Sentences with phrase «so no point talking»

Red or no red we played like shit so no point talking about this.

Some people are so full of themselves that they will never listen so no point talking.

Not exact matches

Facebook (FB), of course, also makes a point of talking about the «interest graph» that it has developed around all of its billion or so users.

Talks aimed at forming a grand coalition between M5S and the center - right have failed so far, however, as M5S» leader Luigi Di Maio has point - blank ruled out any coalition that includes Berlusconi.

«We're talking about 10 basis points, so a relatively small change,» she says.

I asked whom I was speaking with and also pointed out he had no idea whom he was talking to, because he never even asked my name — so how could he possibly know my «case file»?

For example, if I were trying to communicate the rules of the game using those rules, I'd write: «The point of the game is to talk and write with words that are so short that they can not be split.»

We also make a point to talk to our vendors» technical people, so that we know what the knowledge base is behind their products.»

«The regulations do not allow it, so what's the point of talking (to Taiwanese firms)?»

Both are wealthy, big - talking New York businessmen and many have pointed out similarities in both mannerisms and speaking style, with Scaramucci on CNN Wednesday morning parroting one of Trump's Trumpiest lines: «We're going to win so much you are actually going to get tired of winning,» the Mooch told Chris Cuomo.

There are always many Canadian companies at CES, so I also make a point of talking to some of them to gauge their experiences.

But with so many interests — and political careers — at stake, the risk that talks could fall through at any point remains a serious risk,» he warned, adding that such a scenario would have an impact of a 1.5 percent contraction on the U.K.'s long - term growth trend.

I wrote up some talking points for preparing to close the business, and why I was choosing to do so.

So it may be surprising that, as a CFO, I don't want to emphasize those business - friendly talking points when I discuss my company's new paid leave policy.

Most of us wouldn't go to an external meeting without an agenda and some talking points, so apply that approach to all internal meetings, too.

What's the point of trying to talk to a new client if the conversation is so boring they won't remember it anyway?

Klein narrates: «There's only so much protesting can accomplish... at a certain point, you have to talk about what you're fighting for.»

Months later, the relationship between Cambridge and the Bolton PAC had grown so close that the firm was writing up talking points for Mr. Bolton.

At the end of the next panel session, Sawant returned to the topic, reading another prepared talking point that Albertson's is on Forbes» «top companies» list, so it couldn't possibly be struggling.

If you anticipate a problem coming, mobilize employees and give them talking points and social media guidelines to follow so that your brand response is consistent.

At this point, you know enough about what happens when you default on a student loan, so let's talk about how to fix it.

ac.uk links pointing to its domain, so I wrote a guest blog post for them talking about how graduates can find job opportunities using social media.

OK, so maybe one of the viewpoints fit the partisan cliche, but the idea that Facebook might need regulation was a frequent talking point, particularly from Democrats pushing already - proposed legislation.

It is important to point that you should take out time to develop your marketing and presentation skills, so that you will be able to maximize every opportunity you get to talk to a client.

Kristina: So clearly there are going to be a lot of winners and losers in this whole area, can you talk about that from your point of view?

An immodest proposition: If we're going to keep talking about Stormy Daniels — and it certainly seems like another stiletto will drop at some point — we should try to better understand why her branding and brand messaging have been so successful.

KAI is using its Lockheed connection as a selling point to Israel, especially in view of the company's concern that someone at the Ministry of Defense is evading them and holding secret talks with Alenia Aermacchi, ostensibly following orders to do so.

Postponing doing so until the advent of death emerges on the horizon proves to be futile, at which point, as highlighted by the respective article, talking about family matters takes precedence... empirically validated by the related professionals in this particular field.

These are nothing but AIPAC required talking points and lend support to the notion, as Pat Buchanan so accurately noted, that Washington DC is indeed Israeli Occupied Territory.

I'm talking about all the other points that I've brought up that you so conveniently ignore, as you damn well know.

* My point, again, as I understand it in terms of our 1st amendment, and freedom of speech, was to (build in) a «wall» of separation of church and government... (because) of «Christianity,» since you are talking about our country, so as not to have - anyone's freedom of speech and their civil liberties trampled on.

