Sentences with phrase «so much regarding»

The one thing that doesn't seem to bother me so much regarding holiday spending is my own goofy souvenir choices.

Both Dior and YSL had great fashion minds and came up with so much regarding fashion, so lovely that their inventions are strong going today!

I can relate to you so much regarding your upbringing.

As a result, you take care of your health so much regarding foods, light and frequent exercises and of course, basic knowledge relevant to the pregnancy.

Not so much regarding the results, but in terms of the consequences those results brought.

Thanks so much regarding the mention.

Not exact matches

Michael Jordan, a machine learning expert and computer science professor at University of California, Berkeley, said there is «way too much hype» regarding the capabilities of so - called chat bots.

Even so, much remains open to interpretation, but Sessions made it clear that he is not ruling out prosecuting people who violate federal law, even if they are in compliance with their state's laws in regard to medical marijuana.

So I don't regard this as much in the way of breaking news.

My gut sense tells me that if we broaden the framework that we're thinking about with regards to risk, that women are very well suited to managing some of these other risks that we don't think so much about.»

Paul Donovan, senior economist at UBS, said in a podcast: «While Cyprus might be characterised as a special case, there have been so many special cases across the euro that political reassurances in this regard will not have much worth.

But at the same time that's all secondarily affecting the millennial generation as well so there's not much discussion in that regard, you know how repressed interest rates have negatively affected the millennial generation.

Types of Moral Argumentation Regarding Homosexuality by Pim Pronk Eerdmans, 350 pages, $ 24.99 paper An interesting book not so much for the position it advances (approval of homosexual relations) as for the claim that any position on homosexuality (or anything else) must be reached on the basis of moral reflection independent of nature, science, or theology.

For so much supposedly written regarding Jesus and nothing about his wife or no wife etc etc etc..

The media of course did its usual best in stoking up and reporting much of the furore and ire; and it did so with scant regard for what the Pope actually said.

The emergent individual, regarded as of intrinsic worth and pos - sibility, was a conception which did not so much solve problems as raise them.

Also, dealing with women would be so much easier, as they are regarded as chattal.

For there is much religious literature that is not regarded as sacred; and a great deal of the content of so - called sacred literature is not necessarily directly religious at all, though indirectly it is usually in some way linked up with religion.

So there is much to be worried about, especially with regard to the continuing pressures the Church faces to conform to the perceived wisdom about how to respond to problems such as early sexual activity, teenage pregnancy and STIs.

For life within the Catholic Church, the stumbling - block as regards change in the Church's doctrine is not so much the question of defined dogmas as other doctrines of the Church in dogmatic and moral theology which are taught authoritatively but which in principle can not count as defined doctrines of faith or as irreformable dogma.

It has long been recognized that man has so much in common with the animals that he must be regarded as an animal, even if of a very special kind.

Verse 28, therefore, with which we are particularly concerned, must be regarded as having existed as an isolated logion before it was inserted into its present context, and since, as we have seen, the probability is that the Lukan version is nearer to the original form, we must, in fact, regard the saying as having so existed in very much the form it now has in Luke 11.20.

GOD has blessed me so much in the last couple of weeks regarding my home, friends, family and my most recent date.

Events that are usually regarded as serious don't seem to matter so much when they are presented casually.

I don't understand why there is so much discussion regarding the Bible and what Obama believes or doesn't believe, there is no mention of his opponent's complete disregard of the King James Bible.

The unity of any finite particular is regarded as a share in unity — so much unity, so to speak, as is consistent with being the unity of that particular manifold it is asymmetrically identical with.

Now although I am much more inclined than Sherburne to attribute unconscious experience to the dominant occasion, I hesitate to regard its unconscious as so well informed as this.

