Sentences with phrase «so much argument»

The mere fact that there is so much argument about how to measure and adjust temp readings leads me to the conclusion that in spite of all your graphs and codes you do not have a clue.Lots of money involved in trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

Actually you're partly right, in hindsight I can't believe I had so much argument with Themm as it was based on a misunderstanding of his main point, not helped by his strange way of saying it.

Abnormal Returns (McGraw Hill, 2012) is not so much an argument for a specific strategy as a catalogue of wisdom.

In the past discussion of certain religions on non-priority boards has caused so much argument, taking time and resources away from MoneySaving work, that we've had to put a stop to it.

Jen explains what colic is and why there is so much argument about what causes it and how to treat it.

as for the fall of babylon — there has been so much argument about if it's already happened — or will happen... there are arguments for where babylon was — was it in iraq?

But it's not so much an argument of how «we» as Christians chooses to structure our regular meetings or find comfort in them, it's more about the perception those meetings elicit in both believers and those outside the body.

Not exact matches

The shale revolution weakened a strong and intuitive argument in favour of the Keystone, namely that the pipeline would serve to transport much needed fuel to be used domestically in the U.S. And Prime Minister Stephen Harper's pledge to turn to China after Washington's temporary rejection of the Keystone in early 2012, hasn't amounted to much so far.

And it wasn't an argument so much as it was a scenario.

So, this argument that affirmative action somehow is causing it doesn't really seem to have much of a logical basis.

The point being if you have other sources of support you don't «need» to rely on SS so much, or at least I suspect that will be the argument put forward.

Think back at the last argument you had with so much at stake.

I eat so much A&W I could make the same argument for buying them as you made for buying utilities.

So it's not only longer than the bonds we were issuing then but the argument, «well, it's not really that much longer than this bond is,» is perhaps that extrapolation that makes me a little bit nervous, that there is too much complacency.

It could cause consumers to purchase fewer animal products, and it might do so much more quickly than using moral arguments to persuade consumers to stop eating meat, dairy, and eggs.

What Hitchens wrote about the evils of religion was not so much a scholarly argument, but more a wave of righteous indignation that levelled everything in its path.

So much for THAT argument.

Without any evidence for, or even so much as a rational argument in support of your god, or any other god for that matter, believing they exist is patently moronic.

This is much like the argument for the Christian Trinity, it is true because god says so in the bible and the bible is true because god says so.

It's embarrassing that so many Americans, people who say they believe in freedom and equality, have spent so much time and energy trying to justify being anti gay marriage - with false arguments from the Bible (as thought that should be the only source of their decisions).

When I suggested that he was grievously mistaken, he responded, as he had to Woodward's doubts about his stance on abortion, not so much by refuting the argument as by rebuffing the individual who had the gall to question his wisdom.

My argument wouldn't be that I am offended so much... but that the oath becomes meaningless when it must be attached to bearded father figure sky god that will punish me for breaking the oath.

It's too much to reiterate in the limited space we have left, so I urge you to pick up God and the Gay Christian for the full argument.

Archie Bunker, in fierce argument with his agnostic son - in - law, is asked, «Archie, if there's a God, why is there so much suffering in the world?»

Having being on the receiving end of the «man - hater» comment more times than I can count, seeing it listed as number one — in the form of «I like white males so much I married one» — rubbed me the wrong way.Being called a man - hater is often unfairly used as a way to silence women and dismiss their arguments outright, which is troubling, especially when it happens in the midst of a theological discussion.

It was the hard numbers that had given the arguments of Losing Ground so much authority when they were first published.

So much for Gopnik's argument that Chesterton's «national spirit» and «extreme localism» led him to his supposed anti-Semitism: they were, in fact, precisely what gave him his respect for other nations and other cultures, including that of the Jews, to which the world owed its knowledge of God, «as narrow as the universe».

My question was aimed for the majority of peope that also disagree with you as much as me and cling to their faith so violently that if someone even broaches the subject, they immediatly lash out and try to either convert the unbeliever, condem him, or bring up the inane, breathtakingly stupid argument of «I can't prove there is a god, but you can't prove there isn't so we're at an impass» — I think that argument is probably the most frustrating thing EVER

Yet there is not so much as a paragraph on this urgent issue in Wiebe's argument.

I just can't stop laughing at how much the Russ», the new - man's, the devin's, the kermits, the Rainer's, etc., etc., on this blog are so desperate to be in control and demand that the Doris» stay on the «current» argument since they can't handle anything that deviates outside their talking points.

(11) The real argument, however, was not so much with tradition as with a church which used tradition authoritatively.

The argument that is being debated now falls, in terms of some of its aspects (not cohabitation in general so much as male homosexual couples specifically), within limits that are held to be inviolable.

(Although there is a large segment of Christianity that believes God literally dictated the Bible, so my argument doesn't hold much weight with them) This is the journey, this is the constant search, is it not?

«If you leave your wild beliefs out of your argument, you'll have a much better chance of making a point that is logical to anyone other than you» -------- So why didn't you give that advice to Doc when he insinuated that God is anthropocentric?

So much for Kant's argument on that subject.

There is an argument for cutting back America's collective security arrangements, but if you are going to cut them back so suddenly, you probably shouldn't be cutting the military very much or at all.

«39 Since few people read Lowe's entire 1949 article in which the details of his argument are really presented, I will select a few of the key contrasts Lowe reprinted in Understanding Whitehead, which contains an abridgement of the 1949 article, in an effort to show that Gunter has really answered them already rendering Whitehead not so much Bergson's mathematical alter ego, 40 as something more approaching his philosophical blood brother 41 According to Lowe, however, «it is fatal to the understanding of Whitehead's constructive metaphysical effort to define it in Bergsonian terms.

If the argument lacked convincing power, there would be no need to give so much attention to it.

This is not so much a criticism of these writers as an indication of the influence of Lowe's argument on Whitehead scholarship — all four of these authors do refer to Lowe.

To recall, my criticisms were based not so much on the substance of Dr. Podles» psychological or anthropological research but on the use of that research for the rest of his argument.

So much for your argument.

Here's my latest list — this seems like a good spot to set this down, as nobody's posting much on this thread... ---- bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to post that wonderful argument: Many, if not most are buried within other words, but I am not shooting for the perfect list, so use your imagination and add any words I have missed as a comment (no one has done this yet)-- I found some but forgot to write them down.

Much of McHenry's argument takes the form of showing that the doctrine of internal relations or prehensions, so important to Science and the Modern World, does not make sense apart from experience.

And if you want to talk about a child argument, if you distrust CNN so much, why are you even wasting your time posting anything on here?

Since much prehensive unification is not so characterized, it would take more argument than Ford offers to justify this conclusion.

Why wrestle with the substance of their argument when it's so much easier to just sigh about «kids these days» and be done with it?

There's so much more to be said, from various different angles: the experience of the Bible coming alive, intellectual arguments, historical arguments and so on.

In my review I was not referring so much to his concession (quoted by Mr. Ghelardi) that if God does not exist then natural selection is our best available candidate for how complex forms came to be» although that quote certainly is as good an indication as any of my contention that the design argument will only end up becoming a breeding ground for atheism, a fetid terrarium for a whole new brood of Richard Dawkinses (not a pleasant thought, that).

The fallacy in this argument stems from two hidden premises which have become so much part and parcel of Christian tradition that they are usually assumed at the outset, and remain unexamined even by those who are, in other ways, trying to examine the Gospel evidence on historical grounds.

Some atheists make moral arguments against faith (how can God allow so much suffering?)