Sentences with phrase «so little evidence of»

So little evidence of wrong - doing that they have to sex it up!

Since there is so much evidence of the moral decay that follows a loss of theistic conviction and so little evidence of the maintenance of civilization apart from this conviction, the burden of proof is on the person who answers Meiklejohn's question in the affirmative.

Not exact matches

So far, the gauges that economists monitor show little evidence that price increases are on the verge of accelerating.

Disproving the existence of something for which there is little evidence is not feasible, so I am content in knowing, that given our current understanding of the universe, it is highly unlikely.

We can only wonder at the credulity of all those intellectuals who staked so much on so little evidence.

I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just as in a court case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no matter how much evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit into their world view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»

My above little song and dance I wrote doesn't reflect the mounds of evidence that we have in which I would favor over god, who does not have any evidence of exisiting, so I posit that since you believe that it would make total sense that god would appear in the middle of the woods, drop a watch and then disappear and it actually being possible shows me the delusion in which you have caught yourself in.

The thing is, it is very easy to feel sure of the non-existence of a god, when there is so little evidence.

First I got him interested in some of my little conspiracy theories and «evidences» — he was already heavily indoctrinated from his parents and upbringing, so it was easy to keep bringing him along — then I got him to post here.

I would point out however... that it is you who is claiming an absolute definition for the word so, perhaps while you wait for my «exegetical evidence», you might provide a little of your own substantiating your usage of the term?

So maybe that goes along with Jeremy's description of great / little faith: It takes greater faith to believe something for which we have no physical evidence.

So far as our records of his sayings afford us evidence, he gave little if any thought to it.

It was noted there that so far there has been little empirical evidence to clarify the validity both of the criticisms and defense of the paid - time broadcasters.

Investigate the evidence yourself, there is nothing at all that truly suggests that the Big Bang happened, the only thing they have used in order to come up with the theory is that in their observances, the Universe appears to be expanding from a central point, it doesn't prove that a Big bang occurred, we know so little about the universe, that we don't even know everything about our own world, and you really believe that our science has figured out the riddle to the beginning of the Universe?

On the outgoing side of things, Wenger admitted early on that he had had to trim his heavy squad, but we have seen little evidence of that so far, with just Wojciech Szczesny the only sale of note so far, and the new Juventus keeper hasn't even been seen at the Emirates for the last two years....

From the evidence so far there is little chance of Alexis suddenly becoming the player last year that refused to be left on the bench — and wanted to play and do his best even when he was injured.

Its only natural that if you spend 4 months staring at a bunch of people from Missisippi then your going to think the first person you see from Alabama is the bell of the ball so I cant fault Condoleeza Rice for trusting the evidence she was given a little too much - a lone blemish on a otherwise pristine record of determining which organizatons pose the biggest risk to others.

In fact, there is little hard evidence to suggest that, if the pregnancy is «high - risk», a negative outcome is more likely if a home birth is attempted, so there is an argument for including «high - risk» pregnancies in this type of analysis, and this was attempted as part of this research project.

When you know that the outcome of any piece of careful policy analysis may be little more than a chip to be run across the back of a minister's fingers at the poker table, it does rather take the gloss off making sure all the evidence supporting it is just so.

Because the US is so polarized politically, there is very little chance that a Republican controlled House of Representatives would choose to impeach a Republican President even if there were overwhelming evidence that he had accepted a direct bribe from the Russian government (such as, for hypothetical example, a 19 % interest in the Russian gas company Rosneft) in return for promulgating policies favorable to the Russians, let alone confirmation of the allegations that his Presidential campaign had coordinated election strategy and tactics with the Russians.

Many lords rarely attend parliament and do not hold ministerial or party office, so there can be little evidence of their party allegiance, even if they have one.

They'd swept up hundreds of people on the say - so of Afghan warlords and then realised there was no evidence against the vast majority of them, and little prospect of credible trials.

But while Labour may be spending their time talking about aspiration there is so far very little evidence of it on the Labour benches.

And let's not forget that the National Bullying Helpline has only confirmed that it has received one or two phone calls from staff at Number 10 and there is little, if any, real evidence that the prime minister is connected to this at all, so we are largely dealing with a lack of real information.