A genuine philosophy of history regarding the beginning8 of genuinely human history, and a genuine theology of the experience of man's own existence as a fallen one which can not have been so «in the beginning», would show that where it is a question of the history of the spirit, the pure beginning in reality already possesses in its dawn - like innocence and simplicity, what is to ensue from it, and that consequently the theological picture of man in the beginning as it was traditionally painted and as it in part belongs to the Church's dogma, expresses much more reality and truth than a superficial person might at first admit.

I do remember clearly coming across a sixth - century homily which said that we ought to go easy on one another, and not judge one another, because God regards us so much more mercifully than we regard one another, and more mercifully than we regard ourselves.

Seaver denies that Wallington can be regarded as a typical Puritan artisan (the fact that he wrote so much was itself unusual), but he presents enough material in addition to that of Wallington — from Puritan sermons and other autobiographies — that the reader is likely to come away feeling that he or she has learned something about Puritans in general.

They are surrogates, which is a way of saying that they are agencies by which God works; they are not substitutes, although much of the time, in our foolishness and defection, we regard them as such — and in so regarding them bring about a state of affairs which is disproportionate and destructive.

Paul knew very few sayings of Jesus and did not have a kind of religiosity, much less a theology, built on Jesus» sayings; he even argues that knowing Jesus according to the flesh, the earthly Jesus, is not really necessary (2 Cor.5: 16), so as to argue that he is in no regard less qualified than Jesus» own disciples.

So, it's no wonder that polls haven't changed much over the past 30 years regarding belief in creation.

Disagree with the other person if you want to, but recognize that they are trying to understand and explain the text just as much as you are, and that just as you want them to listen to how you arrived at your conclusions regarding the text (and don't say, «I just read the Bible,» because you didn't), so also, that other person likely engaged in deep study of the biblical text to arrive at their understanding and it would benefit you to hear how they came to their understanding.

Wow, there obviously is SO MUCH confusion, misinformation, fear and confusion regarding this issue among Christians.

Some Jewish thinkers became so Hellenised that they came to regard the heavenly bliss of a spiritual soul as a much more worthy expression of human destiny than the thought of an endless life in a material body.

The body was sometimes regarded as a prison - house of the soul, so that death could even be welcomed for the much needed relief that it brought to the soul.

It was already present in Jewish thought and it continued to play a prominent part in Christian thought, so much so that martyrdom came to be regarded as the quickest and surest way to the heavenly realm.4

I don't think a congregation needs an airtight «united front» regarding what their leaders (and their leader's partners) believe so much as they way in which they believe.

One answer is that, while considered by themselves a separate religion, they are not so regarded by many scholars, and as a mere part of Hinduism, their writings are overshadowed by the much more important writings of that mother faith.

The Acts account of the primitive preaching (at least as regards the lordship of Jesus) is not so much a theological interpretation of Jesus as the affirmation of what the early church had found him to be.

Did he mean that God actually demands so much of us, or did he mean only that God asks a reasonable regard for others, the extreme form of the statement being merely rhetorical?

There is perhaps no really debatable question in the life of Jesus in which Christian theology and piety are likely to feel they have so much at sake as in this question of how Jesus regarded himself.

He can do so because the twenty - one sayings are selected from a much greater number, and no doubt were selected because they were compatible with elements in the gospel tradition which Jeremias regards as authentic.

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law.

«Doc Loren Marks found much of the studies by the APA were convenience samples and can not draw a conclusion in regards to gay parenting and the Mark Regenerus study while some said was flawed is not so flawed after all.

It is not surprising that our culture, which regards individual choice as inviolable, would find so much merit in a book like Final Exit.

Regarding the genocide, holocaust, murder, etc. you must be asking how could God be so loving yet allow so much evil to take place in the world.

I know I am repeating much of what I wrote but I feel that like learning to play any musical instrument one needs to practice, so, my repeating is a needed measure for one and all to come to terms regarding the terminologies vented.

These days, the ability to talk about politics in a knowing way is treated as a mark of sophistication, so much so, I think, that we've come tacitly to regard political analysis as the rightful domain of intelligence.