Sentences with phrase «so much scientific evidence»

There is so much scientific evidence about our brain chemistry.

So, in short, this «evidence» that proves Christianity isn't so much scientific evidence as it is idealistic / philosophical / rhetorical resonance that may or may not occur when an individual encounters the Christian idea of Jesus and the death / resurrection story.

Not exact matches

What's so sad is his willingness to completely ignore the reams of scientific evidence, data, knowledge, inference, etc. that very much describes what was going on thousands or millions of years ago.

What bothers me so much about the homebirth debate is that we have ample scientific evidence to show that homebirth is safe for low risk women.

They all promote a Whole Plant Food Based diet of one version or another — based on the body of scientific evidence (which you don't find so much with people who promote diets such as the paleo diet)..

I regret this article's missinformation in the light of so much annectodal and scientific evidence against animal protein which always come with animal fats which are well known now to be linked to various vascular diseases.

Oz and physicians like him think that there's so much to be gained by eating whole grains and fruits (we agree on the green vegetables, although I do so less because of any compelling scientific evidence than because my mother insisted they were good for me) that they think this should be recommended to anyone and everyone and a diet that restricts them can't possibly be healthful.

To give you a taste of what is coming in Part 2, the arguments can be summarized as: 1) Education does not lend itself to a single «best» approach, so the Gates effort to use science to discover best practices is unable to yield much productive fruit; 2) As a result, the Gates folks have mostly been falsely invoking science to advance practices and policies they prefer for which they have no scientific support; 3) Attempting to impose particular practices on the nation's education system is generating more political resistance than even the Gates Foundation can overcome, despite their focus on political influence and their devotion of significant resources to that effort; 4) The scale of the political effort required by the Gates strategy of imposing «best» practices is forcing Gates to expand its staffing to levels where it is being paralyzed by its own administrative bloat; and 5) The false invocation of science as a political tool to advance policies and practices not actually supported by scientific evidence is producing intellectual corruption among the staff and researchers associated with Gates, which will undermine their long - term credibility and influence.

If you are not willing to actually read the primary literature, work the math, and understand the scientific evidence, all your «skepticism» is just so much vacuous complaining.

It's not really about evidence so much, it's more about an actual scientific proof that humans are the main cause of the slight warming that has happened in this world over the last 100 years or so.

I also find that many of those who might be categorized in the identified groups on AGW are in that category not so much for their judgment on the scientific evidence but rather their grounding in the politics of the matter.