who lives in Arlington and this year wrote and performed a one - person show on Carson.

As far as I know, there are no TV programs about the lives of physician - scientists; most of us who chose this career path did so because we encountered and became enchanted with the idea of integrating medicine and research.

Take a look at the services offered by your own professional body or any of the larger ones — they cover all aspects relating to the life of practicing scientists, so if you have an interest in developing your subject away from the bench, they may offer some interesting career opportunities.

So say scientists at Merck, who learned from trials in 2007 that their vaccine, based on a live, weakened adenovirus carrying genes for HIV proteins, was ineffective.

Team scientists then estimate how many forms of life have yet to be discovered in each realm based on how well it has been studied and how many species have been discovered there so far.

A research team led by scientists from Brigham and Women's Hospital has developed a novel technology platform that enables the continuous and automated monitoring of so - called «organs - on - chips» — tiny devices that incorporate living cells to mimic the biology of bona fide human organs.

But even today, scientists «are fired after 5 years at the CNRS» — the French national research agency — «so the research organizations or universities won't be obliged to give them an open - ended contract, which very much complicates their lives and the lives of the laboratories,» says Guillaume Bossis, a CNRS biologist at the Institute of Molecular Genetics of Montpellier.

So although young life scientists earn only a little more than the typical American worker, their salaries increase much more steeply, and the increases persist.

And it seems likely that research in this area is only going to grow, so there should be plenty of opportunities for research scientists who fancy a taste of the Good Life.

For data about wars, there are many databases that estimate war deaths, and in recent eras, governments and social scientists have tracked just about every aspect of life, so we really can get a clear view of things like child abuse, spousal abuse, rape and so on.

«When scientists face the choice of an academic career or industry, many of those choosing industry do so because they want to make a difference that will improve people's lives,» Gregory says.

Many scientists continue to live near their university so they can use the library or visit friends.

But highly trained life scientists will still be needed for such tasks as late - stage development (ensuring smooth implementation of final phase (III and IV) clinical trials) as well as compliance with regulatory demands (so - called commissioning and validation specialists), according to Croonen.

Micheletti and his research group have been among the first to work in that respect and are an authoritative voice in the field, so much that the Physics of Life Reviews has chosen to ask the scientist himself this review.

So far the field hasn't lived up to its promise — but senior scientists and administrators in the field mostly agree that a few companies in the industry are approaching viability so the small industrial scientific workforce is likely to groSo far the field hasn't lived up to its promise — but senior scientists and administrators in the field mostly agree that a few companies in the industry are approaching viability so the small industrial scientific workforce is likely to groso the small industrial scientific workforce is likely to grow.

So if scientists find any organics on Mars, that means the planet is very, very dry — at least nowadays — which, paradoxically isn't good news for life.