Sentences with phrase «so natural things»

11 Just as the house can be taken apart into its bricks, so a natural thing can be reduced to its elements.

Most of them are our 3rd best option, so the natural thing is to loan them out and promote the 4th best option to the u21s

So the natural thing to do is to compare what we've built to the nicest product that exists in the market,» he said.

Not exact matches

Even more important, don't give in to the natural human desire to know exactly what's being said about you, or to try to please everyone so they'll only have good things to say.

So, it wants to turn Messenger into a full - on platform for retrieving information and getting things done through natural - seeming conversations with businesses.

So by putting print at the back end, where it now fits in the natural order of things, you can really attack costs.»

It turns out that even those who stress particular negotiation behaviors and attitudes see those things not as hollow gambits but as the natural performance traits of the smarter negotiator you must become — by way of better preparation, rational thinking, and so on.

Plus there was a nice bonus: Peer pressure and natural competitiveness caused a few of us to help our employees accomplish things worthy of praise so we had great stuff to report.

And I've played a lot of conflict characters or that enter into conflict so it's kind of a natural thing for an actor.

They knew that busy professionals often check their email first thing in the morning, and so an email newsletter was the natural choice to get their attention.

After so much unexpected loss (savings, houses, discretionary spending), a renewed interest in things that are permanent and reliable is only natural — you might drop $ 800 on a pair handmade John Lobb oxfords, but should the nuclear holocaust hit, those shoes are gonna outlast the cockroaches, which is certainly more than you can say for a trucker cap.

«I only had to go two floors, so I had to talk quickly but I happened to mention a few things — over-the-counter, natural, premium — that hit the hot buttons,» she says.

The only important thing a Neo-Wicksellian would add is that it's important to distinguish between nominal and real rates of interest (real = nominal minus inflation), so if we have a 2 % inflation target we add 2 % to the natural rate to get the «neutral» nominal rate.

Sure, some things will be rebuilt better than before, but those benefits are likely to be overwhelmed by the disruptions, not only in economic activity, shipping, and so forth, but in the natural resources markets.

So all that penalising has got us nowhere — spammers have just moved onto the next thing and it has resulted only in costing many genuine businesses that aren't SEO exports an awful lot of money and time undoing things; things that were done in good faith because at the time, that was how natural search worked.

I mean in reality, MANY people are «visual» beings... so it's only natural that we want to SEE things on a charts to help guide us.

So, there is a logic to natural things that is much superior to our own.»

So you have this whole element of peer to peer coins and things that we've already got natural networks.

«We are in a valley of people who challenge the status quo, so it sort of seems natural that we have venture investors who are thinking about how to do things differently,» said Aileen Lee, founder of Cowboy Ventures and a former partner at Kleiner Perkins.

No... essentially, God is the collective wild imagination of a bunch of scientifically ignorant humans who lived thousands of years ago and had absolutely no understanding of the world around them, so the only way they could possibly accept the way things were was to invent something that controlled any natural mechanism they didn't understand.

They condemn Catholics, because, however religious they may be, they are natural, unaffected, easy, and cheerful in their mention of sacred things; and they think themselves never so real as when they are especially solemn.

If it makes you feel good, go for it, but it ain't the natural way of things so don't try guilt trippin'the rest of us for lookin» out for ourselves and our own (ie: direct family and friends).

and at the time of jesus moses gallileo newton charles darwin, people opposed them but ultimately the same people bowed to their eternal truth, so norm is man made not natural and it changes from time to time, the only thing which is self reliant and unchanging is mother nature, so Sikh faith is not a ritualistic dumb faith, indeed it's a lifestyle which tells to «Respect and follow The Laws of Nature and not to destroyy the beauty of nature».

Still amazes me how people are so willing to follow an idea, a religion, a dude telling fairy tales from a stage, rather than the things that they see before them every day, and in doing so, tie everyday natural occurrences into evidence for the validity of their fairy tales.

Our brains are built to intuitively grasp natural numbers, we need education to learn about zero and the rest, our brains are built to seek refuge from the unexplainable, the unknown holds some danger, so the brain has mechanisms of inventing imaginary supernatural creatures to help make sense of things that are beyond our knowledge and understanding.

Sure, any of them could be the real cause, but so could something natural that we just don't happen to understand yet, just as we didn't understand many things a hundred years ago that did turn out to have natural causes that we do understand now.

Where most Bible translations accurately translate the Greek as saying something along the lines of «The natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God,» the NIV reads Calvinistic theology into this verse, and assumes that the natural man does not even have the Spirit, and so translated the verse this way: «The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God.»

Again with the deity thing, You have no deity in your camp, i get that, so tell me how you respond to awful natural events or people?

Furthermore, it could also be argued that when Paul says the natural man «does not» receive the things of the Spirit of God, «nor can he know them,» he is not referring to an inherent inability to do so, but rather to an antagonistic mindset that refuses to seek the truth and understand these things.

I'm with you on the promiscuous artist thing... All these effects you described, by natural logic have causes, with effects leading to cause other things, and so on.

Science does not need to deal with the question of what things are for, so it should avoid language that hints of an intentionality underlying natural phenomena.