This dearth of evidence has a number of explanations: serious lingering reactions, if they exist, occur after prolonged use, rarely after a single dose; marijuana has no known medical use, unlike LSD, so scientists have had little reason to study the drug......

So far, however, little evidence has emerged of reduced enthusiasm for pharmaceutical careers.

Other ongoing attempts: I let Baby V make a mess with her food to encourage a deeper understanding of what she's eating; every so often, I spin her around to boost her balance and coordination; and I give little massages that some researchers think might be good for her, though others point out how shoddy the evidence is.

Since so little is known about how Zika virus behaves once inside the body, researchers also searched for evidence of viral infection in the animals» organs.

The new excavations at Treblinka and Sobibór have taken on profound significance, because for many years there has been so little visible evidence of what happened at the camps.

Because of the unprecedented nature of the world Ebola epidemic, so far there is little direct evidence on the anesthetic management of EVD.

So far, there's little evidence that scientific publishers have been seriously affected: None of 22 journals or journal publishers contacted by Science has rejected a research paper solely because of libel concerns, for example.

So far, there's little evidence to show how it could induce the type of brain changes seen in people with ALS.

So far, there is little evidence to suggest this was the case — but hey, that's exactly the evidence that Curiosity is tasked with gathering over the next couple of years.

Research so far is decidedly mixed: Some studies have found that, while doing crossword puzzles may make you better at remembering the capital of Burkina Faso, there's little evidence they'll boost your performance at more general tasks, like remembering where your car is parked.

Further, the so - called evidence that humans were consuming cereal - based foods 19,000 years ago (yes I did peruse the blog you posted) does nothing to convince me to start consuming the grains of today which bear little resemblance to their old - world counterparts.

There is insufficient evidence to claim that we require some specific amount of saturated fat in our diets every day, so it makes little sense to make dietary decisions based on the fear that we are not getting enough saturated fat.

And so when it came to essential oils, when I started looking at the evidence, and started diving in a little, literally hundreds and hundreds of research studies, I was like, «There's something to this stuff.»

We have little to no clinical evidence of benefit from plant free diets [1], and plenty of evidence of benefit from ketogenic diets, so why would anyone already on a ketogenic diet willingly restrict further an already restricted diet?

Despite the fact that so many were crucified, little physical evidence of it remains.

Of course, if his films are any evidence, von Trier has been orbiting Planet Melancholia for a while now, even before his widely reported battle with clinical depression, and so it's little surprise that the main characters in Melancholia enter the stage with an existential weight on their shoulders that has little, if anything, to do with the world's imminent demise.

This doesn't mean that fan concerns are misplaced, but that, with so little tangible evidence of what the movie is or could be, it's all too vague and enigmatic at this point.

Rote or scripted, sequenced or not, loved or hated, shouldn't half a century and hundreds of studies be enough to earn DI a little respect if education is so evidence - based?

Only anecdotal evidence has been offered in support of the claim that charter schools systematically remove students with disabilities, and little rigorous research has considered the underlying causes of the difference between the percentage of charter - school students and district - school students enrolled in special education, the so - called «special education gap.»

Professor Snow then provides research evidence for the value of classroom discussion and explains why it can be so effective — and why there is too little of it in most classrooms.

Shouldn't half a century and hundreds of studies be enough to earn Direct Instruction a little respect if education is so evidence - based?

So since there is little evidence, if any, that the use of gamification returns any significant performance improvement, the fact is that there is more to lose than there is to gain with gamification.

We find little evidence of systemic improvement so far.

Harris discusses the controversies surrounding VAMs, as argued by both VAM proponents and critics, and he contends in the end that «[i] t is difficult to weigh these pros and cons... because we have so little evidence on the [formative] effects of using value - added measures on teaching and learning.»

Puzzlingly, lack of research evidence has not stimulated rigorous research (funded by the federal government or the nation's many foundations, for example) into why so little if any progress occurred and how federal money was actually used by the schools or departments of education that spent it.

It says: «the number of free schools inspected so far is still quite small and so provide little firm evidence on performance so far.»