Liberal Boomers, who seldom if ever seriously criticize the legions of conservative - demonizers in your midst, for this post I will mostly join Mr. Druckenmiller in accusing you outright, that is, I will act as if this was your premeditated plan motivated by selfish interest, and not a pattern of political self - delusion that you fell into, given the drip - drip - drip of Democrat talking points over the years, given your gleeful listening to those who dismissed conservatives as hateful dunces, so that you ceased to even consider the NUMBERS conservatives kept pointing to, and just kept on doggedly voting D.

For those saying there is nothing wrong with what he is doing; that is your ignorace talking and many of you do not know God anyway; so your point is worthless

We will talk more about predetermination and foreordination in the future posts about Unconditional Election and the Sovereignty of God, so I don't want to use a lot of room to discuss these issues here, except to say that Scripture, reason, and experience all seem to point pretty clearly to the fact that God expects us to make wise choices and holds us accountable for the choices and decisions we make.

Her second point was that teenagers are already talking about this, so it is easy for Christians to engage with when we've got such an appealing alternative: «If the church wants to be connecting with young people, we need to be hearing what their concerns are and this has been subject young people have been really willing to open up about.»

I know that nobody could talk any sense into him so there's no point even trying, but all those people who followed him ought to never read their bibles again because it appears that their guru is rewriting it.

The earlier comment using John 6:40: this was spoken BEFORE the resurrection of Jesus, so talking about it at that point would have meant nothing to them.

I just can't stop laughing at how much the Russ», the new - man's, the devin's, the kermits, the Rainer's, etc., etc., on this blog are so desperate to be in control and demand that the Doris» stay on the «current» argument since they can't handle anything that deviates outside their talking points.

But at some point I had to say, «No, God didn't speak to me, so why am I talking this way?!»

You can't be talked out of that — and Panikker's point is that no one should try: our opportunity and obligation is to speak and to listen, so that heart will speak to heart across and by means of our differences.

But if it doesn't — like when it talks about the anger of God, or repentance, or gay sex, or divorce — then we can emphasise its humanness, point out the limited knowledge of the writer, explain how they came to be so silly, and move beyond the text to a supposedly higher ethical standard.

There are four affirmations about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed in Christian faith: (1) Jesus is truly human, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, living a human life under the same human conditions any one of us faces — thus Christology, statement of the significance of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one in whom God energizes in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity; in traditional language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word of God»; (3) for our sake, to secure human wholeness of life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus not only lived among us but also was crucified for us — this is the point of talk about atonement wrought in and by him; (4) death was not the end for him, so it is not as if he never existed at all; in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it, so that now and forever he is a reality in the life of God and effective among humankind.

So the point of Whitehead's example in the above passage would be that in talking about the membership of the complex structured society which is a total man, in the ordinary sense of the term, one is referring not to a subordinate society, such as the enduring object which is the life, or soul, of the man, but to all the individual actual occasions in all the subordinate societies and subordinate nexus which make up the man.

A debate in which the thoughts are not expressed in the way in which they existed in the mind but in the speaking are so pointed that they may strike home in the sharpest way, and moreover without the men that are spoken to being regarded in any way present as persons; a conversation characterized by the need neither to communicate something, nor to learn something, nor to innuence someone, nor to come into connexion with someone, but solely by the desire to have one's own self - reliance confirmed by making the impression that is made, or if it has become unsteady to have it strengthened; a friendly chat in which each regards himself as absolute and legitimate and the other as relativized and questionable; a lovers» talk in which both partners alike enjoy their own glorious soul and their precious experience — what an underworld of faceless spectres of dialogue!

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.

Just as Peter missed the point of the first prediction of suffering and death, so James and John here completely misunderstand the nature of the of an earthly nature of the kingdom Jesus has been talking about.

In recent years, we've seen our news feeds become so inundated with a seemingly constant stream of global catastrophes and political talking points, that it's no surprise many of us...

I only read the abstract so far, but it seems to be talking about, as you pointed out, «behavioral abnormalities and structural differences in the prefrontal cortex.»

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

Except that your fake god doesn't exist and so you will never be able to point to anything as being «his will» no matter what you are talking about.