Sentences with phrase «so much science»

Then there's this juicy bit of «communication»: ``... it suffices to say that the climate scientists have little doubt about the human impact on the climate...» Of course, like so much science non-communication, this is followed up by some vague qualifying about extent etc so you don't really know if the first bit is a sly consensus message or just a truism.

Forget the models, they leave out so much science that they are nothing more than curve fitting routines tweaked to death in order to predict the past.

«Charborn was kind of a dream Eco-E project, because it blended so much science with the entrepreneurial aspect of the project,» said Eco-E program manager, Emily Cotter.

To any rationale person, Mann's work seems not so much science as opinion.

Climatology covers so much science that it's difficult for me to grasp how anyone can coordinte the information — thermodynamics, meterology, fluid dynamics, physics, chemistry, radiation, geology, etc. ad nauseum.

You it seems not so much science as blogospheric echo chambers.

Can anyone expect to overturn so much science on the basis of five or six data points?

The REAL problem isn't so much science communication... as the fact that we have this 60 vote supermajority extra-constitutional «requirement.»

It would be cool in animation, though, with the 17 - yr lead point dancing around the long term trend line, dragging its streaming tail along behind in blurring definition of some weird confidence interval... not so much science, but fun to watch.

I was fortunate; when I was a kid, it was cool to be an astronaut, which requires so much science.

You are right on and there is so much science behind what you say that to teach otherwise shows a lack of education.

Why is so much science fiction pessimistic?

Some researchers doubt whether such a small, central organization can judge so much science.

According to director of Sports Nutrition at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center for Sports Medicine, Leslie Bonci, MPH, RD, CSSD, LDN, who has incorporated tart cherries into the training menu of both her professional athletes and active clients as a natural and easy way to manage pain that also tastes great, «Why not eat red when there's so much science to support the anti-inflammatory benefits of this Super Fruit?

Including that last happened in Haiti or Ja - p - an... and that could be a genuine possibility with so much science and developed weapons...!!?

But now that we have so much science and so many conflicting hypotheses and so many conflicting religions, we've got to be much more sophisticated.

With so much science attesting to the enormous gap in effectiveness between email and face - to - face requests, why do so many people persist in opting for email?

The writers of FOX's Fringe needed so much science assistance that The Exchange set up their own dedicated rapid response team.

Not exact matches

From pollution to injuries, the pull - tab from aluminum beverage cans were hazardous, enough so that it caused much discussion in the science community, beverage industry and media.

According to a recent article by Stanford's Emma Seppälä for the Greater Good Science Center, «one of the most extensive studies on charisma found that charisma is not so much a gift as a learnable skill.»

Michael Jordan, a machine learning expert and computer science professor at University of California, Berkeley, said there is «way too much hype» regarding the capabilities of so - called chat bots.

So thinking of a particular shift within the system as «anti-capitalist» makes about as much sense as thinking that the discrediting of a particular scientist or the fall of a particular scientific theory amounts to the downfall of science, as a whole.

«At a small company,» she says, «it's so much more about the science, and that's so much more satisfying to me.»

Long - term portfolio allocation science dictates only a small percentage of assets in cash, so as much as 90 percent to 95 percent of most portfolios are subject to huge short - term losses.

Partly because you've been spending so much time extrapolating, you now have to go back to the science.

Klemp believed in the science so much that he convinced investors to come on board for further research, including a repeat of all previous testing.

This is the first, in what will become a regular feature here on TheCloseShave.com, of low cost razor that I will be reviewing — not so much for the sake of science, but curiosity.

There is so much new science emerging around health and human longevity, and what companies and individuals are doing with it is unbelievable.

However much time they have — and in my opinion they are unlikely to have much more than 2 - 3 years in which to get credit growth under control, but there is no science to this so I can not know for sure — as Beijing moves forward in its struggle to rebalance the Chinese economy, we should keep three things in mind:

Rona and I talk about the science of gratitude, and why consciously practicing gratitude can boost our happiness so much.

There is so much bad science here, that any advocate of science should decry this article as the poorest of poor.

Unfortunately people like him give most of us Christians a bad name since he pretty much ignores science and tries to argue the earth is so young.

Hopefully science can figure that out but I am not going to hold my breath... it is hard to know who to believe with so much conflicting bias research.

«Creation» seems to magically conform to whatever seems closest to it, not so much in mainstream science, but anything some reputable scientist might have said that might serve to give the idea a bit of cover.

Types of Moral Argumentation Regarding Homosexuality by Pim Pronk Eerdmans, 350 pages, $ 24.99 paper An interesting book not so much for the position it advances (approval of homosexual relations) as for the claim that any position on homosexuality (or anything else) must be reached on the basis of moral reflection independent of nature, science, or theology.

«Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.»

Like all science, of course, it is falsifiable — but no one has ever proven it wrong, and no one has ever come up with a better theory that explains so much of the natural world using one simple concept, testable using logic and experiment.

no matter how much it may seem to make sense, many many peices are missing and as far as im concerned, science usually changes its mind every ten years or so, so ill wait this one out.

I am also open, very much so, to science, and its abiltiy to discover answers.

Of course, much of reality may elude our senses, but much of it has been revealed to us using math and science using advanced technology, which is not so limited.

One wants to say... well, there is so much one wants to say in response to this sort of touchingly naive faith in the miraculous powers of science.

This is what I love so much about storytelling, especially fantasy and science fiction: When the ordinary is depicted in an unfamiliar world, the contrast helps it stand out, helps us grasp it and learn to value it again.

But your knowledge of science is so much less than so many Catholic Priests such as Gregor Mendel (1822 - 1884) the father of modern genetics, Georges Lemaître (1894 - 1966) the person who proposed the Big Bang Theory and Stanley Jaki Born in Hungary, he earned doctorates in Systematic Theology and Nuclear Physics, is fluent in five languages, and has authored 30 books.

The real question is how many of them have so much as an A.A. in a hard science?

Science drastically changes every decade, and what was true one decade is often turned upside down the next, so it is often difficult to put much credence into anything.

What has transformed climate science from a normal intellectual discipline to a matter of so much controversy?

Whether it's politics, science, history of literature... the young mind absorbs so much info but has not background to know what is real or not.

Not so much for the supernatural but for everyday guidance for a thousand ethical questions people are going have driven by science and money — as well as recognizing divine moments.

Science has proven pretty much all of it to be false and the book itself contradicts itself more so than the hypocrites who read it.

For one thing, Hegel says as much: «As science, truth is pure self - consciousness in its self - development and has the shape of the self, so that the absolute truth of being is the known Notion and the Notion as such is the absolute truth of being (das an und für sich seiende).