Matthew Levering's analysis suffers from a fundamental flaw but one that has its intellectual origins in longstanding American constitutional battles and thus has become so completely ingrained in the modern American psyche that it seems part of the natural order of things: Where there is a difference between two classes, there must, ipso facto, exist a hierarchy between them.

I think given equal opportunities there will be a natural inclination for many towards traditional roles and that this is healthy, has nothing to do with any artificial social construct but is natural and comes out of biology and now might be the time to be having open discussions about this kind of thing without having to face the fear of being labelled misogynistic for doing so or with feeling fearful of any threat to equality.

That is an odd thing to say about a Church that donates millions of dollars in medical and relief supplies to several different areas of the world for assistance after natural disasters, and that puts so much emphasis on strong marriage, dedicated parenting, forgiveness, and striving to be like Christ.

So carnal natural reasoning will always say, boloney, or its not possible, there is no God that created the Heavens and the Earh... the things of the Spirit or not understood by our carnal nature... Get your Bible out and ask God to reveal to you His Power and Glory — with wistom and understanding.

It is natural that, by reason of the exceptional contacts which have enabled me, a Jesuit (reared, that is to say, in the bosom of the Church) to penetrate and move freely in active spheres of thought and free research, I should have been very forcibly struck by things scarcely apparent to those who have lived only in one or other of the two opposed worlds, so that I feel compelled to cry them aloud.

This society is so hung up on naked breasts that they find breastfeeding repulsive, when in fact it is the most natural thing for a baby and mother.

Physics doesn't allow a god to exist, and the very idea that a being can hear everyone's thoughts and change things in the natural world is so foreign to me that I can't possibly believe something that far fetched.

«So we've got a thing called «mountain pilgrims» which is sort of beginning to be a fresh expression of church which is encouraging people to make a link between natural beauty and the sense of awe and wonder which they feel at that and then a sense of awe and wonder at the Creator who created this wonderful beauty.»

It is the complete reversal of the «natural» order of things a METANOIA — the Greek word for repentance, meaning precisely a turning around of the mind, so that it no longer faces into the past, the land of the shadow of death, but into the Eternal Present.

According to Roger Ames (NAT 117), an «aesthetic order» is a paradigm that: (1) proposes plurality as prior to unity and disjunction to conjunction, so that all particulars possess real and unique individuality; (2) focuses on the unique perspective of concrete particulars as the source of emergent harmony and unity in all interrelationships; (3) entails movement away from any universal characteristic to concrete particular detail; (4) apprehends movement and change in the natural order as a processive act of «disclosure» — and hence describable in qualitative language; (5) perceives that nothing is predetermined by preassigned principles, so that creativity is apprehended in the natural order, in contrast to being determined by God or chance; and (6) understands «rightness» to mean the degree to which a thing or event expresses, in its emergence toward novelty as this exists in tension with the unity of nature, an aesthetically pleasing order.

In the future it will not necessarily be a good thing to produce more and more, to consume more and more, if to do so threatens to exhaust the planet's natural bounty or to pollute us to death.

Nevertheless, besides the issue of natural justice, I think that desire is defined as something that is considered to have a so - called positive outcome, so I would think that on a personal level self - immolation has no personal desire (unless «fame» and / or desire to die are there) and it is surely painful to the person self - immolating (unlike e.g. self - explosion), and the thing being probably considered by individual persons as social sacrifice.

DO educate yourself on the natural Universe, human history and the history of life on Earth, so as to be able to properly evaluate claims that a benevolent, mind - reading god is behind the whole thing.

We need to see these things because many of us have been so steeped in religion that we have a natural defence against seeing who we really are (ie.

Jane, Buddhism is one of the great religions of the world, in panthrotheism it is one of all religions that God had willed to serve humans who believes on its doctrine.But since we are all humans, we have to experience all the trials of life so that in the future when His Will shall be implemented by us, the wisdom of experience of all religions will be the basis of our decisions.Thats why genocides, wars,, pestilence, natural calamities, and all what we percieve as injustices, such as tyranny, persecutions and all the negative events in history is part of His will, because in panthrotheism, there is no devil or satan.everything has a reason.and we have to accept it, Remember that He is not faith selective but performance appreciative, it is the good things you do that He wills.

Nothing but in a mess of hate, in difference, greed, perversion, imposed poverty, etc, etc. with no natural affection for one another no matter the skin, or what have you, all not as one, so these other cruel, or unexplained things will be.

(Though if Griffin really thinks predation is a bad thing one would expect him to feel disgust, rather than reverence, for our present natural order which depends upon it so heavily.)

The same God is the author of our natural intellect as well as revelation, as classical Catholic theology so often reminds us, so we should not be surprised if what the Church teaches makes wonderful sense also just from a purely natural point of view and people end up doing what the Church recommends, not because she recommends it, but just because it is the most sensible thing to do.

Except when folks are in a funk, drunk, in France, or at a university, almost all of them seem to believe that some things are really right and wrong and not just right and wrong because they happen to think so today or because natural selection has programmed them with the illusion that some of their choices are more virtuous than others.